참고문헌
- Chehroudi B, Gould TR, Brunette DM. Effects of a grooved titaniumcoated implant surface on epithelial cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res. 1989; 23: 1067-85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820230907
- Brunette DM, Chehroudi B. The effects of the surface topography of micromachined titanium substrata on cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. J Biomech Eng. 1999; 121: 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2798042
- Itala AI, Ylänen HO, Ekholm C, Karlsson KH, Aro HT. Pore diameter of more than 100 microm is not requisite for bone ingrowth in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001; 58: 679-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.1069
- Hallgren C, Reimers H, Gold J, Wennerberg A. The importance of surface texture for bone integration of screw shaped implants: an in vivo study of implants patterned by photolithography. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001; 57: 485-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(20011215)57:4<485::AID-JBM1194>3.0.CO;2-1
- Hallgren C, Reimers H, Chakarov D, Gold J, Wennerberg A. An in vivo study of bone response to implants topographically modified by laser micromachining. Biomaterials. 2003; 24: 701-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00266-1
- Anselme K, Bigerelle M, Noël B, Iost A, Hardouin P. Effect of grooved titanium substratum on human osteoblastic cell growth. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002; 60: 529-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10101
- Hansson S, Werke M. The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: the effect of thread size and thread profile: a finite element study. J Biomech. 2003; 36: 1247-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00164-7
- Hansson S, Ekestubbe A. Area moments of inertia as a measure of the mandible stiffness of the implant patient. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15: 450-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01021.x
- Brunski JB. Biomechanical considerations in dental implant design. Int J Oral Implantol. 1988; 5: 31-4.
- Steigenga J, Al-Shammari K, Misch C, Nociti FH Jr, Wang HL. Effects of implant thread geometry on percentage of osseointegration and resistance to reverse torque in the tibia of rabbits. J Periodontol. 2004; 75: 1233-41. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.9.1233
- Nentwig GH. Ankylos implant system: concept and clinical application. J Oral Implantol. 2004; 30: 171-7. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2004)30<171:TAISCA>2.0.CO;2
- Hall J, Miranda-Burgos P, Sennerby L. Stimulation of directed bone growth at oxidized titanium implants by macroscopic grooves: an in vivo study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005; 7 Suppl 1: S76-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00078.x
- Im SM, Kim DG, Park CJ, Cho LR, Um HS, Lee JK. A prospective clinical trial on the mg oxidized clinical implants. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci. 2011; 27: 25-39.
- Geng JP, Ma QS, Xu W, Tan KB, Liu GR. Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31: 233-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01213.x
- Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85: 585-98. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.115251
- Patra AK, DePaolo JM, D'Souza KS, DeTolla D, Meenaghan MA. Guidelines for analysis and redesign of dental implants. Implant Dent. 1998; 7: 355-68. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199807040-00015
- Sato Y, Teixeira ER, Tsuga K, Shindoi N. The effectiveness of a new algorithm on a three-dimensional finite element model construction of bone trabeculae in implant biomechanics. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26: 640- 3. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00442.x
- Siegele D, Soltesz U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989; 4: 333-40.
- Holloway I, Walter WL, Zicat B, Walter WK. Osteolysis with a cementless second generation metal-on-metal cup in total hip replacement. Int Orthop. 2009; 33: 1537-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0679-8
- Holmgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM, Mante F. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis--a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J Oral Implantol. 1998; 24: 80-8. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(1998)024<0080:EPOODI>2.3.CO;2
- Mailath G, Stoiber B, Watzek G, Matejka M. Bone resorption at the entry of osseointegrated implants--a biomechanical phenomenon. Finite element study. Z Stomatol. 1989; 86: 207-16. [German]
- Rieger MR, Fareed K, Adams WK, Tanquist RA. Bone stress distribution for three endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 61: 223-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90379-X
- Bolind P, Johansson CB, Balshi TJ, Langer B, Albrektsson T. A study of 275 retrieved Brånemark oral implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005; 25: 425-37.