Virtual Surgical Planning and Stereolithography-guided Osteotomy for 3 Dimensional Mandibular Reconstruction with Free Fibula Osseous Flaps: A Case Report

비골을 이용한 3차원적 하악골 재건 시 가상모의수술 및 입체조형기법을 이용한 골절단 가이드의 활용: 증례보고

  • Nam, Woong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Makhoul, Nicholas (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Michigan College of Dentistry) ;
  • Ward, Brent (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Michigan College of Dentistry) ;
  • Helman, Joseph I. (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Michigan College of Dentistry) ;
  • Edwards, Sean (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Michigan College of Dentistry)
  • 남웅 (연세대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • ;
  • Received : 2012.06.12
  • Accepted : 2012.08.27
  • Published : 2012.09.30

Abstract

The osseous or osteocutaneous free fibula flap has become the gold standard for most mandibular reconstructions because of its favorable osseous characteristics. However, disadvantages, such as the time-consuming reconstructive step, difficulty in performing the osteotomies to precisely recreate the shape of the missing segment of mandible and poor bone-to-bone contact play a role in making the surgeons look for alternative flaps. With the advent of computerized design software, which accurately plans complex 3-dimensional reconstructions, has become a process that is more efficient and precise. However, the ability to transfer the computerized plan into the surgical field with stereolithographic models and guides has been a significant development in advancing reconstruction in the maxillofacial regions. The ability to "pre-plan" the case, mirror and superimpose natural structures into diseased and deformed areas, as well as the ability to reproduce these plans with good surgical precision has decreased overall operative time, and has helped facilitate functional and esthetic reconstruction. We describe a complex case treated with this technique, showing the power and elegance of computer assisted maxillofacial reconstruction from the University of Michigan, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Keywords

References

  1. Hallermann W, Olsen S, Bardyn T, Taghizadeh F, Banic A, Iizuka T. A new method for computer-aided operation planning for extensive mandibular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:2431-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000219076.83890.e8
  2. Hirsch DL, Garfein ES, Christensen AM, Weimer KA, Saddeh PB, Levine JP. Use of computer-aided design and computer- aided manufacturing to produce orthognathically ideal surgical outcomes: a paradigm shift in head and neck reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2115-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.02.007
  3. Sharaf B, Levine JP, Hirsch DL, Bastidas JA, Schiff BA, Garfein ES. Importance of computer-aided design and manufacturing technology in the multidisciplinary approach to head and neck reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:1277-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181e1b5d8
  4. Pogrel MA, Podlesh S, Anthony JP, Alexander J. A comparison of vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts for reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:1200-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90165-8
  5. Marchetti C, Bianchi A, Mazzoni S, Cipriani R, Campobassi A. Oromandibular reconstruction using a fibula osteocutaneous free flap: four different "preplating" techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:643-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000233211.54505.9a
  6. Hidalgo DA, Pusic AL. Free-flap mandibular reconstruction: a 10-year follow-up study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:438-49. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200208000-00010
  7. Cordeiro PG, Disa JJ, Hidalgo DA, Hu QY. Reconstruction of the mandible with osseous free flaps: a 10-year experience with 150 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1314-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199910000-00011
  8. Hidalgo DA. Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;84:71-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198907000-00014
  9. Wang TH, Tseng CS, Hsieh CY, et al. Using computer-aided design paper model for mandibular reconstruction: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2534-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.033
  10. Ewers R, Schicho K. Augmented reality telenavigation in cranio maxillofacial oral surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;150:24-5.
  11. Juergens P, Krol Z, Zeilhofer HF, et al. Computer simulation and rapid prototyping for the reconstruction of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;67:2167-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.04.104
  12. Rana M, Essig H, Eckardt AM, et al. Advances and innovations in computer-assisted head and neck oncologic surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:272-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241bac7
  13. Leiggener C, Messo E, Thor A, Zeilhofer HF, Hirsch JM. A selective laser sintering guide for transferring a virtual plan to real time surgery in composite mandibular reconstruction with free fibula osseous flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:187-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.11.026
  14. Levine JP, Patel A, Saadeh PB, Hirsch DL. Computer-aided design and manufacturing in craniomaxillofacial surgery: the new state of the art. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:288-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241ba92
  15. Ewers R, Schicho K, Undt G, et al. Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computer-assisted navigation technology: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2004.03.018