The Influence of University Student's Self-Leadership on the Employment Strategies

대학생의 셀프리더십이 취업전략에 미치는 영향

  • Yi, Jung-Sun (Leadership education Graduate School of Social Education, Sookmyung Women's Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Kyoung-A (Sookmyung Global Leadership Institute, Sookmyung Women's Univ.)
  • 이정선 (숙명여자대학교 사회교육대학원 리더십교육전공) ;
  • 김경아 (숙명여자대학교 숙명리더십개발원)
  • Received : 2012.04.01
  • Accepted : 2012.05.15
  • Published : 2012.05.31

Abstract

Many students who attend university are worried about their future employment and academic achievement. Self-leadership is the ability to deal wisely with employment matters and to recognize the employment strategies of students who display self-leadership qualities. For this purpose, 320 questionnaires were distributed to students attending universities in Seoul. The 304 collected questionnaires were used as data for the final analysis. First, the university students' average self-leadership rate was 3.73, and their average employment rate was 3.24. In terms of self-leadership by subordinate domains, the most common strategy was to introduce "natural compensation activities", and the least common strategy was to focus on "inner compensation". For the employment strategy, "academic credit" was the best managed, and "active behavior" was the least well managed. Second, in terms of the differences in self-leadership due to social demographic variables, the self-leadership levels showed significant differences, according to their credits in general. Furthermore, they showed significant differences depending on gender and the leadership experience among the subordinate variables. Moreover, the university students' employment strategies showed significant differences according to gender, leadership experience and leadership education. Third, in terms of the difference between self-leadership and employment strategies due to psychological variables, self-efficacy and university-life satisfaction levels made significant differences in terms of self-leadership. Fourth, the group with high self-leadership levels also had highly developed employment strategies, compared to the group with low self-leadership levels. Fifth, after analyzing the social demographic variables, the psychological variables and the influence of self-leadership, it appears that the explanation level increased at each step. This study demonstrates that experiencing many opportunities that promote self-leadership during university causes students to worry about their future careers and prohibits them from developing into independent, responsible adults who can accomplish their goals.

Keywords