한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구 (Research in Mathematical Education)

  • 제16권2호
  • /
  • Pages.107-123
  • /
  • 2012
  • /
  • 1226-6191(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9943(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

High School Student-Teachers Attempts to Justify Mathematical Propositions Utilizing Spatial Structuring on Shape Transform

  • Rahim, Medhat H. (Mathematics & Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, Lakehead University) ;
  • Siddo, Radcliffe A. (Mathematics & Mathematics Education, Faculty of Education, Lakehead University)
  • 투고 : 2011.10.22
  • 심사 : 2012.06.20
  • 발행 : 2012.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

A group of twenty-nine high school student-teachers were given a set of mathematical propositions focusing on shape-to-shape transformations. Their task was to determine through hands-on manipulation and use of dynamic software that each shape be transformed into an area equivalent rectangular region. This paper reports on a classroom-based research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Battista, M. T. (1994). On Greeno's environmental/model view of conceptual domain: A spatial/geometric perspective. J. Res. Math. Educ. 25(1), 86-94. ME 1995c.01406 https://doi.org/10.2307/749293
  2. Battista, M. T. (1999). Fifth graders' enumeration of cubes in 3D arrays: Conceptual progress in an inquiry-based classroom. J. Res. Math. Educ. 30(4), 417-448. ME 2000a.00410 https://doi.org/10.2307/749708
  3. Battista, M. T., & Clements, D. H. (1996). Student's understanding of three-dimensional rectangular arrays of cubes. J. Res. Math. Educ. 27(3), 258-292. ME 1997a.00114. https://doi.org/10.2307/749365
  4. Eves, H. (1972). A Survey of geometry: Revised Edition. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
  5. Hoffmann, D. (1998). Visual intelligence: How we create what we see? New York: Norton.
  6. Kosslyn, S. (1996). Image and Brain. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
  7. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. ERIC ED495271
  8. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2008). Focus in high school mathematics: Reasoning and sense making. Reston, VA: Author. ERIC ED507511
  9. O'Daffer, P. G. & Clemens, S. R. (1992). Geometry: An Investigative Approach, Second Edition. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  10. Piaget, J. (1962). Comments on Vygotsky's critical remarks concerning the thought and language of the child. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
  11. Rahim, M. H. (1986). Laboratory investigations in geometry: a piece-wise congruence approach. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 17(4), 425-447. ME 1986i.02532 https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739860170405
  12. Rahim, M. H. & Sawada, D. (1986). Revitalizing school geometry through Dissection Motion Operations. Sch. Sci. Math. 8(3), 235-246. ME 1986x.00472 ERIC EJ334993
  13. Rahim, M. H. & Sawada, D. (1990). The duality of qualitative and the quantitative knowing in school geometry. Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 21(2), 303-308. ME 1990l.02060 https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739900210218
  14. Rahim, M. H. & Siddo, R. A. (2010). Students approaches in constructing convincing arguments in geometry using technology: A case study. J. Korea Soc. Math. Educ. Ser. D 14(3), 219-231.
  15. Rahim, M. H. & Siddo, R. A. (2011). High School Student-Teachers Attempts to Justify Mathematical Propositions Utilizing Spatial Structuring on Shape Transform. In: J. Cho, S. Lee & Y. Choe (Eds.), Proceedings of the 47th Korean National Meeting of Mathematics Education held at Kyungsung University, Nam-gu, Busan 608-736, Korea; November 4-5, 2011 (pp. 277-294).
  16. Steffe, L. P. (1988). Modifications of the counting scheme. In: L. P. Steffe, P. Cobb. & E. von Glasersfeld (Eds.), Construction of Arithmetical Meanings and Strategies. New York: Springer-Verlang.
  17. Steffe, L. P.; Cobb, P. & von Glasersfeld E. (Eds.) (1988). Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies. New York: Springer-Verlang.
  18. von Glasersfeld, E. (1974). Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology. In: C. D. Smock & E. von Glasersfeld (Eds.), Epistemology and education (pp. 1-24). Athens, GA: Follow Through Publications. Avaiable from: http://www.vonglasersfeld.com/034
  19. von Glasersfeld, E. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In: P. Watzlawick (Ed.), The invented reality (pp. 17-40). New York: Norton. [Originally published in German: von Glasersfeld, E. (1981). Einfuhrung in den Radikalen Konstruktivismus.P. Watzlawick (Ed.), Die erfundene Wirklichkeit. Munchen: Piper.] Avaiable from: http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/EvG/papers/070.1.pdf
  20. von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. Studies in Mathematics Education Series: 6. Washington, DC: Falmer Press. ERIC ED381352 Avaiable from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED381352.pdf
  21. Wirszup, I. (1976). Breakthroughs in the psychology of learning and teaching geometry. In: J. L. Martin & D. A. Bradbard (Eds.), Space and geometry: Papers from research workshop (pp. 75-97). Athens, GA: University of Georgia, Georgia Center for the Study of Learning and Teaching Mathematics. ERIC ED132033 Avaiable from: http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED132033.pdf