Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지

An effect of Dentin Bonding Procedure on the Shear Bond Strength of Resin Cement to Porcelain Restoration

도재 수복물 합착시 상아질 접착 술식이 레진 시멘트의 전단결합강도에 미치는 영향

  • Kang, Hae-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, College of dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Shin, Soo-Yeon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 강혜진 (단국대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 신수연 (단국대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Received : 2012.01.22
  • Accepted : 2012.03.25
  • Published : 2012.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were differences in shear bond strength to human dentin using IDS technique compared with DDS. Forty freshly extracted human molars were and devided into 4 groups. The control group specimens were, on the morrow of tooth preparation, light-cured after application of dentin bonding agent and cemented with resin cement. The IDS/SE(immediate dentin sealing, Clearfil$^{TM}$ SE Bond) and IDS/SB (immediate dentin sealing, Adapter$^{TM}$ Single Bond 2) specimens were, on the morrow of tooth preparation, light-cured after application of dentin bonding agent(Clearfil$^{TM}$ SE Bond and Adapter$^{TM}$ Sing Bond 2, respectively), whereas DDS specimens were not treated with any dentin bonding agent. IDS/SE, IDS/SB and DDS specimens were thermocycled. Following that delay, specimens were cemented with resin cement. The dentin bonding agent was left unpolymerized until the application of porcelain restoration. Shear bond strengths were measured using a universal testing machine. Specimens also were evaluated for mode of fracture using an optical microscope. The mean shear bond strengths of control group and IDS/SE groups were not statistically different from one another. The bond strength of IDS/SE group had a significantly higher mean than that of DDS group. There was no significant difference in the mean shear bond strength between IDS/SB(4.11MPa) and DDS group. The evaluation of failure modes indicates that most failures in the control group and IDS/SE groups were mixed, whereas failures in the DDS group were interfacial. When preparing teeth for indirect ceramic restoration, IDS with Clearfil$^{TM}$ SE Bond results in improved shear bond strength compared with DDS.

본 연구에서는 Clearfil$^{TM}$ SEBond와 Adapter$^{TM}$ SingleBond2를 사용하여 즉시 상아질 접착을 하였을 때 지연 상아질 접착을 하였을 때와 비교해 전단결합강도 및 파절 양상을 관찰하였다. 발치된 구치를 네 군으로 나누어 1군은 대조군으로 치아 삭제 직후 시편을 상아질 접착제를 광중합 후 합착하였고 2군과 3군은 치아 삭제 직후 각각 Clearfil$^{TM}$ SEBond와 Adapter$^{TM}$ SingleBond2로 즉시 상아질 접착을 한 후 열 순환기에 교대침수 시키고 상아질 접착제를 광중합하지 않고 합착하였다. 4군은 삭제 후 아무 처리를 하지 않고 열 순환 후 상아질 접착제를 광중합하지 않고 합착하였다. 이후 만능 시험기로 모든 시편의 전단결합강도를 측정하였으며, 광학현미경으로 파절 양상을 관찰하였다. 측정 결과 대조군이 가장 높은 결합력을 보였고 지연 상아질 접착을 시행한 군에서 가장 낮은 결합력을 보였다. Clearfil$^{TM}$ SEBond로 즉시 상아질 접착을 한 군은 대조군과 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았고, 4군보다 유의하게 높은 결합력을 보였다. Adapter$^{TM}$ SingleBond2를 이용하여 즉시 상아질 접착을 한 군은 4군보다 높은 결합력을 보였으나 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 파절 양상에서는 대조군과 2군이 4군에 비해 유의하게 혼합형 파절이 많이 나타났다(p<0.05). 이상의 결과로 보아, 도재 수복물의 합착에 있어서 치아 삭제 후 즉시 상아질 접착제를 적용하는 것이 바람직하다고 사료된다. 하지만 이때 사용되는 상아질 접착제의 선택에 있어서는 실제 임상 조건에서의 더 많은 연구가 필요하리라 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:111-21.
  2. Frankenberger R, Sindel J, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 1999; 24:147-55.
  3. Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD et al. Dentin permeability: sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent 1992;17:13-20.
  4. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990;69:1652-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690100501
  5. McCabe JF, Rusby S. Dentin bonding-the effect of pre-curing the bonding resin. Br Dent J 1994;176:333-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808447
  6. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:1033-42. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106609.x
  7. Bertschinger C, Paul SJ, Luthy H, Schärer P. Dual application of dentin bonding agents: Its effect on the bond strength. Am J Dent 1996;9:115-119.
  8. Paul SJ, Schärer P. The dual bonding technique: A modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:536-45.
  9. Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:144-55.
  10. Ozturk N, Aykent F. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:275-81. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.37
  11. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Efficacy of a resin coating on bond strengths of resin cement to dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15:105-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00325.x
  12. Paul SJ, Schärer P. Effect of provisional cements on the bond strength of various adhesive bonding systems on dentinine. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:8-14. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00484.x
  13. Jayasooriya PR, Pereira PN, Nikaido T et al. The effect of a "resin coating" on the interfacial adaptation of composite inlays. Oper Dent 2003;28:28-35.
  14. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Garberoglio R, Davidson CL. Dentin contamination protection after mechanical preparation for veneering. Am J Dent 1996;9:57-60.
  15. Dumfahrt H. Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: part II-clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13; 9-18.
  16. Friedman MJ. A 15-year review porcelain veneer failure- a clinician's observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19:625-28.
  17. Inokoshi S, Willems G, Van Meerbeek B et al. Dual-cure luting composites: Part I: Filler particle distribution J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:133-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1993.tb01597.x
  18. Sjögren G, Molin M, Van Dijken J, Bergman M. Ceramic inlay(Cerec) cemented with either a dual-cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. A 2-year clinical study. Acta Odontol Scad 1995;53:325-30. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359509005995
  19. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D et al. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:511-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.010
  20. Magne P, Perroud R, Hodges JS, Belser UC. Clinical perfomance of novel-design porcelain veneers for the recovery of coronal volume and length. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:440-57.
  21. Magne P, So WS, Cascionr D. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration. J Prosthe Dent 2007;98:166-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60052-3
  22. Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B et al. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomaterials 2005;26:6449-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.052
  23. Lee SY, Greener EH, Covey DA, Menis DL. Effects of food/oral simulating fluids on microstructure and strength of dentin bonding agent. J Oral Rehabil 1997;23:353-61.
  24. Miyazaki M, Ando S, Jiniura K et al. Influence of filler addition to bonding agents on shear bond strength to bovine dentin. Dent Mater 1995;11:234-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80055-7
  25. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrates. I. Bonding to dentin. Quintenssence Int 1992;23:39-41.
  26. Ferrari M, Tay FR. Technique sensitivity in bonding to vital, acid, etched dentin. Oper Dent 2003;28:3-8.
  27. Watanabe I, Nakayabashi N, Pasley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994;73:1212-1220. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730061301
  28. Tay FR, Gwinnett JA, Wei SH. Micromorphological spectrum from over drying to over-wetting acid conditioned dentin in water-free acetone-based single bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 1996;12:236-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80029-7
  29. Burrow MF, Inokoshi S, Tagami J. Water sorption of several bonding resins. Am J Dent 1999;12:295-8.
  30. Suh BI. Oxygen-inhibited layer in adhesion dentistry. J Esthe Restor Dent 2004;16:316-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2004.tb00060.x
  31. Papacchini F, Dall'Oca S, Chieffi N et al. Compositeto- composite microtensile bond strength in the repair of a microfilled hybrid resin: effect of surface treatment and oxygen inhibition. J Adhes Dent 20007;9:25-31.