DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Evaluation Index for Foreign Weapon System Purchase using DEMATEL and ANP

DEMATEL과 ANP를 이용한 해외구매 무기체계의 평가지표 개발

  • 조현기 (서울과학기술대학교 산업정보시스템공학과) ;
  • 김우제 (서울과학기술대학교 산업정보시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2012.03.03
  • Accepted : 2012.05.15
  • Published : 2012.06.30

Abstract

Even though the final source selection of foreign weapon system purchase project in defense area is the most important phase, the standard evaluation index has not been developed. This paper provides an appropriate evaluation index using DEMATEL and ANP methods. First, the all possible evaluation criteria applied to the relevant previous literatures in domestic and overseas researches are derived and classified into groups. Second, DEMATEL method is used to determine the network structure representing the relations of cause and effect between groups and their sub-criteria. If isolated factors, not connected with other factors, are existed in the network structure, all factors except for the isolated ones are grouped as one large factor so that the independency between those ones is maintained. The weights of criteria are determined using AHP method if the criteria are independent relation and ANP method if the criteria are networked. The weights of higher and lower level criteria are then integrated and distributed as a point with respect to the decision making purpose. The developed evaluation index can be used as a standard one in various foreign weapon system purchase projects in defense area.

Keywords

References

  1. 강인호, 심인섭, "국방획득 사업의 의사결정 방법에 대한 소고", 한국방위산업학회지, 제5권 (2003), pp.95-108.
  2. 경태원, 김상국, "AHP 기법을 이용한 IT 프로 젝트 관리 우선순위 수립에 대한 연구", Information Systems Review, 제9권, 제3호(2007), pp.157-181.
  3. 고영형, "방위사업청 국외구매사업 제안서의 효 율적 평가체계에 관한 연구;AHP/ANP 기법 을 사용", 석사학위논문, 국방대학교, 2007.
  4. 김재희, "네트워크 의사결정기법을 활용한 감척 의사결정 평가 요소의 가중치 산정", 정책분석평가학회보, 제21권, 제2호(2011), pp.199 -218.
  5. 박용태, "차세대 기술혁신을 위한 기술지식 경영", 생능출판사, 2008.
  6. 박 현, 고길곤, 유석현, "2001년도 예비타당성 조사 연구보고서;예비타당성조사 수행을 위한 다기준분석 방안 연구(II)", 한국개발연구원 공공투자센터, 2001.
  7. 2011년 방위사업청 통계연보, 방위사업청, 2001.
  8. 방위사업청 지침 제2011-03호 절충교역 지침서, 방위사업청, 2011.
  9. 방위사업청 훈령 제170호 방위사업관리규정, 방위사업청, 2012.
  10. 심용호, 변기섭, 이봉규, "AHP와 ANP 방법론을 이용한 그린 ICT 정책의 전략적 우선순위 도출 방안", 한국 인터넷정보학회지, 제12권, 제1 호(2010), pp.85-97.
  11. 유윤식, "차기 전투기 기종결정의 평가-합리성을 중심으로", 한국 사회와 행정 연구, 제14권, 제1호(2003), pp.391-414.
  12. 은희봉, 김봉선, "계층화의사결정법(AHP)을 이용한 전투기 기종선정에 관한 연구", 항공운항학회지, 제6권(1998), pp.51-69.
  13. 은희봉, 권보헌, "AHP를 이용한 경항공기 기종선정표의 개발", 한국항공운항학회지, 제11권, 제2호(2003), pp.43-58.
  14. 이충성, "유역치수계획 최적대안 결정을 위한 의사결정모형의 개발", 박사학위논문, 인하대학교대학원, 2007.
  15. Akarte, M.M., N.V. Surendra, B. Ravi, and N. Rangaraj, "Web based casting supplier evaluation using analytic hierarchy process," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol.52, No.5(2001), pp.511-522. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601124
  16. Bhattacharya, A., J. Geraghty, and P. Young, "Supplier selection paradigm;An integrated hierarchical QFD methodology under multiple- criteria environment," Applied Soft Computing, Vol.10(2010), pp.1013-1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2010.05.025
  17. Chen, S.M., "Evaluating weapon systems using fuzzy arithmetic operations", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.77(1996), pp.265-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(95)00096-8
  18. Chen, C.H. and Y. Lin, "Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.142, No.1(2002), pp.174-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00280-6
  19. Cheng, C.H., "Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 96, No.2(1997), pp.343-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00026-4
  20. Cheng, C.H., "Evaluating weapon systems using ranking fuzzy numbers," Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol.107(1999), pp.25-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00348-5
  21. Cheng, C.H., K.L. Yang, and C.L. Hwang, "Evaluating attack helicopters by AHP based on linguistic variable weight," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.116(1999), pp.423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00156-8
  22. Dagdeviren, M., S. Yavuz and N. Kilinc, "Weapon selection using the AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.36, No.4(2009), pp.8143-8151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.016
  23. Gencer, C. and D. GuNrpinar, "Analytic network process in supplier selection;A case study in an electronic firm," Applied Mathematical Modelling, Vol.31(2007), pp.2475-2486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2006.10.002
  24. Ho, W., X. Xu, and P. Dey, "Multi-criteria Decision Making Approaches for Supplier Evaluation and Selection;A Literature Review," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.202(2010), pp.16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009
  25. Huang, J.J., G.H. Tzeng and C.S. Ong, "Multidimensional data in multidimensional scaling using the analytic network process," Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol.26(2005), pp. 755-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2004.09.027
  26. Jiang, J., X. Li, Z. Zhou, D. Xu and Y. Chen, "Weapon system capability assessment under uncertainty based on the evidential reasoning approach," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.38(2011), pp.13773-13784.
  27. Lee, J., S.H. Kang, J. Rosenberger and S.B. Kim, "A hybrid approach of goal programming for weapon systems selection," Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol.58 (2010), pp.521-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2009.11.013
  28. Li, C.W. and G.H. Tzeng, "Identification of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum meam de-entropy algorithm to find critical services provided by a semiconductor intellectual property mall," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.36(2009), pp.9891-9898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.073
  29. Lin, Y.T., C.L. Lin, H.C. Yu and G.H. Tzeng, "A novel hybrid MCDM approach for outsourcing vendor selection;A case study for a semiconductor company in Taiwan," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.37, No.7 (2010), pp.4796-4804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.036
  30. Tsai, W.H. and W.C. Chou, "Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs;A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.36(2009), pp. 1444-1458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.11.058
  31. Tzeng, G.H., C.H. Chiang and C.W. Li, "Evaluating interwined effects in e-learning programs; A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.32, No.4(2007), pp.1028-1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.02.004
  32. Yahya, S. and B. Kingsman, "Vendor rating for an entrepreneur development programme ;A case study using the analytic hierarchy process method," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol.50, No.9(1999), pp.916- 930. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600797
  33. Yang, J.L. and G.H. Tzeng, "An integrated MCDM technique combined with DEMATEL for a novel cluster-weighted with ANP method," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38(2011), pp.1417-1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.048
  34. Wu. W.W., "Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.35(2008), pp.828-835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.07.025
  35. Wu, W.W. and Y.T. Lee, "Developing global managers' competencies using the fuzzy DE MATEL method," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.32, No.2(2007), pp.499-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005