한국지반환경공학회 논문집 (Journal of the Korean GEO-environmental Society)

  • 제13권9호
  • /
  • Pages.5-16
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1598-0820(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2714-1233(eISSN)
한국지반환경공학회 (Korean Geo-Environmental Society)
권호 표지

다짐말뚝 재료로서 쇄석과 저회의 적정 혼합비 도출을 위한 실험적 연구

Experimental Study for the Development of the Mixing Ratio as a Compaction Pile

  • 임한수 (한양대학교 대학원 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 김선곤 (한양대학교 대학원 건설환경공학과) ;
  • 이주호 ((주)KCC건설) ;
  • 천병식 (한양대학교 공과대학 건설환경공학과)
  • 발행 : 2012.09.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

원지반을 절토하여 생성된 토질재료를 입도조절 없이 곧바로 성토재료로 사용하는 경우, 성토의 설계나 밀도관리를 위해 필요한 다짐특성이나 재료정수는 실내시험을 통해 구하는 것이 바람직하며, 이에 대한 연구가 수행되어 왔다. 그러나 선행된 연구는 주로 자연상태에 존재하는 입경이 상이한 혼합재료에 관련된 것으로, 최근 건설재료로 활발히 연구되고 있는 화력발전소 부산물인 석탄회를 활용한 연구는 전무한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 쇄석과 화력발전소에서 부산되는 저회를 혼합한 재료의 다짐에 의한 입자파쇄가 재료의 압축특성에 미치는 영향을 규명하기 위하여 다짐시험을 실시하여 기본적인 공학적 성질을 파악하였고, 일차원압축시험을 실시하여 다짐특성과 재료특성에 미치는 각 재료 혼합량의 영향을 파악하였다. 다짐시험 결과, 저회의 최적함수 비는 약 23%로 나타났고, 동일한 다짐에너지 및 함수비로 저회와 쇄석의 혼합비에 따른 다짐시험 결과 저회의 혼합율이 30%를 넘어서면 건조단위중량은 감소되는 경향을 나타내었고, 혼합율이 30%일 때 건조단위중량이 약 $1.81gf/cm^3$로 나타났다. 쇄석과 저회 의 혼합비에 따른 일차원압축시험 결과, 저회 100%의 경우 입자파쇄에 의한 간극비 변화가 가장 크게 나타났고, 쇄석 100%의 경우 가장 작게 나타났다. 쇄석과 저회 혼합재료의 경우, 저회 30%에서 압축지수가 가장 작게 나타나 혼합재료로서 공학적으로 가장 안정한 혼합비로 예상되었다.

In the case of using the soil materials created by cutting in-situ ground directly without adjusting particle size, it is recommendable to seek the compaction property or material constant required for filling design or density control through indoor test, and many studies on this subject have been carried out during that time. The researches conducted during that time, however, were focused on the mixed materials with different diameters that exist in a natural condition. There has been no study conducted using coal fly ash that is by-product of the thermal power plant that is actively considered as the building materials. Therefore, this study was aimed at implementing compaction test and examining the basic engineering property in order to explore the influence of crushing the particles through compacting the admixture of crushed stone and coal fly ash produced from thermal power plant on its engineering property, and then the impact of the admixture volume of each material on compaction property and material property by conducting the One-Dimensional Compression Test. As result of compaction test, the optimum moisture ratio of coal fly ash was shown to be approx. 23%. As result of compaction test in accordance with the mixed ratio of coal fly ash and crushed stone under the same compaction energy and moisture ratio, dry unit weight tended to drop when the mixed ratio of coal fly ash exceeded 30%, while it reached approx. $1.81gf/cm^3$ when the mixed ratio was 30%. As result of One-Dimensional Compression Test in accordance with the mixed ratio of crushed stone and coal fly ash, the change in void ratio by particle crushing was at the highest level in the case of coal fly ash 100%, while the lowest level in the case of crushed stone 100%. In the case of mixed materials of crushed stone and coal fly ash, compression index was at the lowest level in case of coal fly ash 30%, and therefore this ratio of mixed material was judged to be the most stable from an engineering aspect.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bedford, A. and Drumheller, D. S.(1983), Theory of Immiscible and Structured Mixtures, International Journal of Engineering Science., Vol. 21, No. 8, pp. 863-960. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7225(83)90071-X
  2. Biot, M. A.(1941), General Theory of Three-dimensional Consolidation, Journal of Applied Physics., Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 155-164. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712886
  3. Chang, N. Y., Yey, S. T., and Kaufman, L. P.(1982), Liquefaction Potential of Clean and Silty-sands, International Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering., Vol. 2, pp. 1018-1032.
  4. Chun B.S., Kim H.Y., Kuk K.K,. (2010), A Study on the Engineering Characteristics of Power Plant Coal Ash, Journal of the Korean Geoenvironmental Society, Vol.11, No. 5, pp. 25-34.
  5. Coussy, O., Dormieux, L. and Detournay, E.(1998), From Mixture Theory to Biot's Approach for Porous Media, International Journal of Solids and Structures., Vol. 35, No. 34-35, pp. 4619-4635. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00087-0
  6. Deere, D. U. and Patton, F. D.(1971), Slope Stability in Residual Soils, Proc. 5th Panamerican Conf. Soil Mech. Fnd. Eng., San Juan, Puerto, Vol. 1, pp. 87-170
  7. Dunn, A. J. and Mehuys, G. R.(1984), Relationship between Gravel Content of Soils and Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Laboratory Tests, Erosion and Productivity of Soils Containing Rock Fragments, SSSA Specl. Publ. No. 13, pp. 55-63.
  8. Fragaszy, R. J., Su, W. and Siddiqui, F.(1990), Effects of Oversize Particles on Density of Clean Granular Soils, Geotech Testing J., Vol.13, No. 2, pp. 106-114. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10701J
  9. Fragaszy, R. J., Su, J., Siddiqi, F. and Ho, C.(1993), Modeling Strength of Sandy Gravel, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering., Vol. 119, No. 11, pp. 1858-1859.
  10. Georgiannou, V. N., Burland, J. B. and Hight, D. W.(1990), The Undrained behavior of Clayey Sand in Triaxial Compression and Extension, Canadian Geotechnique, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.3.431
  11. Ham T. K., (2007), An Experimental Study on Compaction Characteristics of Gravel-mixed Decomposed Granite Soil, Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol. 23, No. 11, pp. 59-66.
  12. Humphres, H. W. (1957), A Method for Controlling Compaction of Granular Materials, Highway Research Board Bulletin., No. 159, pp. 41-57.
  13. Ishihara, K and Koseki, J.(1989), Discussion on Cyclic Shear Strength of Fines-containing Sands, Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Proc., XII Int. Conf. on Soil Mechanics, A. A. Balkema, Amsterdam, pp. 101-106.
  14. Ishihara, K.(1993), Liquefaction and Flow Failure during Earthquakes-the 33rd Rankine Lecture, Canadian Geotechnique, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 351-415. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.3.351
  15. Koester, J. P.(1994), The Influence of Fines Type and Content on Cyclic Strength, in Ground Failures under Seismic Conditions, Canadian Geotechnique. Spl. Publ., No. 44, S. Prakash, and P. Dakoulas, (eds.), ASCE, pp. 17-33.
  16. Kuerbis, R., Negussey, D. and Vaid, Y. P.(1988), Effect of Gradation and Fines Content on the Undrained Response of Sand, in Hydraulic Fill Structures, Geotech. Specl. Publ., No. 21, D.J.A. Van Zyl and S.G. Vick(eds.), ASCE, pp. 330-345.
  17. Kumar, G.V. and Muir, D.M.(1996), Mechanical Behavior of Mixtures of Kaolin and Coarse Sand, Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Mechanics of Granular and Porous Materials, pp. 57-68.
  18. Lade, P. V. and Yamamuro, J. A.(1997), Effects of Nonplastic Fines on Static Liquefaction of Sands, Canadian Geotechnique., Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 918-928. https://doi.org/10.1139/t97-052
  19. Polito, C. P.(1999), The Effects of Non-plastic and Plastic Fines on the Liquefaction Resistance of Sandy Soils, Ph. D Dissertation, Virginia Tech., pp. 24-32.
  20. Sladen, J. A., D'Hollander, R. D. and Krahnm J.(1985), Back Analysis of the Nerlerk Berm Liquefaction Slides, Canadian Geotechnique., Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 579-588. https://doi.org/10.1139/t85-077
  21. Stovall, T., De Larrard, F. and Buil, M.(1996), Linear packing density model of grain mixtures, Power tech., Vol. 48, pp. 1-12.
  22. Thevanayagam, S.(1998), Effect of Fines and Confining Stress on Undrained Shear Strength of Silty Sands, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering., Vol. 128, No. 10, pp. 849-859.
  23. Troncoso, J.H. and Verdugo, R.(1985), Silt Content and Dynamic behavior of Tailing Sands, Proc. 11th Intl. Conf. Son Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, pp. 1311-1314.
  24. Troncoso, J.H.(1990), Failure Risks of Abandoned Tailings Dams, Proceedings International Symposium on Safety and Rehabilitation of Tailings Dams, ICOLD, Sydney, Australia,, pp. 82-89.
  25. Truesdell, C. A. and Toupin, R.(1960), The non-linear field theories of mechanics, in Handbuch der Physik, Vol. III/3, S. Flugge(ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  26. Vaid, Y. P.(1994), Liquefaction of Silty Soils, in Ground Failures under Seismic Conditions, Geotech. Spl. Publ., No. 44, S. Prakash and P. Dakoulas(eds.), ASCE, pp. 1-16.
  27. Vallejo, L.E.(2000), Interpretation of the Limits in Shear Strength in Binary Granular Soil Mixtures, Journal of Canadian Geotechnique., Vol. 38, No. 5, pp. 1097-1104.
  28. Vallejo, L.E. and Mauby, R.(2000), Porosity Influence on the Shear Strength of Granular Material-clay Mixtures, Engineering Geology., Vol. 58, NO. 2, pp. 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(00)00051-X
  29. Walker, F. C and Holtz, W. G(1951), Control of Embankment Material by Laboratory Testing, Proc. ASCE, Vol. 77, No. 108, pp. 1-25.
  30. Yamamuro, J. A., and Lade, P. V.(1998), Steady-state Concepts and Static Liquefaction of Silty Sands, Journal of Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering., Vol. 124, No. 9, pp. 868-877. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:9(868)
  31. Yamamuro, J. A., Covert, K. M. and Lade, P. V.(1999), Static and Cyclic Liquefaction of Silty Sands, Proc., Int. Workshop on the Physics and Mechanics of Soil Liquefaction, P. V. Lade and J. A. Yamamuro, eds., Baltimore, pp. 55-65.
  32. Yasuda, S., Wakamatsu, K. and Nagase, H.(1994), Liquefaction of Artificially Filled Silty Sands, in Ground Failures under Seismic Conditions, Geotech. Spl. Publ,. No.44, S. Prakash and P. Dakoulas, ASCE, pp. 91-104.