DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pedagogically-Driven Courseware Content Generation for Intelligent Tutoring Systems

  • Received : 2012.02.05
  • Accepted : 2012.03.15
  • Published : 2012.03.25

Abstract

This paper describes a novel approach to adaptive courseware generation. This approach adopts its structure from existing intelligent tutoring systems and introduces a new component called pedagogical scenario model to support pedagogical flexibility in the adaptation process of courseware generation system. The adaptation is carried out using Dynamic Constraint Satisfaction Problem framework, which is a variant of classical Constraint Satisfaction Problem, to deliver courseware tailored to individual learner. Such a framework provides a high level of expressiveness to deal with the particular characteristics of courseware generation problem. Further, it automatically designs a sound courseware satisfying the design constraints imposed by the domain, the pedagogical scenario and learner models.

Keywords

References

  1. A.L. Franzoni and S. Assar, "Student Learning Styles Adaptation Method Based on Teaching Strategies and Electronic Media," International journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 15-29, 2009.
  2. K. A. Papanikolaou, M. Grigoriadou, H. Kornilakis and G. Magoulas, "Personalizing the Interaction in a Web-based Educational Hypermedia System: the case of INSPIRE". International Journal of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 13, pp. 213-267, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024746731130
  3. J. Vassileva, "DCG+GTE: Dynamic courseware generation with teaching expertise," International Journal of Instructional Science, vol. 26, pp. 317-332, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003015532585
  4. C. Ullrich and E. Melis, "Pedagogically founded courseware generation based on HTN-planning," International Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, pp. 9319-9332, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.12.043
  5. P. Brusilovsky and J. Vassileva, "Course sequencing techniques for large-scale web-based education," International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, vol. 13, no.1/2, pp. 75-94, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCEELL.2003.002154
  6. P. Brusilovsky, "Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia," User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Journal, vol. 6, no. 2-3, pp. 87-129, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00143964
  7. H. Chorfi and M. Jemni, "PERSO: Towards an adaptive elearning system," Journal of Interactive Learning Research, vol. 15, no. 4, pp 433-447, 2004.
  8. P. Karampiperis and D. Sampson, "Adaptive Learning Resources Sequencing in Educational Hypermedia Systems," International Journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 128-147, 2005.
  9. P. Mohan, J. Greer and G. McGalla, "Instructional Planning with Learning Objects," In Proc. of the Workshop on Knowledge Representation and Automated Reasoning for E-Learning Systems, Acapulco, 2003.
  10. M.-A. Sicilia, S. Sanchez-Alonso and E. Garcia- Barriocanal, "On supporting the process of learning design through planners," In Virtual Campus 2006 Postproceedings, 2006.
  11. E. Melis, E. Andres, J. Budenberder, A. Frishaud, G. Goguadse, P. Libbrecht, M. Pollet and C. Ullrich, "ActiveMath: A generic and adaptive web-based learning environment," International journal of AI in Education, vol. 12, no. 4, 2001.
  12. D. Vassileva and B. Bontechev, "Self adaptive hypermedia navigation based on learner model characters," In Proc. of IADAT, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 46-52, 2006.
  13. O. Conlan, D. Lewis, S. Higel, D. O'Sullivan and V. Wade, "Applying adaptive hypermedia techniques to semantic web service decomposition," In Proc. of AH2003: Workshop on adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web-based systems, pp. 53-62, 2003.
  14. IMS Learning Design Information Model, http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign/ldv1p0/imsld_inf ov1p0.html
  15. B.S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York: David Mckay, 1956.
  16. R. Heinich, M. Molenda, J. D. Russell and S. E. Smaldino, Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning, Prentice-Hall, 1999.
  17. P. Brusilovsky and E. Millan, "User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems," In The Adaptive Web, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4321, pp. 3-53, Springer, 2007.
  18. R. Felder and L. Silverman, "Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education," Engineering Education, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 674-681, 1988.
  19. K. Kang, S. Cohen, J. Hess, W. Novak and S. Peterson, "Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study," Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1990.
  20. LOM, Draft Standard for Learning Object Metadata, http://Itsc.ieee.org/wg12/index.html
  21. I. Miguel, Dynamic Flexible Constraint Satisfaction and Its Application to AI Planning, PhD thesis, Springer, ISBN1-85233-764-8, 2004.
  22. T. Soininen and E. Gelle, "Dynamic constraint satisfaction in configuration," AAI Technical Report WS-99-05, pp. 419-434, 1999.
  23. T. Soininen, E. Gelle and I. Niemla, "A fixpoint definition of dynamic constraint satisfaction," In Proc. of Constraint Programming, pp. 419-434, 1999.
  24. S. Mittal and B. Falkenhainer, "Dynamic constraint satisfaction problems", In Proc. of 8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 25-32, 1990.
  25. S. Kambhampati, , "Planning Graph as a (Dynamic) CSP: Exploiting EBL, DDB and other CSP Search Techniques in Graphplan," Journal of Artificial intelligence Research, vol. 12, pp. 1-34, 2000.
  26. CHOCO CSP Solver, http://www.emn.fr/x-info/chocosolver/
  27. J.S. Kim, "A Knowledge Conversion Tool for Expert Systems," International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems, vol.11, no.1, pp.1-7, March 2011. https://doi.org/10.5391/IJFIS.2011.11.1.001