DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Psychosocial Stress and Related Factors among High School Students in a City

도시지역 고등학생들의 사회심리적 스트레스 수준과 그의 관련요인

  • Shin, Eun-Sook (Department of Health Administration, Joongbu University) ;
  • Cho, Young-Chae (Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Chungnam National University School of Medicine and Research Institute for Medical Sciences)
  • 신은숙 (중부대학교 보건행정학과) ;
  • 조영채 (충남대학교 의학전문대학원 예방의학교실 및 의학연구소)
  • Received : 2011.12.02
  • Accepted : 2012.02.10
  • Published : 2012.02.29

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the degree of psychosocial stress and its related factors. The self-administered questionnaires were delivered to 514 high school students of both sexes in Daejon city during the period from April 1 to May 31, 2011. As a results, the degree of psychosocial stress of study subjects was 6.4% in healthy group, 72.4% in latent stress group, 21.2% in high risk stress group. The high risk stress group was significantly high in the group of worse relation with friend, lower satisfaction with the school life, none of siblings and lower satisfaction with the home life. The odds ratio of the high risk stress group significantly increased in the worse relation with friend, lower satisfaction with the school life, none of siblings and lower satisfaction with the home life than their respective counterparts. Multiple regression analysis showed that the major variables of influence on psychosocial stress included satisfaction of school life, friendship with the school fellow, number of siblings and satisfaction of home life.

본 연구는 도시지역 고등학생들의 사회심리적 스트레스 수준을 파악하고 그에 관련된 요인을 규명하고자 대전광역시의 남 여 고등학생 514명을 대상으로 2011년 4월 1일부터 5월 31일까지의 기간 동안에 표준화된 자기기입식 설문지를 사용하여 설문조사하였다. 연구결과, 조사대상 학생들의 사회심리적 스트레스 수준은 건강군이 6.4%, 잠재적 스트레스 군이 72.4%, 고위험스트레스 군이 21.2%로 나타났다. 일반적 특성별 고위험스트레스 군의 분포는 교우관계 가 좋지 않다는 군에서, 학교생활에 만족하지 못한다는 군에서, 형제자매가 없다는 군에서, 가정생활에 만족하지 못한다는 군에서 유의하게 높았다. 로지스틱 회귀분석 결과 고위험스트레스 군에 속할 교차비는 교우관계가 좋다는 군보다 좋지 않다는 군에서, 학교생활에 만족한다는 군보다 만족하지 못한다는 군에서, 형제자매가 있다는 군보다 없다는 군에서, 가정생활에 만족한다는 군보다 만족하지 못한다는 군에서 유의하게 증가하였다. 단계별 다중회귀분석 결과 사회심리적 스트레스 수준에 영향을 미치는 요인으로는 학교생활만족도, 교우관계, 형제자매유무 및 가정생활만족도가 유의한 변수로 선정되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee KS, Ha YS, Kom MJ, Noh CH, Yang S, Lee JS, Lim YS. Psychiatric mental helath nursing. Seoul, Hyunmoon, 2000.
  2. Ikeda J, Yoneyama K, Shishioka I. Dietary habits, lifestyle and physical condition of junior high school students. Japanese J of Public health, 45(12):1099-1114, 1998.
  3. Kang SK. A qualitative study of social network intervention for young adults with mental illness. Mental Health Soc Work, 13:121-139, 2002.
  4. Kim EH. A research on self-esteem and mental health of high school student-comparision academic high school with vocational high school. Graduate School of Korea University, Master's Thesis, 2000.
  5. Kang SH, Moon ES, Cha MY. The structural relationships among life event stress, social support, depression and suicidal ideation: a comparison of boy and girl high school students. The Korean J of Educational Psychology, 25(2): 277-293, 2011.
  6. Kazdin AE. Adolescents mental health; prevention and treatment programs. American Psychologist, 48:127-141, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.127
  7. Kim KI, Won HT, Kim LY, Kim MJ. A Mental Health Survey among High School Stusents in Seoul(II). Findings From Mass Survey. Mental Health, Hanyang University, p41-50, 1983.
  8. Oh WS. A study on the correlation between perception of family environment and mental health of boy's high school students. Graduate School of Kyungpook National University, Master's Thesis, 1992.
  9. Lee JK. A Study on realtionship between parental between bring-up manner and mental health of middle school. Graduate School of Education Wosuk University, Master's Thesis, 1996.
  10. Suh SR, Kim JB. Perceived Family Support and Mental Health of Middle school students. J of Korean Soc. of School Health, 15(2):219-232, 2002.
  11. Goldberg D. Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Nfer-Nelson, 1978
  12. Chang SJ. Standardization of collection and measurement of health statistics data. The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine. Seoul, p92-143, 2000.
  13. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. New York, Springer, 1984.
  14. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford University Press, New York, 2nd edition, 1996
  15. Lee JY, Song IS, Jeong YJ, Cho YC. A Study on the Stress and Fatigue Symptoms of High School Students according to the Life Styles. J of Korean Soc. of School Health, 16(1):9-21, 2003.
  16. Lee HJ, Cho YC. Psychosocial Distress and its Related Factors among High School Students in Daejeon City. J of Korean Soc. of School Health, 20(2):91-102. 2007.
  17. Kim DH, Kim HD. Stress-related Socio-demographic Factors and Life Style on Male White Collar Workers. J of Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion, 19(2): 45-55, 2002.
  18. Chang SJ, Koh SB, Kang MG, Cha BS, Park JK, Hyun SJ, Park JH, Kim SA, Kang DM, Chang SS, Lee KJ, Ha EH, Woo JM, Cho JJ, Kim HS, Park JS. Epidemiology of psychosocial distress in Korean employees. Korean J Prev Med, 38(1):25-37, 2005.
  19. Lee YS, Kim KH, Cho YC. Relationships between mental health and psychosocial factors with single-child high school students in an urban city of Korea. Korean J Prev Med Public Health, 39(5):419-426, 2006.
  20. Song IS. Influence of life style to the mental and physical health status of middle and high school students. Doctor's thesis, Graduate School of Chungnam National University, 2002.
  21. Park CW. Life events in School Adolescents with Psychiatric Disorders. J of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 21(4):587-594, 1982.
  22. Kim JS, Lim YM. Relationship among Perceived Stress, Coping Behaviors, and Depression of High School Students. J of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 11(1): 19-32, 2002.
  23. Wie H. A Study on the Factors Affecting the Stress for Adolescents. J of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 14(2):129-138, 2005.
  24. Pratt L. The relationships of socioeconomic status to health. Am J of Pubic Health, 281-291, 1971.