DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Student Motivation and Interests as Proxies for Forming STEM Identities

  • Received : 2012.03.19
  • Accepted : 2012.04.10
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

This research investigated the motivation and interests of a sample of predominately-underrepresented populations to better understand whether informal STEM learning experiences offer support for developing STEM identities. A valid and reliable three-section self-reporting survey was administered to 169 secondary students as the primary data source. Identity was used as a theoretical lens along with descriptive statistics to reveal students' perceived benefits of the informal STEM learning experience, a Mathematics, Engineering, Science Achievement (MESA) program in the western U.S., for improving their understanding of science, mathematics, and engineering concepts, increasing their interest in science, mathematics, and engineering careers, and increasing their belief of the importance of these STEM disciplines. In summary, the findings emerging, considered alongside current identity research, suggest that informal STEM learning experiences offer students from underrepresented STEM populations the space needed for successful STEM identity bids, either for future career pursuits or participation in a STEM literate populace as a non-STEM professional societal member.

Keywords

References

  1. Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E. & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students' identities, participation, and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564-582.
  2. Brickhouse, N. W. (2001). Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 282 295. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<282::AID-TEA1006>3.0.CO;2-0
  3. Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187-1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
  4. Education Trust. (2009). Education watch national report. Washington, DC: Education Trust.
  5. Gee, J. P. (2000-2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99-125.
  6. Johnson, A., Brown, J., Carlone, H. & Cuevas, A.K. (2011). Authoring identity amidst the treacherous terrain of science: A multiracial feminist examination of the journeys of three women of color in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 339-366. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20411
  7. Kuenzi, Jeffrey J. (2008). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: Background, Federal Policy, and Legislative Action. Congressional Research Service Reports. Paper 35. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crsdocs/35
  8. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Malone, K., & Barabino, G. (2009). Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its discontents. Science Education, 93(3), 485-510. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20307
  10. National Research Council (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  11. NSF. (2008). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: U.S. demographics (December 2008 ed.). National Science Foundation.
  12. Stake, J. E., & Nikens, S.D. (2005). Adolescent girls' and boys' science peer relationships and perceptions of the possible self as scientist. Sex Roles, 52(1/2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-1189-4
  13. U.S. Government Accountability Office (2005), Federal Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Programs and Related Trends, GAO-06-114.

Cited by

  1. The Development and Validation of Instrument for Measuring High School Students' Attitude Toward Convergence vol.34, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.2.0123
  2. Using the Mixture Rasch Model to Explore Knowledge Resources Students Invoke in Mathematic and Science Assessments vol.115, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12135
  3. AN EXAMINATION OF THE IMPACT OF TEACHER QUALITY AND “OPPORTUNITY GAP” ON STUDENT SCIENCE ACHIEVEMENT IN CHINA vol.13, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9491-z
  4. Towards conceptual coherence in the research on mathematics learner identity: a systematic review of the literature vol.99, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9819-2
  5. An Exploratory Study of Middle School Students' Motivation in Science: Comparing a STEM Education Program in Korea and the USA vol.43, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2019.43.1.1
  6. EFFECT OF THE STEM ACTIVITIES RELATED TO WORK-ENERGY TOPICS ON ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS' OPINIONS ON STEM ACTIVITIES vol.18, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.507
  7. Equity-Oriented Conceptual Framework for K-12 STEM literacy vol.8, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00294-z