Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine (대한물리의학회지)

The Korean Society of Physical Medicine (대한물리의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Comparison of Keyword of Articles in Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine with MeSH

대한물리의학회지 논문의 주제어와 MeSH용어의 비교

  • Roh, Jung-Suk (Department of Physical Therapy, Hanseo University)
  • 노정석 (한서대학교 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2012.07.09
  • Accepted : 2012.08.21
  • Published : 2012.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to investigate the coincidence between keywords of Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine (JKSPM) and MeSH terms, a controlled vocabulary used in MEDLINE. Methods : A total of 838 keywords used in 252 papers of JKSPM from Vol.1, No.1, 2006 to Vol.7, No.1, 2012 were compared with MeSH terms. All of keywords are classified to three large categories; complete coincidence, incomplete coincidence, and complete incoincidence. Results : The keywords in complete coincidence category were 183(21.8%), the keywords in incomplete coincidence category were 378(45.1%), and the keywords in complete incoincidence category were 277(33%). The most used keyword in complete coincidence category was 'stroke' and in complete incoincidence category was 'balance'. The most used keyword matching entry terms in incomplete coincidence category was 'elderly'. Conclusion : The rate of complete coincidene of keywords with MeSH terms was not higher than the rates of incomplete coincidence and complete incoincidence. It is necessary to understand MeSH terms more accurately and specifically. The JKSPM should ask the authors to use MeSH terms as keyword when they submit the paper.

Keywords

References

  1. 권애경, 채영문. MeSH를 확장한 한국보건의료정보 분야 영문 주제어 연구. 대한의료정보학회지. 2002; 8(4):91-8.
  2. 김병성, 김수영. 가정의학회지 논문의 영문주제어 선택에 있어서 MeSH용어 사용 여부와 선택 정확도. 가정의학회지. 1998;19(7):531-7.
  3. 박수현, 박경영. 대한작업치료학회지 논문의 영문주제어와 MeSH용어의 비교분석(창간호-2010년). 대한작업치료학회지. 2011;19(4):131-46.
  4. 이춘실, 문혜원. 한국의학학술 논문의 저자선정 주제어와 MeSH 용어의 비교 분석. 정보관리학회지. 2000;17(3):109-24.
  5. 정승교, 송경애, 김경희. 기본간호학회지 게재 논문의 주요어와 MeSH용어의 비교(2003-2007년). 기본간호학회지. 2008;15(4):558-65.
  6. 조진성, 이미진. 대한응급의학회지에 사용된 저자 선정 중심단어의 MeSH 일치도와 다빈도 오류 분석. 대한응급의학회지. 2009;20(6):722-8.
  7. 황건, 서민성, 이세일. 대한성형외과학회지 논문의 영문핵심어 선택에 있어서 의학주제어의 사용. 대한성형외과학회지. 2002;29(5):464-8.
  8. American physical therapy association. APTA vision statement for physical therapy 2020. http://www.apta.org.
  9. Clarke M, Greaves L, James S. MeSH terms must be used MEDLINE searches. BMJ. 1997;314 (7088):1203.
  10. Hjorland B. Evidence based practice: An analysis based on the philosophy of science. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2011;62(7):1301-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21523
  11. Jeong GH, Ahn YM, Cho DS. Coincidence analysis of keywords of the Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing with MeSH. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2005;35(7):1420-5. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2005.35.7.1420
  12. KoreaMed. KoreaMed overview. http://www.koreamed. org
  13. Lee YC. Searching MeSH(structure, types & characteristics). Korean J Med Libr. 2004;31(1,2):1-11.
  14. Lowe HJ, Barnett GO. Understanding and using the medical subject headings(MeSH) vocabulary to perform literature searches. JAMA. 1994;271(14):1103-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03510380059038
  15. Womack KR. Conformity for conformity's sake? The choice of a classification system and a subject heading system in academic health science libraries. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. 2006;42(1):93-115. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v42n01_07

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Keywords of the Journal of Sasang Constitutional Medicine with MeSH Terms vol.25, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7730/JSCM.2013.25.1.34
  2. Comparison and Analysis of Keywords in the Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society Articles to MeSH Terms vol.21, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2016.21.2.83
  3. 'PNF and Movement'의 연구 동향 vol.16, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.21598/jkpnfa.2018.16.3.365
  4. Comparison of intellectual structure of knowledge in international journal of preventive medicine with MeSH: A co-word analysis vol.10, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_346_18
  5. Determining the informativeness of comments: a natural language study of F1000Research open peer review reports vol.44, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-02-2020-0073