DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measure of Effectiveness for Detection and Cumulative Detection Probability

탐지효과도 및 누적탐지확률

  • 조정홍 (한국해양대학교 해양공학과) ;
  • 김재수 (한국해양대학교 해양공학과) ;
  • 임준석 (세종대학교 전자공학과) ;
  • 박지성 (한국해양대학교 해양공학과)
  • Received : 2012.05.14
  • Accepted : 2012.08.24
  • Published : 2012.10.05

Abstract

Since the optimized use of sonar systems available for detection is a very practical problem for a given ocean environment, the measure of mission achievability is needed for operating the sonar system efficiently. In this paper, a theory on Measure Of Effectiveness(MOE) for specific mission such as detection is described as the measure of mission achievability, and a recursive Cumulative Detection Probability(CDP) algorithm is found to be most efficient from comparing three CDP algorithms for discrete glimpses search to reduce computation time and memory for complicated scenarios. The three CDPs which are MOE for sonar-maneuver pattern are calculated as time evolves for comparison, based on three different formula depending on the assumptions as follows; dependent or independent glimpses, unimodal or non-unimodal distribution of Probability of Detection(PD) as a function of observation time interval for detection. The proposed CDP algorithm which is made from unimodal formula is verified and applied to OASPP(Optimal Acoustic Search Path Planning) with complicated scenarios.

Keywords

References

  1. M. W. Zynwalt, A. J. Korsakm, and R. S. Ratner, Appendix A Standard Antisubmarine Warfare Measures of Effectiveness and Measures of Performance, PEO (MUW) INST 3370.1, 2000.
  2. D. Jacques and R. Leblanc, "Effectiveness Analysis for Wide Area Search Munitions", in Proceedings of the AIAA Missile Sciences Conference, (Monterey, CA), 1998. 11.
  3. D. R. DelBalzo, K. P. Hemsteter, and D. P. Kierstead, "Improving ASW with GRASP Multi-Sensor Search Optimization", in Proceedings of the 6th conference Undersea Defense Technology Conference, 2001. 10.
  4. D. R. DelBalzo, K. P. Hemsteter, M. D. Wagstaff, E. R. Rike, and J. H. Leclere, "Environmental Effects on MCM Tactics Planning", MTS/IEEE Conference on Ocean, Vol. 3, pp. 1394-1399. 2002.
  5. D. R. DelBalzo and K. P. Hemsteter, "GRASP Multi-sensor Search Tactics against Evading Targets", Proceedings of the 2002 MTS/IEEE Conference on Oceans, pp. 29-31, 2002.
  6. K. P. Hemsteter and D. R. DelBalzo, "Acoustic Benchmark Validation of GRASP ASW Search Plans", MTS/IEEE Conference on Ocean, Vol. 1, pp. 60-64, 2002.
  7. D. P. Kierstead and D. R. DelBalzo, "A Genetic Algorithm Applied to Planning Search Paths in Complicated Environments", Military Operations Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 45-59, 2003. https://doi.org/10.5711/morj.8.2.45
  8. Jung-Hong Cho, Jea Soo Kim, Jun-Seok Lim, Seongil Kim, and Young-Sun Kim, "Optimal Acoustic Search Path Planning Based on Genetic Algorithm in Continuous Path System", OCEANS'2006 IEEE Asia Pacific-Singapore, pp. 116-117, May 2006.
  9. Jung Hong Cho, Jea Soo Kim, Jun-Seok Lim, Seongil Kim, and Young-Sun Kim, "Optimal Acoustic Search Path Planning for a Moving Target in Continuous Path", The 9th Western Pacific Acoustics Conference, June 26-28, 2006.
  10. Jung Hong Cho, Jea Soo Kim, Jun-Seok Lim, Seongil Kim, and Young-Sun Kim, "Optimal Acoustic Search Path Planning for Sonar System Based on Genetic Algorithm", International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 218-224, September 2007.
  11. Jung Hong Cho, Jea Soo Kim, Jun-Seok Lim, Seongil Kim, and Young-Sun Kim, "Optimal Acoustic Search Path Planning in Realistic Environments Based on Genetic Algorithm", Proceedings of OCEANS'08 MTS/IEEE KOBETECHNO- OCEAN'08(OTO'08) Conference, Kobe, Japan, April 8-11, 2008.
  12. Jung Hong Cho, JeaSoo Kim, and Seongil Kim, "Benchmarking of Optimal Acoustic Search Path Planning", Proceedings of the Nineteenth(2009) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, pp. 620-626, Osaka, Japan, June 21-26, 2009.
  13. Jung-Hong Cho, Mi-Ru Shin, Se-Hyun Oh, J. S. Kim, and Seongil Kim, "Optimal Search Path Planning for Single and Multi Sonar System", Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Underwater Acoustics, Vol. 3, pp. 1202-1208, Istanbul, Turkey, July 5-9, 2010.
  14. 김재수, 임준석, "다종 소나 운용에 대한 음향탐 지 효과도 분석 최종 보고서", 국방과학연구소, 2007. 10.
  15. 조정홍, "수중음향 모델링에 기반한 소나체계의 성능분석", 한국해양대학교 공학박사 학위논문, 2011. 8.
  16. 신미루, 조정홍, 김성일, 김재수, "탐지효과도 측정을 위한 누적탐지확률 계산 예제", 2010년 한국군사과학기술학회 종합학술대회, 2010. 6.
  17. D. H. Wagner, W. C. Mylander, and T. J. Senders, Naval Operations Analysis, Naval Institute Press. 3rd Ed., 1999.
  18. C. M. Ferla and M. B. Porter, "Receiver Depth Selection for Passive Sonar Systems", IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 261-278, 1991.
  19. R. J. Urick, Principles of Underwater Sound, 3rd Edition, McGraw-Hill Book company, 1983.
  20. J. S. Kim, Underwater Acoustics and Sonar Engineering, Korea Maritime Univ., Lecture Note, 2005.
  21. Jung Hong Cho, Seongil Kim, and Jea Soo Kim, "Optimal Acoustic Search Path Planning applied to Multi-sonar and Counter-Detection in Realistic Environment based on Evolutionary Algorithm", IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation, 2011. (submitted)