Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine (대한예방의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Psychological, Social, and Environmental Factors Associated With Utilization of Senior Centers Among Older Adults in Korea

  • Received : 2011.11.09
  • Accepted : 2012.03.08
  • Published : 2012.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to examine the relationships among the psychological, social, and environmental factors influencing the utilization of senior centers among older adults in Korea. Methods: A questionnaire survey was administered to two types of older adults who lived in Seoul, Korea: 262 older adults who used senior centers (3 places) and 156 older adults who did not use senior centers. Results: Our results showed clearly that the utilization of the senior centers in Korea is affected by higher self-efficacy (odds ratio [OR], 6.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.31 to 12.32), higher perceived benefits (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.16 to 4.36), lower perceived barriers (OR, 6.43; 95% CI, 3.07 to 11.45), higher family support (OR, 4.21; 95% CI, 2.02 to 8.77), and higher support from friends (OR, 4.08; 95% CI, 2.38 to 7.81). The results also showed that participants whose total travel time was 15 to 29 minutes (OR, 2.84; 95% CI, 1.21 to 3.64) or less than 14 minutes (OR, 4.68; 95% CI, 3.41 to 8.41) were more likely to use a senior center than those who had to travel more than 30 minutes. Conclusions: This study showed that the utilization of senior centers in Korea is affected by psychological, social, and environmental factors, specifically by self-efficacy, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, social support, convenience of transportation, and total travel time to the senior centers. The effects of longer-term utilization of the senior centers by non-users on health-related outcomes in a large population warrant attention.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwon S. Future of long-term care financing for the elderly in Korea. J Aging Soc Policy 2008;20(1):119-136.
  2. Choi EJ, Seo MK, Sun WD, Kim DJ, Noh JM, Kim JN, et al. Study on developing elder health promotion model through utilizing senior welfare associated facilities. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2007, p. 19 (Korean).
  3. Kwon JH, Lee JS, Han EJ, Park JY. A study on policy development to prevent the functional decline in older people. Seoul: National Health Insurance Corporation; 2009. p. 29-32 (Korean).
  4. Kim HS, Harada K, Lee EA, Nakamura Y. Long-term care insurance system in Korea: from a preventive of long-term care prevention. Sport Sci Res 2009;6:60-68 (Japanese).
  5. Kim HS, Harada K, Miyashita M, Lee EA, Park JK, Nakamura Y. Use of senior center and the health-related quality of life in Korean older adults. J Prev Med Public Health 2011;44(4):149-156.
  6. Li F, Harmer P, Glasgow R, Mack KA, Sleet D, Fisher KJ, et al. Translation of an effective tai chi intervention into a community-based falls-prevention program. Am J Public Health 2008;98(7):1195-1198.
  7. Manini T, Marko M, VanArnam T, Cook S, Fernhall B, Burke J, et al. Efficacy of resistance and task-specific exercise in older adults who modify tasks of everyday life. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007;62(6):616-623.
  8. Sarkisian CA, Prohaska TR, Davis C, Weiner B. Pilot test of an attribution retraining intervention to raise walking levels in sedentary older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2007;55(11):1842-1846.
  9. Choi NG, McDougall GJ. Comparison of depressive symptoms between homebound older adults and ambulatory older adults. Aging Ment Health 2007;11(3):310-322.
  10. Aday RH, Kehoe GC, Farney LA. Impact of senior center friendships on aging women who live alone. J Women Aging 2006; 18(1):57-73.
  11. Farone DW, Fitzpatrick TR, Tran TV. Use of senior centers as a moderator of stress related distress among Latino elders. J Gerontol Soc Work 2005;46(1):65-83.
  12. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. 2009 Actual condition survey on older adults: Korean older adults' actual life condition and a survey on welfare desire. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2010, p. 78-82 (Korean).
  13. Krout JA. Senior centers in America. 5th ed. New York: Greenwood Press; 1998, p. 24-28.
  14. McNeill LH, Kreuter MW, Subramanian SV. Social environment and physical activity: a review of concepts and evidence. Soc Sci Med 2006;63(4):1011-1022.
  15. McCormack G, Giles-Corti B, Lange A, Smith T, Martin K, Pikora TJ. An update of recent evidence of the relationship between objective and self-report measures of the physical environment and physical activity behaviours. J Sci Med Sport 2004;7(1 Suppl):81-92.
  16. Marshall VW, Altpeter M. Cultivating social work leadership in health promotion and aging: strategies for active aging interventions. Health Soc Work 2005;30(2):135-144.
  17. Brenner B. Implementing a community intervention program for health promotion. Soc Work Health Care 2002;35(1-2):359-375
  18. Pan SY, Cameron C, Desmeules M, Morrison H, Craig CL, Jiang X. Individual, social, environmental, and physical environmental correlates with physical activity among Canadians: a crosssectional study. BMC Public Health 2009;9:21.
  19. Yoo SH. Analysis of senior center participation: factors associated with frequency and duration. J Korean Gerontol Soc 2001;21(2):191-208.
  20. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. 2005 Actual condition survey on older adults: Korean older adults' actual life condition and a survey on welfare desire. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs; 2006, p. 166 (Korean).
  21. Li F, Harmer P, McAuley E, Fisher KJ, Duncan TE, Duncan SC. Tai Chi, self-efficacy, and physical function in the elderly. Prev Sci 2001;2(4):229-239.
  22. Sohng KY, Sohng S, Yeom HA. Health-promoting behaviors of elderly Korean immigrants in the United States. Public Health Nurs 2002;19(4):294-300.
  23. Pardasani M. Senior centers: characteristics of participants and nonparticipants. Act Adapt Aging 2010;34(1):48-70.
  24. Turner KW. Senior citizens centers: what they offer, who participates, and what they gain. J Gerontol Soc Work 2004;43(1): 37-47.
  25. Walker J, Bisbee C, Porter R, Flanders J. Increasing practitioners' knowledge of participation among elderly adults in senior center activities. Educ Gerontol 2004;30(5):353-366.
  26. Strain LA. Senior centers: who participates? Can J Aging 2001; 20(4):471-492.
  27. Fitzpatrick TR, McCabe J, Gitelson R, Andereck K. Factors affecting perceived social and health benefits of attendance at senior centers. Act Adapt Aging 2006;30(1):23-45.
  28. Ashida S, Heaney CA. Social networks and participation in social activities at a new senior center: reaching out to older adults who could benefit the most. Act Adapt Aging 2006; 32(1):40-58.
  29. Jang IS. The leisure type, health status, self-esteem, and social support of the elderly living alone. J Korea Acad Public Health Nurs 2006;20(2):130-140 (Korean).
  30. Hillsdon M, Panter J, Foster C, Jones A. The relationship between access and quality of urban green space with population physical activity. Public Health 2006;120(12):1127-1132.

Cited by

  1. Older Adults’ Social Relationships and Health Care Utilization: A Systematic Review vol.108, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2017.304256
  2. How Does the Built Environment in Compact Metropolitan Cities Affect Health? A Systematic Review of Korean Studies vol.16, pp.16, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162921
  3. Senior Citizen Centers Utilization: Role of Socio-Demographic Factors, Life Satisfaction and Health Condition in Korea vol.45, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5393/jamch.2020.45.3.141
  4. Kaleidoscopic associations between life outside home and the technological environment that shape occupational injustice as revealed through cross-sectional statistical modelling vol.28, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2020.1818610