Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Behavioral Characteristics of Second Graders in Science Learning Situations: A Phenomenological Research on a Motivation System about Science Learning

초등학교 2학년 학생들이 과학학습 상황에서 보이는 행동 특성: 과학학습 동기체계에 관한 현상학적 연구

  • Received : 2011.12.29
  • Accepted : 2012.04.17
  • Published : 2012.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the behavioral characteristics of elementary second graders depending on SL-BIS/BAS (Behavioral Inhibition/Activation System about Science Learning) in science learning situation. For this study, 20 second grade students participated. This study followed a phenomenological research method, a form of qualitative research. As the results show, students who have a sensitive motivation system to SL-BIS directly expressed their disappointment of the result and easily get distracted in class when they failed in science learning activity. They participated in group work passively, for example, they interacted less in the group or avoided answering questions. Even though the students have a lot of questions that were usually simple, empty or repetitive words. They have within themselves the good will of challenging difficult experiment that was their only expression of passive will. The students have a tendency to be dependent on their friends in an experiment, making it unlikely that they preferred group work from the beginning. Otherwise, students who have sensitive motivation system to SL-BAS endured science learning activity to the end regardless of the negative result. In particular, they were enthusiastically working on home-school materials. When the students succeeded in the experiment, they responded to the cheers and openly expressed their feeling. They were satisfied with their achievement. The students have more desire for in-depth activity. Their questions were more progressive, specific and expanded. They showed a strong desire to challenge difficult experiment and preferred to interact with their group members to help each other. Based on the results, they were limited but we could find that the behavioral characteristics of second grade students in science learning situations can be predicted with a score of SL-BIS/BAS t.

이 연구의 목적은 초등학교 2학년 학생들의 SL-BIS/BAS(과학학습 행동억제체계/행동활성화체계)에 따른 과학학습 상황에서의 행동특성을 조사하는 것이다. 연구를 위해 초등학교 2학년 1학급에서 20명을 추출하여 연구를 시행하였다. 연구는 질적 연구 방법 중의 하나인 현상학적인 연구 방법을 따랐다. 연구를 통해 조사된 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, SL-BIS에 민감한 학생들은 과학학습 상황에서 '실험 결과에 대한 부정적 반응', '실험 활동에 소극적임', '침묵', '단순 반복 질문'과 같은 행동 특성을 보였다. 둘째, SL-BAS에 민감한 학생들은 '실험 결과에 대한 긍정적 반응', '실험에 대한 도전 정신', '학습지 작성에 열심', '구체적 질문을 많이 함', '상호 보완적 모둠 실험 선호'와 같은 행동 특성을 보였다. 이 연구를 통해 제한적이기는 하나 SL-BIS/BAS의 검사결과가 초등학교 2학년 학생들의 과학학습 상황에서의 행동특성을 예측할 수 있다는 점을 질적 연구를 통해 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽영순, 김찬종, 이양락, 정득실(2006). 초.중등 학생들의 과학 흥미도 조사. 한국지구과학회지, 27(3), 260-268.
  2. 남지연, 양일호, 홍은주, 임성만, 김은애(2011). 과학학습 행동억제체계 및 행동활성화체계와 과학성취도의 관계. 과학교육연구지, 35(1), pp. 59-67.
  3. 백성혜, 김혜경, 채우기, 권균(1999). 학습 동기에 따른 학습자의 개념 변화 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(1), 91-99.
  4. 이근호(2007). 질적연구 방법으로서 현상학: 독특성과 보편성 사이의 변증법적 탐구 양식. 교육인류학연구, 10(2), 41-64.
  5. 이미경, 김경희(2004). 과학에 대한 태도와 과학 성취도의 관계. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 399-407.
  6. 이범홍, 김주훈, 이양락, 홍미영, 이미경, 이창훈, 신일용, 심재호, 곽영순, 전영석, 김동영, 장재현(2005). 과학과 교육과정 개선 방안 연구. 한국교육과정평가원 연구보고, RRC 2005-7.
  7. 임성만(2010). 과학학습 행동억제체계 및 행동활성화체계에 대한 척도 개발. 한국교원대학교 박사학위논문.
  8. 임성만, 임재근, 최현동, 양일호(2008). 초.중.고 학생과 예비 교사 및 초등 교사가 생각하는 과학자에 대한 이미지 분석. 초등과학교육, 27(1), 1-8.
  9. 임성만, 홍은주, 양일호, 임재근(2011). 과학학습 행동억제체계 및 행동활성화체계와 자기효능감과의 상관관계 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 31(5), pp.758-769.
  10. 전경문, 노태희(1997). 학생들의 과학 학습 동기 및 전략. 한국과학교육학회지, 17(4), 415-423.
  11. 정종진(1996). 학교 학습과 동기. 서울: 교육과학사.
  12. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  13. Brophy, J. E. (1988). On motivation students. In Berliner & B. Rosenshine(Eds.). Talks to teacher (pp. 201-245). New york: Randim House.
  14. Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responsess to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholoy, 67(2), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
  15. Chang, C. Y., & Cheng, W. (2008). Science achievement and students' self-confidence and interest in science: A Taiwanese representative sample study. International Journal of Science Education, 30(9), 1183-1200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701435384
  16. Colazzi, P. E.(1978), Psychological research as the phenomenologist view it existential phenomenology, New York : Oxford University press.
  17. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches(2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  18. Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Newbury Park:Sage.
  19. Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics. 102(7), 335-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18217.x
  20. Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1135-1149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1135
  21. Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2007). Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 108-1107.
  22. Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck's theory of personality. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model of personality (pp. 246-276). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  23. Gray, J. A. (1982). The neuropsuchology of anxiety: am enquiry into the functions of the septohippocampal system. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  24. Gray, J. A. (1987). Perspectives on anxiety and impulsivity: A commentary. Journal of Research in Personality, 21(4), 493-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(87)90036-5
  25. Newton, L. D., & Newton, D. P. (1998). Primary children's conceptions of science and scientists: Is th impact of a national curriculum breaking down the stereotype? Intenationl Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1137-1149. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200909
  26. Pintrich, P, R., & Schunk, D (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications(2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  27. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  28. Song, J. W., & Kim, K. S. (1999). How Korean students see scientists: The images of th scientist. Intenationl Journal of Science Education, 21(9), 957-977. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290255
  29. Symonds. P. M., & Chase, D. H. (1992). Practice vs. Motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 282-289. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.282
  30. Tuan, H. L., Chin, C. C., & Shieh, S. H. (2005). The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 639-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323737
  31. van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. London, Ontario, Canada: The University of Western Ontario.
  32. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96(3), 465-490. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.96.3.465
  33. Wheeler, R. E., Davidson, R. J., & Tomarken, A. J. (1993). Frontal brain asymmetry and emotional reactivity: A biological substrate of affective style. Psychophysiology, 30(1), 82-89.

Cited by

  1. Investigation of Eye-Tracking on Learning Task Perceiving Process of Elementary Students with Different Motivation System on Science Learning vol.34, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2015.34.1.086
  2. 관찰 상황에서 초등학생들의 과학학습 동기체계에 따른 시선이동 분석 vol.33, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.6.1154