INTRODUCTION
Recent studies of the chemical reactions between transition metal ions and various organic molecules in the gas phase have yielded important insights, not only into the catalytic activity of transition metal ions, but into the reaction mechanisms and the structures of complexes that are present in many important organometallic reactions.1-4 For this purpose, there have been many theoretical studies aiming at explaining reaction mechanisms of the first-row transition-metal ions with simple organic molecules.5-10 Among these studies, the reactions of metal cations with acetone (ACT) have been extensively investigated and reaction pathways appear to be varied depending on the metal ion involved.8-10 Due to the strong binding ability of the early transition metal ions such as Ti+ and Sc+, the reaction of Ti+ with acetone gives the reaction products of TiO+ and CH2CHCH3. Recently it has been shown that density functional theory (DFT) has been used to study the oxidation pathway of acetone with Ti+ and the resulting reaction coordinates describe how Ti+ activates the C=O bond of CH3COCH3 and yields TiO+ and CH2CHCH3 as products.8 This theoretical study can explain experimental findings and give a deeper understanding to the reaction mechanism.8
When H atoms in CH3COCH3 are substituted by highly electronegative F atoms, it is expected that reaction pathways are altered significantly due to the strong binding affinity of Ti+ ion to the F atoms. Therefore the reaction of Ti+ with CF3COCH3 (1,1,1-trifluoroacetone, TFA) provides a good model system to examine the influence of fluorine substituents on the chemical reactivity of Ti+ with acetone. Our recent experimental results11 show that both TiF2+ and TiO+ ions can be produced in the reaction of Ti+ and TFA. This finding implies that the fluorine atom substitution can significantly alter the reaction pathways and related energetics in the reaction between Ti+ and TFA. Here we have investigated reaction pathways and relevant potential energy surfaces (PES) of reactions between Ti+ and TFA in the gas phase using the DFT method. Based on calculated results, we propose the most favorable reaction pathway in the reaction between Ti+ and TFA.
CALCULATION METHODS
The molecular geometries and harmonic vibrational frequencies were calculated by using DFT. The PBE0 (Hybrid, 25% of the exact exchange energy) functional12,13 was used for the reaction of Ti+ with TFA. The structures of all the reactants, products, intermediates, and transition states involved in the title reaction were fully optimized at the PBE0/6-311++G(d,p) levels of theory. Considering the possible spin-orbit coupling interactions that allow an intersystem crossing from the quartet to the doublet in the course of Ti+ with TFA, both the doublet and quartet PESs for reaction of Ti+ with TFA were searched.8-10 The calculation details have been described in our previous work.8,10 Once we found the association complexes between Ti+ and TFA, we verified transition state to connect a desired pair of minima by tracing the intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC).14 Frequency calculations were performed at the same level to identify the stationary points and to estimate zero-point energy (ZPE) corrections that are applied to all reported energies. Natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis was also carried out for some important stationary points to gain electron configurations and bonding properties. All DFT calculations were performed using the GAUSSIAN 03 package.15
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Based on our experimental results for ion-molecule reaction between Ti+ and TFA, here we estimated and performed electronic structure calculations for two plausible reaction pathways as followings:
Unlike the Ti+ + ACT reaction, in which only TiO+ ions are generated by insertion of Ti+ ions into the C=O bond of ACT molecules,10 both TiF2+ and TiO+ ions are observed in the reaction of Ti+ and TFA.11 The optimized geometries of the stationary points in both doublet and quartet states for TiO+ and TiF2+ formation reaction pathways are depicted in Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. Figs. 3(A) and 3(B) show the relevant PES along with the TiO+ and TiF2+ formation reaction pathways, respectively. In all cases, the superscript denotes the spin multiplicity. In typical ionmolecule experimental condition,10 it is highly unlikely that the radical form of isomer can be generated. Therefore we described the most stable species as shown below. In this paper, we used the notations of IMn and TSnm for the intermediate n and the transition state between IMn and IMm, respectively. First, the excited state of Ti+(2F) was calculated to lie 15.9 kcal·mol-1 above the ground state of Ti+(4F) at the PBE0/6-311++G(d,p) levels of theory, which was in well agreement with the experimental value. This demonstrates the accuracy of our calculated results.8
To form a stable association complex, initially a Ti+ ion attacks the electron-rich oxygen of the TFA. 2IM1 and 4IM1 complexes are calculated to be more stable by 30.5 kcal/mol (4IM1) and 45.2 kcal/mol (2IM1), respectively, than the isolated reactants. The complex 4IM1 has a nearly linear binding of Ti+-O-C (170.2o), remarkably different from the bent geometry of the Ni+-CH3COCH3 association complex (∠Ni+-O-C=138.8o), which produces Ni+CO+C2H6 fragments.9 Once the association complexes formed, the next step carries the association complex to the fluoridecontaining species IM2 via transition state TS12. As shown in Fig. 1, this process is strictly analogous to the fluorine atom-migration for HMg+-OCHCH2 from Mg+-OCHCH3, in which the transition state has a five-membered structure.16 It could be assumed that intersystem crossing (ISC) takes place between the ground spin state (4F) and the doublet spin state (2F) reaction pathways during process between TS12 and IM2. Similarly, intersystem crossing between the doublet and quartet spin states also has been observed in the gas phase ion-molecule reactions of Ti+ with CH4, CH3OCH3, and CH3CHO.5,7,17 After this intersystem crossing, two alternative pathways can be initiated along the reaction coordinate.
The PES for TiO+ formation pathway is shown in Fig. 3(A). Following the TiO+ formation pathway, the insertion of Ti+ into the C1=O bond of TFA to produce the IM3 via 2TS23 and 4TS23 with a process barrier of 38.3 and 66.0 kcal·mol-1, respectively. The bond distance of C1-O in TFA is substantially elongated in TS23 compared to those in IM2. The reaction barrier between 2IM2 and 2TS23 constituted the largest barrier on the doublet PES of TiO+ formation pathway, suggesting that the Ti+ insertion into C1=O bond is the rate-determining step of this pathway. After IM3, an electrostatic complex (IM4) between TiO+ and CF2CFCH3, the direct precursor of products in this pathway, is produced by the intra-rotation of Ti+-F bond. The structure of IM4 is well characterized by five-membered ring structure. The dissociation of the (CF2CHCH3)-TiO+ bond of IM4 gives rise to TiO+ + CF2CFCH3 and the TiO+ pathway is computed to be exothermic by 38.5 kcal·mol-1 for TiO+(2Δ) +CF2CFCH3 and 46.5 kcal·mol-1 endothermic for producing TiO+(4Δ) + CF2CFCH3.
Another reaction pathway is TiF2+ formation pathway to account for final products of TiF2+ + FCOCHCH2. The PES for this pathway is displayed in Fig. 3(B). Like the TiO+ formation pathway, this pathway also starts from 4IM1, passes through ISC and produces 2IM2. Then, the C1-O-Ti+ scissor vibration in IM2 transfers the second F atom to the metal center to form complex IM5 through 2TS25 or 4TS25. The five-membered doublet transition state 2TS25 (Erel = -82.0 kcal·mol-1) is more stable than 4TS25. It is interesting to note that both 4IM5 and 2IM5 indeed have an almost identical stability (2IM5 is 0.2 kcal·mol-1 stable than 4IM5) as well as same structure whose Ti+-O bond is largely weakened (RCO=1.957-1.960Å): thus effectively isolating the TiF2+ from the association complex. The forward intermediate from IM5 is IM6, which involves a three-membered ring 2TS56 and 4TS56 with a barrier of 17.8 and 50.9 kcal·mol-1, respectively. An interaction takes place between O and both C1 and C2 in the TS56. The energy of 2IM6 is 10.3 kcal·mol-1 lower than that of the entrance channel. The H atom then migrates into C1 from C3 atoms, forming electrostatic complex, IM7 between TiF2+ and FCOCHCH2, the direct precursor of products in the TiF2+ formation pathway (TiF2++ FCOCHCH2). Although the reaction barrier between IM7 (Erel= -155.8 kcal·mol-1) and products represents the deepest barrier along the doublet surface of the TiF2+ formation pathway, this effect can be attributed to the strong stabilization of both the constituent entities (2TiF2+ and FCOCHCH2). Therefore, the actual rate determining step in this pathway exists between IM5 and TS56, which gives the reaction barrier of 17.8 kcal·mol-1. Fragmentation of the (FCOCHCH2)-TiF2+ bond of IM7 gives rise to the products of this pathway and the overall reaction energy of the 4Ti++CF3COCH3 →2TiF2+ + FCOCHCH2 is calculated to be -100.2 kcal·mol-1.
Fig. 1.Optimized geometrical parameters (bond lengths in Å and angles in degrees) for the stationary points found in both doublet and quartet electronic states for TiO+ formation pathway at the PBE0/6-311++G(d,p) level.
Fig. 2.Optimized geometrical parameters (bond lengths in Å and angles in degrees) for the stationary points found in both doublet and quartet electronic states for TiF2+ formation pathway at the PBE0/6-311++G(d,p) level.
Fig. 3.Potential energy diagrams along TiO+ (A) and TiF2+ (B) formation pathways.
In summary, a comparison between the values of the relative energies of the highest TSs for both reaction pathways shows that 2TS23 (-38.3 kcal·mol-1) has a larger value than 2TS56 (-17.8 kcal·mol-1), suggesting that TiF2+ ions are primary reaction products. However, TiF2+ formation pathway is rather complex than TiO+ formation channel in terms of the number of involved reaction steps. Therefore two reaction pathways can be considered as competitive pathways, which is well in agreement with experimental findings. These reaction pathways account for how Ti+ activates CF3COCH3 in the gas phase and subsequently produces the competitive reaction products in detail.
References
- Roithova, J.; Schroder, D. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 1170. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900183p
- Garvey, J. F.; Peifer, W. R.; Coolbaugh, M. T. Acc. Chem. Res. 1991, 24, 48. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar00002a004
- Koo, Y.-M.; Kim, T. K.; Jung, D. W.; Jung, K.-W. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 248, 810.
- Paul, D.; Hong, K.; Kim, T. K.; Jung, K.-W. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2010, 31, 271. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2010.31.02.271
- Wang, Y.-C.; Liu, Z.-Y.; Geng, Z.-Y.; Yang, X.-Y. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 427, 271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2006.06.102
- Zhao, L.; Guo, W.; Zhang, R.; Wu, S.; Lu, X. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2006, 7, 1345. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200500720
- Ding, N.; Zhang, S.; Chen, X. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 459, 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2008.05.021
- Kim, J.; Kim, T. K.; Ihee, H. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 11382.
- Chen, X.; Guo, W.; Zhao, L.; Fu, Q. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 432, 27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2006.10.031
- Koo, Y.-M.; Hong, K.; Kim, T. K.; Jung, K.-W. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2010, 31, 953. https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2010.31.04.953
- Paul, D.; Hong, K.; Jung, K. W.; Kim, T. K. Chem. Phys. Lett. submitted.
- Adamo, C.; Barone, V. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 6158. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.478522
- Ernzerhof, M.; Scuseria, G. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 5029. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.478401
- Gonzalez, C.; Schlegel, H. B. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 5523. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100377a021
- Frisch, M. J., et al. Gaussian, Revision E.01.; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004.
- Liu, H.-C; Wang, C.-S. Guo, W.; Wu, Y.-D.; Yang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3794. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0122546
- Sunderlin, L. S.; Armentrout, P. B. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 1209. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100316a040
Cited by
- BEP-Like Correction of Nonequilibrium Thermodynamic Parameters of the Solvent-Assisted Reactions: The DFT and Ab Initio Study of Hydration, Peroxidation, and Enolization of Acetone and 1,1,1-Trifluoro vol.125, pp.34, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.1c04501