The Study on Index of Greeness in Streets of Seoul by Using Automatic Measurement Techniques

자동 계측 기법을 이용한 서울 주요 가로의 녹시율 분석

  • Received : 2012.02.08
  • Accepted : 2012.04.15
  • Published : 2012.04.30

Abstract

In this study, we measured the Index of Greeness(I.O.G) and analyzed factors that affect in downtown street of Seoul. The aim of this article is to provide an ways of improving I.O.G, with an emphasis on accuracy of measurement. We utilized the autimatic measurment techniques proposed by Tonosaki to solve the problem of accuracy in measurement. The result is as follows : Firstly, the average I.O.G of Gwanghwamun Plaza is 15.76%, Jongno is 11.48% and Dasanro(from Yaksu station to Beotigogae station) is 6.36%. According to the comprehensive analysis in three reseach areas, it shows that I.O.G is intimately linked with planting method, species of trees and the presence of wall planting. Secondly, it was analyzed that grass and ground-cover planting promote I.O.G better than other method. The I.O.G of photo which contains grass is 45.47%. According to the comparative analysis between tree planting and multi-planting method, the presence of lower planting showed a difference about 8.77% of I.O.G.. From the persipective of I.O.G, tree planting with two lines is more effective than one. The difference of two ways is about 3.24%. Thirdly, it is an efficint way to use the wall planting or vertical planting in order to promote I.O.G.. In Dasanro, The I.O.G of photo which contains wall planting or vertical planting is 45.47% in contrast to the average of I.O.G. is 6.36%. Fourthly, the difference of I.O.G between broadleaf tree and needleleaf tree was larger than we thought. If look closely confined to this study, the I.O.G of street planted by Pine is 3.61% and Eastern Sycamore Family Bottonwood is 12.55%.

Keywords

References

  1. 경기개발연구원(2002), 경기도 내 가로수 현황조사 및 현황도 작성
  2. 서울시보 2913호 (2009), 건축물 환경영향평가 항목 및 심의기준 변경고시, 서울특별시고시 제2009-239호
  3. 서울시정개발연구원(2003), 서울시 가로 녹시율 증진방안
  4. 이승훈(2007), 녹시율의 정서증진효과에 대한 맥락 분석: 집과 집 이외의 장소, 한국심리학회지 12(4), pp. 997-1017
  5. 인천발전연구원(2003), 구도심 가로의 녹량 및 녹시율 증진 방안
  6. 조용현(2006), 경관 시뮬레이션을 통한 가로 녹시율 증진방안 및 목표수준 설정, 한국조경학회지 34(2), pp.26-35
  7. 조용현, 정용문, 김광동(2006), 녹지량 지표로서 녹시율 개념을 도입한 서울시 가로 환경 특성 분석, 한국조경학회지 34(1), pp. 1-9
  8. 조용현, 조현길, 한봉호(2010), 서울시 환경영향평가에서 가로 녹시율 지표의 적용 실태, 환경영향평가 19(2), pp. 205-213
  9. Herzog, T. R., Black, A. M., Foutain, K. A. & Knottd, D. J. (1997), Reflection and attentional recovery as distinctive benefits of restorative environments. Journal of Environment Psychology, 17(2), pp. 165-170 https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1997.0051
  10. Kaplan, R. (2001) The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment & Behavior, 33(4), pp. 507-542 https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973115
  11. Tonosaki, C. (2010), Research on the new measurement of the ratio of vertical green coverage with leaf colors. Landscape Research Japan Online 3, pp. 26-31 https://doi.org/10.5632/jilaonline.3.26
  12. Tonosaki, C. (2011), 입체녹화 기술의 동향과 녹화효과의 계측 기술, 도시경관 개선을 위한 입체녹화 활용방안 한일국제세미나 자료집
  13. White, E.V., Gatersleben, B. (2011) Greenery on residential buildings: Does it affect prefernces and perceptions of beauty?. Journal of environmental Psychology, 31, pp.89-98 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.11.002
  14. Yang, J,. Zhao, L, Mcbride, J, Gong, P. (2009), Can you see green? Assessing the visibility of urban forest in cities. Landscape and Urban Planning 91, pp.97-104 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.004