산업공학 (IE interfaces)

  • 제25권1호
  • /
  • Pages.96-105
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1225-0996(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6465(eISSN)
대한산업공학회 (Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

AHP를 이용한 국방정보기술표준 선정 평가 모델 개발에 관한 연구

A Study on the Development of Evaluation Model for Selecting a Standard for DITA using AHP

  • 김자희 (서울과학기술대학교 산업정보시스템공학과) ;
  • 김우제 (서울과학기술대학교 산업정보시스템공학과) ;
  • 조현기 (서울과학기술대학교 IT정책전문대학원) ;
  • 이은영 (서울과학기술대학교 IT정책전문대학원) ;
  • 서민우 (국방기술품질원)
  • Kim, Ja-Hee (Dept. of Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Woo-Je (Dept. of Industrial and Information Systems Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Cho, Hyun-Ki (Graduate School of Public Policy and Information Technology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lee, Eun-Young (Graduate School of Public Policy and Information Technology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Seo, Min-Woo (Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
  • 투고 : 2011.05.12
  • 심사 : 2011.09.14
  • 발행 : 2012.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Recently, the interoperability has become more important to enhance the net-centric capabilities of the warfighter. DITA (Defense Information Technical stAndard) is the set of IT standards for improving interoperability, scalability, effectiveness, and efficiency. In this paper, we analyzed the standardizing process to derive the selection criteria and structurized the derived selection criteria using the KJ (Kawakita Jiro) method. Finally, we developed an evaluation model for selecting a standard for DITA using AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). As a result, we present eight selection criteria (maintainability, trend, stability, portability, effect of other standard, constraint of the network, and applicability to the systems). We also applied some examples that several IT standards to our selection model for validating the model. We expect our model to help to decide objectively whether the new standard can be listed in DITA.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brown, D. and Smith, J. (2007), Finding the right standards, DSP Journal, January/March, 20-25.
  2. ISSC (2005), NATO C3 Technical Architecture Rationale for the Selection of NCSP Services and Standard, ISSC NATO Open Systems Working Group.
  3. Jung, W. M. and Gim, G. Y. (2007), An Empirical Study on the Development of KPI for National Defence Acquisition Activity, Journal of Social Science, 9, 245-276.
  4. Ju, J. C., Heo, H., Seo, M. W., Kim, K. H., and Lim, D. Y. (2009), A Survey and Future Direction on Standardization of Korean Armed Forces Tactical Data Link, Korea Computer Congress, 36(1-D), 90-94.
  5. Kang, S. H., Lee, K. S., and Lee, S. J. (2004), A Quantitative Quality Evaluation Model of Software Development Artifacts based on CBD, KIISE Conference, 31(2-II), 511-513.
  6. Kim, C. S. and Cho, K. K. (2008), A Study on the Development of Evaluation Indicators for the Proposals of National Defense Core-Technology R&D Projects, IE Interfaces, 21(1), 96-108.
  7. Kim, D. H., Shin, J. H., and Kim, C. K. (2007b), On the Development of the Authoritative Representations of Submarine for Engagement Level Simulation, Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation, 16(4), 1-12.
  8. Kim, K. H. and Lee, S. H. (2007a), Tag Code Select Method for National Defense RFID Application, KIISE Conference, 34(2-C), 125-129.
  9. Kim, H. R. and Choi, S. Y. (2009), A Study on the Investigation and Analysis of Defense Information Technical Standard Application, Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 12(3), 325-332.
  10. Kim, S. Y. (2009), A Study on the Development of Meta-Evaluation Indicators for Defense R&D Programs by Using FA/AHP Methods, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 12(1), 113-136.
  11. Kim, W. B. (2010), DITA Classification by Technology-Increase Convenience, ETNEWS, Available http://www.etnews.co.kr/news/detail.html?id=201001100084.
  12. Lee, C. H. (2000), Group Decision Making, Sejong Pub., Seoul, Korea.
  13. Lee, H. J., Kim, C. S., and Kim, W. J. (2009), The Development of Evaluation Indicators for the Performance of Defense Core-Technology R&D Projects Using SMR/AHP, Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 12(1), 70-79.
  14. Ministry of National Defense (2006), DITA Guideline v. 1.0, Seoul, Korea.
  15. Ministry of National Defense (2002), Next Generation Fighter Project-From Initiative To Contract, Korean Veterans Association Pub., Seoul, Korea.
  16. O'Conner, M. T. (2008), Interoperability Process and IT Standardization of US DOD, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, Seoul, Korea.
  17. Park, H. R. (2008), Defense Reform 2020 and Demands by the Information Age, Strategy Study, 43, 95-124.
  18. Park, K. S. and Son, H. (1996), A Study on the Criteria for Setting Priorities of Telecommunications Standardization Areas and Items, Conference of Korea Information and Communications Society, 502-507.
  19. Park, S. G., Choi, S. C., and Han, H. G. (2010), A Study on the Improvement of Defense Software Standards, Entrue Journal of Information Technology, l9(2), 155-165.
  20. Saaty, T. L. and Vargas, L. G. (2009), Model, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, USA.
  21. Seol, H. J., Kim, G. H., Jung, H. W., Cho, H. K., and Hwang, C. S. (2009), A Study on the Selection of Alternatives for Flight Attendants to Adapt Flying Conditions using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Journal of the Korea Institute of Military Science and Technology, 12(4), 460-468.