Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering (한국소음진동공학회논문집)

The Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering (한국소음진동공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of the Properties of Sound Source and Transmission for the Evaluation of Subjective Response by the Exposure Time of Transportation Noise

교통소음의 노출시간에 따른 주관반응 평가시 음원 및 전달 특성의 효과 분석

  • Received : 2011.12.23
  • Accepted : 2012.03.06
  • Published : 2012.03.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Evaluation on the environmental noise is carried out by surveying subjective response of residents with physical measurement of noise during long period in field. Particularly field survey is used to make regulations from the analysis on how many people are annoyed for specific noise level, and laboratory test used to analyze the relationship between physical parameters of noise and subjective responses. In the laboratory controlling the variables is easy but the results could be biased because the condition in room would be different with field. Most of all noise exposure time is considered to be different with real situation, and this study aimed to evaluate the subjective response by exposure time of transportation noise, by applying three kinds of variable how much they give effects on the annoyance as the exposure time is operating condition, windows type and sound level. As a result there was somewhat difference between operating type and annoyance, which is caused by the sound characteristics operated in different condition. However the window type didn't give much effect to the annoyance as much as sound type. This means that the subjective response could give similar result by exposure time even for different window types. Most of all, the main factor affecting subjective response is considered to be the sound level and the exposure time.

Keywords

References

  1. Song, G. G., et. al., 2011, Variations of Subjective Response to Environmental Noise, Proc. KSNVE Annual Spring Conference, pp. 181-186.
  2. Fred, L. H., 1984, Community Response to Noise: Is All Noise the Same?, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. Vol. 76, No. 4, pp. 1161-1168. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.391408
  3. Skanberg, A. and Ohrstrom, E., 2006, Sleep Disturbances from Road Traffic Noise: A Comparison between Laboratory and Field Settings, J. Sound Vib., Vol. 290, pp. 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.03.017
  4. Barbara, G., Anke, M. and Sibylle, R., 2006, Noise Emitted from Road, Rail and Air Traffic and Their Rffects on Sleep, J. Sound Vib., Vol. 295, pp. 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.12.052
  5. Theodore, J. S., 1978, Synthesis of Social Surveys on Noise Annoyance, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 377-405. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.382013
  6. Fieldsm J. M. and Walker, J. G., 1982, Comparing the Relationships between Noise Level and Annoyance in Different Surveys: A Railway Noise vs. Aircraft and Road Traffic Comparison, J. Sound Vib., Vol. 81, No. 1, pp. 51-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(82)90177-8
  7. Henk, M. E. M., 2004, Relationship between Exposure to Multiple Noise Sources and Noise Annoyance, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 116, No. 2, pp. 949-957. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1766305
  8. Hur, D. J., et. al., 2007, Study on the Subjective Responses of Loudness and Annoyance according to Exposed Time for the Traffic Noise, Transactions of the Korean Society for Noise and Vibration Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 241-248. https://doi.org/10.5050/KSNVN.2007.17.3.241
  9. Kim, S.-W., et. al., 2010, Effects of Transportation Noise Exposure Time on the Subjective Response, Proc. 20th International Congress on Acoustics.
  10. Hugo, F., et. al., 1996, Assessing the Railway Bonus in Laboratory Studies, J. Acoust. Soc. Jpn., Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1250/ast.17.139
  11. Dieter, G., 1995, Regulations for Community Noise, Noise/News International, pp. 223-235.
  12. Bert De Coensel, et. al., 2007, Experimental Investigation on Noise Annoyance Caused by High-speed Trains, Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 93, pp. 589-601.
  13. Hiramatsu, K., et. al., 1978, The Effect of Sound Duration on Annoyance, J. Sound Vib. Vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 511-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(78)80131-X
  14. Zimmer, K., et. al., 2008, The Role of Task Interference and Exposure Duration in Judging Noise Annoyance, J. Sound Vib., Vol. 311, pp. 1039-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.10.002
  15. Poulsen, T., 1991, Influence of Session Length on Judged Annoyance, J. Sound Vib., Vol. 145, No. 2, pp. 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460X(91)90588-B
  16. Berglund, B., et. al., 1999, Guidelines for Community Noise, WHO.
  17. Namba, S., Kuwano, S. and Fastl, H., 1988, Loudness of Road Traffic Noise Using the Method of Continuous Judgment by Category, Proc. Noise, Vol. 88, pp. 241-246.