References
- 강원교육과학정보원 (2011). 즐거운 도전! 자유 탐구(중학생용 워크북).
- 교육과학기술부 (2008). 중학교 교육과정 해설 III: 수학, 과학, 기술∙가정. 대한교과서주식회사.
- 김재윤, 임희준 (2011). 초등학생들이 수행한 자유 탐구의 특징과 문제점 분석. 이화여자대학교 교과교육학연구, 15(2), 535-554.
- 박재용, 이기영 (2011). 중학교 과학 자유 탐구 수행 실태 및 교사와 학생의 인식. 이화여자대학교 교과교육학연구, 15(3), 603-632.
- 박종선, 송영욱, 김범기 (2011). 초등학생들이 선정한 자유탐구활동 주제 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 31(2), 143-152.
- 박종호, 김재영, 배진호 (2001). 자유탐구활동이 초등학생의 과학탐구능력과 과학적 태도에 미치는 영향. 초등과학교육, 20(20), 271-280.
- 변선미, 김현주 (2011). 자유 탐구 활동에 대한 중학생들의 인식 및 자유 탐구 활동이 중학생들의 과학 탐구능력에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 31(2), 210-224.
- 신재한 (2011). 스캐폴딩(scaffolding) 전략을 활 용한 수업 효과에 대한 메타 분석. 초등교육연구, 24(2), 25-46.
- 신현화, 김효남 (2010). 초등학교 과학과 자유탐구 활동에서 교사와 학생이 겪는 어려움 분석. 초등과학교육, 29(3), 262-276.
- 이순묵 (2000). 요인분석의 기초. 서울: 교육과학사.
- 임성만, 양일호, 김순미, 홍은주, 임재근 (2010). 초등 예비교사들이 자유 탐구 활동 중에 겪은 어려움 조사. 한국과학교육학회지, 30(2), 291-303.
- 정우경, 이준기, 오상욱 (2011). 중학교 학생들의 자유탐구활동 중 주제선정단계에서 나타난 어려움 조사. 한국과학교육학회지, 31(8), 1199-1213.
- 조희형, 김희경, 윤희숙, 이기영 (2011). 중학교 2.3학년 과학 자유탐구 교수.학습 및 평가. 서울대학교 과학교육연구소.
- 최정임, 엄미리, 허혜자 (2011). 디지털교과서를 위한 인지적 스캐폴딩 설계 원리 개발: 6학년 수학 분수단원을 중심으로. 교육방법연구, 23(1), 31-62.
- Access Center (2006). Science inquiry: The link to accessing the general education curriculum. Washington, DC: The Access Center.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science(AAAS), Project 2061. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Bean, T. W., & Patel Stevens, L. (2002). Scaffolding reflection for preservice and inservice teachers. Reflective Practice, 3(2), 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940220142343
- Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington D. C.: National Academy Press.
- Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer, Science Scope, 23(6), 42-44.
- Enkenberg, J. (2001). Instructional design and emerging models in higher education. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 495-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00021-8
- Flick, L. B., & Lederman, N. G. (2006). Scientific inquiry and nature of science(Implication for teaching, learning, and teacher education). Netherlands: Springer.
- German, P. J., Haskins, S., & Auls, S. (1996). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manulas: Promoting scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 475-499. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199605)33:5<475::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-O
- Gillies, R. M. (2008). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students'behaviours, discourse and learning during a science-based learning activity. School Psychology International, 29(3), 328- 347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034308093673
- Greenfield, P. M. (1984). A theory of teacher in the learning activities of everyday life. In B. Rogoff&J. Lave (Eds), Everyday cognition: In development in social context(pp. 117-138). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Gregory, G. H., & Chapman, C. M. (2006). Differentiated Instructional Strategies: One Size Doesn't Fit All(2nd Ed), California: Corwin Press.
- Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(3), 37 52.
- Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G. & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
- Klentschy, M., & Thompson, L. (2008). Scaffolding Science Inquiry Through Lesson Design. NH: Heinemann.
- Maybin, J., Mercer, N., & Steirer, B. (1992). 'Scaffolding'learning in the classroom. In K. Norman (Ed.). Thinking voices: The work of the National Curriculum Project. London:Hodder and Stoughton for the National Curriculum Council, London.
- McLoughlin, C. (2002). Learning support in distance and networked learning environments: Ten dimensions for successful design. Distance Education, 23(2), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791022000009178
- National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345-375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.345
- Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehensionfostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117- 175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
- Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding critical reasoning about history and social issues in multimedia-supported learning environments. ETR&D, 50(3), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505026
- Stone, C. A. (1993). What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In E. A. Forman & N. Minick & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 169-183). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 344-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949803100404
- Tomkins, S. P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Looking for ideas: Observation, interpretation and hypothesis-making by 12 year-old pupils undertaking science investigations. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 791-813. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690119322
- Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed-Ability Classrooms (2nd Edition). Alexandria: ASCD.
- Van der Valk, T., & De Jong, O. (2008). Scaffolding Science Teachers in Open-inquiry Teaching). International Journal of Science Education, iFirst Article, 1-22.
- Vasques, J. A. (2008). Tools & Traits: Highly effective science teaching, K-8. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
- Verenikina, I. (2003). Understanding Scaffolding and the ZPD in Educational Research. Conference papers of AARE(Australian Association for Research in Education), http://aare.edu.au.
- Weinstein C. S. (1989). Teacher Education Students'Preconceptions of Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 53-60.
- Wellington, J., & Ireson, G. (2008). Science learning, science teaching. London: Routledge.
- Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Cited by
- 과학영재의 자유탐구를 안내하는 연구단계별 질문목록 개발 vol.24, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9722/jgte.2014.24.1.63
- 학생의 열린 과학 탐구 보고서 작성을 돕기 위한 점검표 개발 vol.35, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.6.1075
- 고등학생들의 통합 탐구 기능 향상을 위한 인지적 스캐폴딩 도구 개발 및 적용 vol.39, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.4.545