Journal of Gifted/Talented Education (영재교육연구)

The Korean Society for the Gifted (한국영재학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The SMC Model: Identification of Artistically Gifted Students from Low Income Families

사회적 배려대상 예술영재 판별모형 개발

  • Received : 2012.02.09
  • Accepted : 2012.03.28
  • Published : 2012.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is about the development of an identification model for artistically gifted students from low income and/or multi-cultural families. Given that parental support at early ages is crucial for talent development, students from low income families are often dismissed in recognizing their artistic giftedness. Based on a comprehensive literature review and consultations with experts in art, the SMC model was developed to identify disadvantaged gifted students in the areas of music, visual arts, and ballet. The model consists of three steps of identification, such as review of documents and teacher recommendations, evaluations of artistic giftedness, and a summative evaluation, and involves multiple criteria for identifying giftedness in both domain general and domain specific arts. SMC is promising in discovering many unrecognized disadvantaged children of artistic potential, thereby using various quantitative and qualitative measures. Yet, issues of validity and reliability of SMC need to be substantiated by subsequent theoretical and empirical studies.

본 연구는 가정의 소득 수준과 다문화 가정환경을 고려하여 선발된 사회적 배려대상 초등학생들 중 음악, 시각예술, 발레 영역에서 예술적 잠재성을 보이는 예술영재를 판별하는 모형 개발에 관한 것이다. 연구에서 개발한 SMC모형은 예술적 기술, 동기, 창의성을 주요 판별 요소로 포함하며 문서 리뷰 및 교사 추천, 예술 영재성 평가, 종합 평가의 세 단계를 통해서 총체적, 영역 일반적 예술 영재성과 세부적, 영역 특수적 예술 영재성을 평가함으로써 아동의 예술적 잠재성을 조기에 인식하고 판별하는 것을 주된 목적으로 하고 있다. 사회적 배려대상 예술영재의 효과적인 판별은 숨어있는 다수의 잠재적 예술영재들의 발견을 통해서 예술영재교육의 대상과 범위를 확대시키고 이들의 영재성 계발을 가능하게 하는 후속 프로그램 개발에 유용한 정보를 제공해 줄 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 교육과학기술부 (2010). 다문화 가정 학생 현황. http://www.mest.go.kr/web/1111/ko/board/ view.do?bbsId=150&boardSeq=14710 (검색일: 2010. 12. 20).
  2. 김말복 (2003). 무용예술의 이해. 서울: 이화여자대학교 출판부.
  3. 문용린 (2004). 지력혁명. 서울: 비즈니스북스.
  4. 서울대 도덕심리연구실 (2003). MI적성진로진단검사. 서울: 대교.
  5. 이미경 (2007). 예술영재교육대상자 선발모형 개발 연구(II). 서울: 한국예술영재교연구원.
  6. 이미경 (2008). 시각예술영재의 잠재성에 근거한 선발 방법 연구-초등5-6학년을 중심으로. 서울: 한국예술영재교육연구원.
  7. 이미경 (2009). 음악영재교육을 위한 선발지침서 개발. 서울: 한국예술영재교육연구원.
  8. 이현주, 이미나, 이화선 (2010). 예술영재의 개인 및 환경적 특성 탐색: 음악, 미술, 무용 영재를 중심으로. 영재교육연구, 20(2), 547-570.
  9. 태진미 (2009). 국내 음악영재교육의 현황 및 발전방안 탐색. 영재교육연구, 19(3), 729- 758.
  10. 태진미 (2010). 영재의 창의성 신장을 위한 예술 활동의 가능성 탐색: 음악 활동을 중심 으로. 영재교육연구, 20(3), 789-807.
  11. 현경실 (2004). 한국 음악적성 검사. 서울: 학지사.
  12. 한국교육개발원 (2009). 북한이탈학생의 증가와 교육의 과제. http://www.kedi.re.kr/khome/ main/research/selectPubForm.do (검색일: 2010. 12. 21).
  13. 한국예술영재교육연구원 (2006). 예술영재교육 발전방안 연구. 서울: 문화관광부 문화예술 교육과.
  14. 한국예술영재교육연구원 (2011). 예술 영재의 특성. http://www.kiga.or.kr/education/edu03.jsp (검색일: 2011. 1. 13).
  15. Arts Connection (1992). Talent beyond words: Identifying and developing talent. Brooklyn, NY:The United States Department of Education Jacob Javits Gifted and Talented Program.
  16. Baum, S. M., Owen, S. V., & Oreck, B. A. (1996). Talent beyond words: Identification of potential talent in dance and music in elementary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629604000206
  17. Bloom, B. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. NY: Ballantine Books.
  18. Clark, G. A., & Wilson, T. (1991). Screening and identifying gifted/talented students in the visual arts with Clark's Drawing Ability Test. Roeper Review, 13, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199109553321
  19. Clark, G. A., & Zimmerman, E. (2001). Identifying artistically talented students in four rural communities in the United States. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620104500204
  20. Cramond, B., & Kim, K. H. (2008). The role of creativity tools and measures in assessing potential and growth In J. Van Tassel-Baska (Ed.), Alternative assessments with gifted and talented students (pp. 203-225). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  21. Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  22. Ford, D. Y., Harris III, J. J., Tyson, C. A., & Trotman, M. F. (2002). Beyond deficit thinking: Providing access for gifted African American students. Roeper Review, 24, 52-58.
  23. Frasier, M. M., & Passow, A. H. (1994). Toward a new paradigm for identifying talent potential. Storrs, CT: The University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
  24. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. NY: Basic Books.
  25. Haroutounian, J. (2002). Kindling the spark-recognizing and developing musical talent. New York: Oxford University Press.
  26. Haroutounian, J. (2008). Musical talent. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (pp. 449-467). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  27. Harrison, C. (2005). Young gifted children: Their search for complexity and connection. Canberra: Early Childhood Australia.
  28. Hurwitz, A. (1983). The gifted and talented in art: A guide to program planning. Worcester, MA: Davis.
  29. Kaufman, S. B., & Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Conception of giftedness. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children (pp. 71-91). NY: Springer Science+Business Media.
  30. Lee, S.-Y., Matthews, M. S., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2008). A national picture of talent search and talent search educational program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207311152
  31. Marland, S. P. J. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented. Report to the Congress of the United States by the U. S. Commissioner of Education (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
  32. Miller, R., & Gentry, M. (2010). Developing talents among high-potential students from low-income families in an out-of-school enrichment program. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 594-627. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1002100403
  33. Naglieri, J. A. (1997). Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.
  34. Ohnishi, T., Matsuda, H., Asada, T., Aruga, M., Hirakata, M., Nishikawa, M., et al. (2001). Functional anatomy of musical perception in musicians. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 754-760. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/11.8.754
  35. Oreck, B., Baum, S., & McCartney, H. (2000). Artistic talent development for urban youth: The promise and the challenge. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on Giftedness and Talent, University of Connecticut.
  36. Oreck, B. A., Owen, S. V., & Baum, S. M. (2003). Validity, reliability, and equity issues in an observational talent assessment process in the performing arts. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(1), 62-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700105
  37. Persson, R. S. (2009). The elusive muse: Understanding musical giftedness. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International handbook of giftedness (pp. 727-750). Dordrecht, NL: Springer Science.
  38. Pfeiffer, S. I., & Jarosewich, T. (2003). Gifted Rating Scales. San Antonio, TX: Psych Corp.
  39. Piirto, J. (2008). Giftedness in nonacademic domains. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research and best practices (pp. 367-386). New York: Springer.
  40. Reis, S. M., & Housand, A. M. (2008). Characteristics of gifted and talented learners: Similarities and differences across domains. In F. A. Karnes & K. R. Stephens (Eds.), Achieving excellence: Educating the gifted and talented (pp. 62-81). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  41. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  42. Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., Westberg, K. L., et al. (2002). Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
  43. Rogers, K. B. (2006). A menu for options for grouping gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock.
  44. Sousa, D. A. (2003). How the gifted brain learns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  45. Stambaugh, T. (2007). Next steps: An impetus for future directions in research, policy, and practice for low-income promising learners. In J. Van Tassel-Baska & T. Stambaugh (Eds.), Overlooked gems: A national perspective on low-income promising learners (pp. 83-88). Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
  46. Subotnik, R. F., Edmiston, A. M., Cook, L., & Ross, M. D. (2010). Mentoring for talent development, creativity, social skills and insider knowledge: The APA Catalyst Program. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 714-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1002100406
  47. Suzuki, S. (1983). Nurtured by Love: The classic approach to talent education. Smithtown, NY: Exposition Press.
  48. Swanson, J. D. (2006). Breaking through assumptions about low-income, minority gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(1), 11-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000103
  49. Torrance, E. P., Ball, O. E., & Safter, H. T. (1998). Torrance tests of creative thinking streamlined scoring guide figural A and B. Bensonville, IL: STS
  50. Valencia, R. R., & Suzuki, L. A. (2001). Intelligence testing and minority students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  51. Van Tassel-Baska, J., Feng, A., Quek, C., & Struck, J. (2004). A study of educators' and students' perceptions of academic success for underrepresented populations identified for gifted programs. Psychology Science, 46(3), 363-378.
  52. Van Tassel-Baska, J., Patton, J., & Prillaman, D. (1991). Gifted youth at risk: A report of a national study. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
  53. Webster, P. R. (1989). Creative thinking in music: The assessment question. In J. W. Richmond (Ed.), Proceedings of the Suncoast Music Education Forum on Creativity (pp. 40-75). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida.
  54. Winner, E. (1996a). The rage to master: The decisive case for talent in the visual arts. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and science, sports and games (pp. 271-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
  55. Winner, E. (1996b). Gifted children: Myths and realities. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  56. Winner, E. (2004). Art history can trade insights with the sciences. Chronicle of Higher Education, July 2, B10-12.
  57. Winner, E., & Martino, G. (1993). Giftedness in non-academic domains: The case of the visual arts and music. In K. Heller, F. Monks, R. J. Sternberg & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 95-110). Oxford: Elsevier.
  58. Worley II, B. B. (2008). Visual and performing arts. In J. A. Plucker & C. M. Callahan (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education: What the research says (pp. 735-747). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
  59. Wyner, J. S., Bridgeland, J. M., & Diiulio Jr., J. J. (2007). Achievement trap: How America is failing millions of high-achieving students from low-income families. Washington, DC: Jack Kent Cooke Foundation Civic Enterprises.
  60. Zimmerman, E. (1997). I don't want to sit in the corner cutting out valentines: Leadership roles for teachers of talented art students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 33-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629704100105