Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pre-hospitalization Advanced Airway Management Using The KING LTS-DTM and the LMA ProSealTM

LTS와 LMA를 이용한 병원 전 전문 기도 관리 연구

  • Received : 2012.11.12
  • Accepted : 2012.12.06
  • Published : 2012.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

It is very critical to promptly maintain airway of cardiac arrest cases or serious traumatic cases. The purpose of this study is to compare intubation rate, successful rate and pre-/post-education self-confidence between laryngeal tube (LTS) and proseal laryngeal mask (PLMA), so that it may contribute to improving the ability of 119 emergency team - a pivotal role in pre-hospitalization process - to carry out advanced airway management. In order to achieve the purpose, total 60 paramedics (Class I) who worked for incumbent 119 emergency team were asked to join a practical experiment and were also divided into two groups (LTS group: 30 people, PLMA group: 30 people). In details, they were all asked to take 3 sessions of practice (5 minutes per session) using dummy model to quantitatively measure the time and success/failure of intubation and the change of their self-confidence. As a result, it was found that there were statistically significant differences in the time of intubation between LTS and PLMA group (p=.000), but there was no significant difference in the rate of successful intubation between these two groups, and self-confidence of two groups tended to significantly increase after experiment (p=.000). Conclusively, if it is necessary to promptly apply intubation to traumatic cases with immobilized cervical vertebral and lingual edema, LTS can be useful as an effective means of intubation. And it is expected that continuing intubation training using LTS will improve the ability of emergency team to perform advanced airway management for traumatic cases.

심정지 또는 중증 외상 환자의 신속한 기도유지는 매우 중요하다. 본 연구의 목적은 후두튜브(LTS)와 후두마스크(PLMA)의 삽관 속도, 성공률, 교육 전 후 자신감 변화를 비교하여 병원 전 단계의 주축을 담당하고 있는 119구급대의 전문기도관리 능력을 향상 시키는데 있다. 연구 대상자는 119구급대원 중 1급 응급구조사 60명(LTS군 30명, PLMA군 30명)이며 마네킹을 대상으로 5분간 3회 실습 후 삽관 소요시간과 성공 여부, 자신감 변화를 측정하였다. 연구결과 LTS와 PLMA를 이용한 삽관 시간은 유의한 차이를 보였고(p=.000), 성공률은 유의한 차이가 없으며, 실험 후 자신감은 유의하게 상승하였다(p=.000). 결론적으로 경추가 고정되고 혀 부종이 있는 외상환자에게 신속한 삽관이 필요한 경우 LTS 사용이 효과적이며 교육을 통하여 전문기도관리 능력을 향상시킬 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. C. A. Hagberg, F. E. Agro, T. M. Cook, A. P. Reed, ″New generation supraglottic ventilatory devices. In: Hagberg CA, editor. Benumofs airway management: principle and practice. 2nd ed″, philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier, pp. 502-503, 2007.
  2. Available at: http://www.law.go.kr/. 2012
  3. J. H. Park, ″Recognition and request for medical direction by 119 emergency medical technicians″ Korean J Emerg Med Ser, 15(3), pp. 31-44. 2011.
  4. D. K. Rose, M. M. Cohen, ″The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients.″, Can J Anaesth, 41(5), pp. 372-383, 1994, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03009858
  5. R. K. Stoelting, ″Circulatory changes during direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation: influence of duration of laryngoscopy with or without prior lidocaine″, Anesthesiology, 47(4), pp. 381-384, 1977, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-197710000-00012
  6. Denver Metro Airway Study Group, ″A prospective multicenter evaluation of pre-hospital airway management performance in a large metropolitan region.″, Prehosp Emerg Care, 13(3), pp. 304-310, 2009, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1080/10903120902935280
  7. J. K. Johansen, L. Wik, P. A. Steen, ″Advanced cardiac life support before and after tracheal intubation-direct measurements of quality″, Resuscitation, 68(1), pp. 61-69, 2006, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.05.020
  8. J. Strote, R. Roth, D. C. Cone, H. E. Wang, "Prehospital endotracheal intubation: the controversy continues (Conference proceedings)″, Am J Emerg Med, 27(9), pp. 1142-1147, 2009, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2008.08.011
  9. Y. J. Kang, E. S. Choi, ″The level of awareness and practice in prehospital emergency patient assessment and emergency care of paramedic in fire station″, Korean J Emerg Med Ser, 15(2), pp. 67-84, 2011.
  10. S. J. Eun, H. Kim, K. Y. Jung, K. H. Cho, Y. Kim, ″Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of prehospital Care by 119 Rescue Services″, J Korean Soc Emerg Med, 18(3), pp. :177-189, 2007.
  11. T. J. Lim, Y. Lim, E. H. Liu, ″Evaluation of ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in simulated easy and difficult laryngoscopy″, Anaesthesia, 60(2), pp. 180-183, 2005, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.04038.x
  12. J. L. Benumof, ″Management of the difficult adult airway with special emphasis on awake tracheal intubation″, Anesthesiology, 75(6), pp. 1087-1110, 1991, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199112000-00021
  13. J. L. Benumof, ″Laryngeal mask airway and ASA difficult airway algorithm″, Anesthesiology, 84(3), pp. 686-699, 1996, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199603000-00024
  14. N. Weiler, F. Latorre, B. Eberle, R. Goedecke, W. Heinrichs, ″Respiratory mechanics, gastric insufflation pressure, and air leakage of laryngeal mask airway″, Anesth Analg, 84(5), pp. 1025-1028, 1997, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199705000-00013
  15. T. Asai, A. Kawashima, I. Hidaka, S. Kawachi, ″The laryngeal tube compared with the laryngeal mask: insertion, gas leak pressure and gastric insufflation″, Br J Anaesth, 89(5), pp. 729-732, 2002, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/89.5.729
  16. J. Kurola, H. Harve, T. Kettunen, J. P. Laakso, J. Gorski, H. paakkonen, et al., ″Airway management in cardiac arrest comparison of the laryngeal tube, tracheal intubation and bag-valve mask ventilation in emergency medical training″, Resuscitation, 61(2), pp. 149-153, 2004, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.01.014
  17. Korean Emergency Airway Management Society, ″ Manual of Emergency Airway Management(Walls RM). 2nd ed.″, Seoul:Koonja, pp. 120-131, 2008.
  18. A. D. Laveaga, M. C. Wadman, L. Wirth, M. S. Hallbeck, ″Ergonomics of novices and experts during simulated endotracheal intubation″, Work:A journal of prevention Assessment and Rehabilitaion, 41(1), pp. 4692-4698, 2012.
  19. H. W. Yun. E. Y. Yu, Y. H. Yun, ″Comparison of Educational Effects of Difficult Endotracheal Intubation in the 119 Rescue Service″, International Journal of Contents, 11(1), pp. 254-265, 2011.
  20. S. Hickey, A. E. Cameron, A. J. Asbury, ″ Cardiovascular response to insert of Brain's laryngeal mask″, Anaesthesia, 45(8), pp. 621-626, 1990, Article(CrossRefLink)
  21. Y. L. Kim, H. Y. Lee, G. W. Kim, H. S. Jo, J. H. Jung, ″Comparative Study of prehospital Airway Devices Tested Using a Manikin Model: A Comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic (LMA ClassicTM), Cobra perilaryngeal Airway (Cobra PLATM) and the King Laryngeal Tube King LTTM)″, The Korean Society of Emerg Med, 21(6), pp. 776-782, 2010, Article(CrossRefLink)
  22. Available at: http://www.kuksiwon.or.kr/ (accessed Nov., 15, 2012).
  23. F. Adnet, SW. Borron, JL. Dumas, F. Lapostolle, M. Cupa, C. Lapandry, ″Study of the Sniffing position by magnetic resonance imaging″, Anesthesiology, 94(1), pp. 83-86, 2001, Article(CrossRefLink)
  24. G. L. T. Samsoon, J. R. B. Young, ″Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study″, Anaesthesia, 42(5), pp. 487-490, 1987, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb04039.x
  25. A. Turan, G. Kaya, O. Koyuncu, B. Karamanlioglu, Z. Pamukcu, Comparison of the laryngeal mask(LMA) and laryngeal tube(LT) with the new perilaryngeal airway(CobraPLA) in short surgical procedures. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 23(3), pp. 234-238, 2006, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265021505002243
  26. R. Schalk, C. Byhahn, F. Fausel, A. Egner, D. Oberndorfer, F. Walcher, et al., ″Out-of-hospital airway management by paramedics and emergency physicians using laryngeal tubes″, Resuscitation, 81(3), pp. 323-326, 2010, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.11.007
  27. E. A. Tumpach, M. Lutes, D. Ford, E. B. Lerner. The King LTversus the Combitube : flight crew performance and preference. Prehosp Emerg Care, 13(3) pp. 324-328, 2009, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1080/10903120902935322
  28. K. Tatsuaki, K. Yoshinori, O. Tsuyoshi, M. Tomoko, ″Randomized prospective Study Comparing the Laryngeal Tube Suction II with the proSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway in Anesthetized and paralyzed patients″, Anesthesiology, 109(1), pp. 54-60, 2008, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318178819b

Cited by

  1. Advanced airway management for the prehospital traumatic patient vol.14, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2013.14.5.2360