Journal of Korean Dental Science

Korean Academy of Dental Science (대한치의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Finite Element Analysis of Stress Distribution around Patterned Implants

  • Cho, Lee-Ra (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Huh, Yoon-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Kim, Dae-Gon (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • Received : 2011.12.05
  • Accepted : 2012.03.31
  • Published : 2012.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of patterning on the stress distribution in the bone tissue using the finite element analysis (FEA) model. Materials and Methods: For optimal comparison, it was assumed that the implant was axisymmetric and infinitely long. The implant was assumed to be completely embedded in the infinitely long cortical bone and to have 100% bone apposition. The implant-bone interface had completely fixed boundary conditions and received an infinitely big axial load. von Mises stress and maximal principal stress were analyzed. Conventional thread and 2 or 3 patterns on the upper and lower flank of the thread were compared. Result: The surface areas of patterned implants were increased up to 106~115%. The thread with patterns distributed stress better than conventional thread. Patterning in threads may produce more stress in the implant itself, but reduce stress in the surrounding bone. Stress patterns of von Mises stress were favorable with patterns, while the maximal principal stress was increased with patterns. Patterns in the lower flank showed favorable stress distribution. Conclusion: The patterns in implant thread reduce the stress generated in surrounding bone, but the number and position of patterns were crucial factors in stress distribution.

Keywords

References

  1. Chehroudi B, Gould TR, Brunette DM. Effects of a grooved titaniumcoated implant surface on epithelial cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res. 1989; 23: 1067-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820230907
  2. Brunette DM, Chehroudi B. The effects of the surface topography of micromachined titanium substrata on cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomech Eng. 1999; 121: 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2798042
  3. Itala AI, Ylänen HO, Ekholm C, Karlsson KH, Aro HT. Pore diameter of more than 100 microm is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001; 58: 679-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1069
  4. Hallgren C, Reimers H, Gold J, Wennerberg A. The importance of surface texture for bone integration of screw shaped implants: an in vivo study of implants patterned by photolithography. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001; 57: 485-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(20011215)57:4<485::AID-JBM1194>3.0.CO;2-1
  5. Hallgren C, Reimers H, Chakarov D, Gold J, Wennerberg A. An in vivo study of bone response to implants topographically modified by laser micromachining. Biomaterials. 2003; 24: 701-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00266-1
  6. Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noël B, Iost A, Hardouin P. Effect of grooved titanium substratum on human osteoblastic cell growth. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002; 60: 529-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10101
  7. Hansson S, Werke M. The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: the effect of thread size and thread profile: a finite element study. J Biomech. 2003; 36: 1247-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00164-7
  8. Hansson S, Ekestubbe A. Area moments of inertia as a measure of the mandible stiffness of the implant patient. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15: 450-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01021.x
  9. Brunski JB. Biomechanical considerations in dental implant design. Int J Oral Implantol. 1988; 5: 31-4.
  10. Steigenga J, Al-Shammari K, Misch C, Nociti FH Jr, Wang HL. Effects of implant thread geometry on percentage of osseointegration and resistance to reverse torque in the tibia of rabbits. J Periodontol. 2004; 75: 1233-41. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.9.1233
  11. Nentwig GH. Ankylos implant system: concept and clinical application. J Oral Implantol. 2004; 30: 171-7. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2004)30<171:TAISCA>2.0.CO;2
  12. Hall J, Miranda-Burgos P, Sennerby L. Stimulation of directed bone growth at oxidized titanium implants by macroscopic grooves: an in vivo study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005; 7 Suppl 1: S76-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00078.x
  13. Im SM, Kim DG, Park CJ, Cho LR, Um HS, Lee JK. A prospective clinical trial on the mg oxidized clinical implants. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci. 2011; 27: 25-39.
  14. Geng JP, Ma QS, Xu W, Tan KB, Liu GR. Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31: 233-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01213.x
  15. Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85: 585-98. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.115251
  16. Patra AK, DePaolo JM, D'Souza KS, DeTolla D, Meenaghan MA. Guidelines for analysis and redesign of dental implants. Implant Dent. 1998; 7: 355-68. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199807040-00015
  17. Sato Y, Teixeira ER, Tsuga K, Shindoi N. The effectiveness of a new algorithm on a three-dimensional finite element model construction of bone trabeculae in implant biomechanics. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26: 640- 3. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00442.x
  18. Siegele D, Soltesz U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989; 4: 333-40.
  19. Holloway I, Walter WL, Zicat B, Walter WK. Osteolysis with a cementless second generation metal-on-metal cup in total hip replacement. Int Orthop. 2009; 33: 1537-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0679-8
  20. Holmgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM, Mante F. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol. 1998; 24: 80-8. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(1998)024<0080:EPOODI>2.3.CO;2
  21. Mailath G, Stoiber B, Watzek G, Matejka M. Bone resorption at the entry of osseointegrated implants--a biomechanical phenomenon. Finite element study. Z Stomatol. 1989; 86: 207-16. [German]
  22. Rieger MR, Fareed K, Adams WK, Tanquist RA. Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 61: 223-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90379-X
  23. Bolind P, Johansson CB, Balshi TJ, Langer B, Albrektsson T. A study of 275 retrieved Brånemark oral implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005; 25: 425-37.