References
- 간진숙․금미숙․이칭찬(2012). 수분별 유아수업 설계모형이 유아교사의 전문성 발달에 미치는 효과, 수산해양교육연구 24(1), 56-78.
- 김달효(2006). 능력별 집단편성의 비판적 이해, 서울: 시그마프레스.
- 김달효(2007). 능력별 집단편성에 대한 교사와 학생의 인식, 수산해양교육연구 19(3), 390-402.
- 김달효(2008). 학생의 능력별 집단편성에 따른 관련 변인의 차이 분석, 중등교육연구 56(2), 1-22.
- 김영철 등(1995). 고등학교 평준화 정책의 개선방안, 한국교육개발원.
- 김태균(2007). 수준별 이동 수업이 학생들의 수학적 성향과 수학성취도에 미치는 효과, 중앙대학교 석사학위논문.
- 김홍원 등(2004). 수준별 이동수업 내실화 방안연구, 한국교육개발원 연구보고서.
- 박소영(2001). 중학교 수준별 수업 운영 실태에 관한 교사 인식 조사, 교육과정연구 19(2), 한국교육과정학회, 95-117.
- 박소영(2004). 수준별 교육과정의 운영 실태와 개선 방안 연구, 수산해양교육연구 16(1), 21-34.
- 박현애(2008). 수준별 이동수업에 관한 학생과 교사들의 인식에 대한 연구, 목포대학교 석사학위논문.
- 배정애(2001). 중학교 수준별 교육에 대한 교사․학생의 인식 비교․분석, 경성대학교 석사학위논문.
- 성기선.강태중(2001). 평준화 정책과 지적 수월성 교육의 관계에 대한 실증적 검토, KEDI 교육정책포럼-한국교육의 현실과 대안(2), 한국교육개발원.
- 원영심(2008). 집단의 크기를 달리한 수준별 이동수업 효과 분석, 건국대학교 석사학위논문.
- 원효헌․김명생(2009). 중학교 수학과 특별보충과정이 학생의 정의적 특성에 미치는 효과 분석, 수산해양교육연구 21(1), 151-161.
- 정미경(2000). 수준별 수업과 교육기회의 평등화문제, 교육과정연구 18(1), 275-297.
- 중앙교육진흥연구소(2001). 일반계 고등학교의 학교별 교육효과 분석, 중앙교육진흥연구소.
- 황희숙․김주안(2000). 협동기술을 적용한 구성주의적 수업의 효과 분석, 수산해양교육연구 12(2), 102-121.
- Boaler, J., William, D., & Brown, M.(2000). Students' experiences of ability grouping: disaffection, polarization and the construction of failure, British Educational Research Journal 26(5), 631-648. https://doi.org/10.1080/713651583
- Clammer, R.(1985). Mixed ability teaching: meanings and motives, A study of two geography departments, SERCH, 7, 17-19.
- Cole, M., & Griffin, P.(1987). Contextual factors in education: improving science and mathematics education for minorities and women, Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
- Dawson, M. M.(1987). Beyond ability grouping: a review of the effectiveness of ability grouping and its alternatives, School Psychology Review 16(3), 348-369.
- Eder, D.(1981). Ability grouping as a selffulfilling prophecy : a micro-analysis of teacherstudent interaction, Sociology of Education, 54, 151-162. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112327
- Ekstrom, R. B., & Villegas, A. M.(1991). Ability grouping in middle grade mathematics: processes and consequences, Research in Middle Level Education 15(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10825541.1991.11669982
- Esposito, D.(1973). Homogeneous and heterogeneous ability grouping: principal findings and implications for evaluating and designing more effective educational environments, Review of Education Research 43(2), 163-179. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543043002163
- Finley, M. K.(1984). Teachers and tracking in a comprehensive high school, Sociology of Education, 57, 233-243. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112427
- Gamoran, A., & Berends, M.(1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: synthesis of survey and ethnographic research, Review of Educational Research 57, 415-435. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057004415
- Gene, S.(1995). NASSP Bulletin, Feb. 79, 18-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659507956804
- George, P. S.(1993). Tracking and ability grouping in the middle school: ten tentative truths, Middle School Journal 24, 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.1993.11495369
- Goldberg, M. L., Passow, A. H., & Justman, J.(1966). The effects of ability grouping, New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
- Good, T. L.(1981). Teacher expectations and student perceptions: a decade of research, Educational Leadership 38, 415-427.
- Good, T. L., & Marshall, S.(1984). Do students learn more in heterogeneous group? In. S. W. Raudenbush, & J. D. Williams.(eds). The social context of instruction : group organization and group processes, New York: Academic Press.
- Hallinan, M. T., & Sorensen, A.(1985). Ability grouping and student friendship, American Educational Research 22(4), 485-499.
- Ireson, J., & Hallam, S.(2001). Ability grouping in education, London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
- Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A.(1984). Effects of ability grouping on elementary school pupils: a meta-analysis, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, August, 24-28.
- Kulik, C. C., & Kulik, J. A.(1990). Effectiveness of mastery learning programmes : a metaanalysis, Review of Educational Research 60, 265-299. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060002265
- Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C.(1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs, Gifted Child Quarterly 36(2), 73-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600204
- Loveless, T.(1999). The tracking wars, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
- Oakes, J.(1985). Keeping track: how schools structure inequality, New York: Yale University Press.
- Oakes, J., Gamoran, A., & Page, R.(1992). Curriculum differentiation: opportunities, consequences and meaning, In P. Jackson, (ed). Handbook of research on curriculum, New York: Macmillan.
- Page, R.(1992). Lower track classrooms: a curricular and cultural perspective, New York: Teachers College Press.
- Slavin, R. E.(1989). Class size and student achievement : small effects of small classes, Educational Psychologist 24(1), 99-100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2401_4
- Slavin, R. E.(1990). Ability grouping and student achievement in secondary schools: a best evidence synthesis, Review of Educational Research 60, 471-499. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060003471
- Slavin, R. E., & Braddock, J. H. III.(1993). Ability grouping: on the wrong track, The College Board Review 168, 11-18.
- Watson, S. B., & Marshall, J. E.(1995). Heterogeneous grouping as an element of cooperative learning in an elementary education science course, School Science & Mathematics 95(8), 401-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1995.tb10192.x
- Wheelock, A.(1994). Alternatives to tracking and ability grouping, American Association of School Administrators, Arlington. VA.
- Yair, G.(1997). Teachers' polarization in heterogeneous classrooms and the social distribution of achievement: an Israeli case study, Teaching and Teacher Education 13(3), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00025-X