Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factor Analysis of Core Values of Professionalism in Physical Therapy

물리치료 전문직관의 핵심가치에 대한 요인분석

  • Park, Eun-Young (Dept. of Secondary special Education, College of Education, Jeonju University) ;
  • Kim, Won-Ho (Dept. of Physical Therapy, College of Ulsan) ;
  • Lee, Kwan-Woo (Dept. of Physical Therapy, The Graduate School, Sahmyook University)
  • 박은영 (전주대학교 사범대학 중등특수교육과) ;
  • 김원호 (울산과학대학교 물리치료과) ;
  • 이관우 (삼육대학교 대학원 물리치료학과)
  • Received : 2012.08.28
  • Accepted : 2012.12.06
  • Published : 2012.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify construct validity and reliability of instrument for professionalism in physical therapy using developed by American Physical Therapy Association for 470 physical therapists. The corrected data was analysed using confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency. Model of professionalism was adequate (p<.05) and consisted of 7 factors. Standardized coefficients of construct factor were followed by the integrity (${\beta}$=.93), professional duty (${\beta}$=.92), and compassion/caring (${\beta}$=.86). There were significant difference in professionalism by career(p<.05) but not significant difference by sex(p>.05). Also, the internal consistency for sub-factor of professionalism demonstrated adequate reliability of the measure (Cronbach ${\alpha}$=.80~.96). Because instrument for professionalism in physical therapy have a validity and reliability, it is useful for measuring professionalism in physical therapists.

이 연구는 물리치료사 470명을 대상으로 미국물리치료사협회에서 개발한 물리치료 전문직관을 번안하여 이 측정도구의 구성타당도와 신뢰도를 알아보기 위해 실시되었다. 확인적 요인분석을 통해 구성타당도를 알아보았고, 문항내적합치도를 통해 신뢰도를 분석하였다. 번안된 물리치료 전문직관 측정도구는 모형이 적합한 것으로 나타났고(p<.05), 7개요인(역할유연성, 이타주의, 동정/배려, 우수성, 도덕성, 전문가적 책무, 사회적 책무)으로 확인되었다. 구성요인의 표준화계수는 도덕성(${\beta}$=.93), 전문가적 책무(${\beta}$=.92), 동정/배려(${\beta}$=.86) 순으로 높았다. 성별에 따른 전문직관의 차이는 없었으나(p>.05) 임상경력에 따라서는 유의한 차이가 있었다(p<.05). 또한 전문직관은 문항내적합치도가 매우 높았다(Cronbach ${\alpha}$=.80~.96). 번안된 물리치료 전문직관은 구성타당도와 신뢰도가 있는 것으로 나타났기 때문에, 물리치료 전문직관을 측정하는 도구로 유용할 것으로 여겨진다.

Keywords

References

  1. APTA. "Guide to physical therapist practice: revisions. American Physical Therapy Association", Physical Therapy, Vol.79, pp.623-629, 1999.
  2. National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board, Job Analysis of Physical Therapy, Annual Publications 00B-10b, 2004.
  3. R. Cruess, et al. "The professionalism mini-evaluation exercise: A preliminary investigation. Academic Medicine, Vol.81, pp.S74-S78, 2006, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200610001-00019
  4. A. Anguilar, et al. "Exploring professionalism: The professional values of Australian occupational therapists" Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, Vol.59, pp.209-217, 2012, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2012.00996.x
  5. R. L. Duque, Health promotion and the values of occupational therapy, World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin, 2004.
  6. American Board of Pediatrics, Teaching and Assessing Professionalism: A program director's guide, American Board of Pediatrics Foundation, NC, 2008.
  7. Health Professions Council, Professionalism in Healthcare Professionals, Park House, London, 2011.
  8. L. L Swisher, et al. "Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis using a professional role orientation inventory as an example", Physical Therapy, Vol.84, pp.784-799, 2004.
  9. S. Han, et al. "Factors affecting nursing professionalism", Journal of Korea Academic Society of Nursing Education, Vol.14, pp.73-70, 2008. https://doi.org/10.5977/JKASNE.2008.14.1.073
  10. H. Kang, et al. "Reconstruction of professional identity in clinical nurses", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, Vol.32, pp.470-481, 2002. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2002.32.4.470
  11. D. G. Harkson, et al., "Factors related to job turnover in physical therapy", Physical Therapy, Vol.62, pp.1465-1470, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/62.10.1465
  12. American Physical Therapy Association, Professionalism in Physical Therapy: Core Values. American Physical Therapy Association, Alexandria, VA, 2003.
  13. E. Yeun, et al. "Development of a nursing professional values scale", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, Vol.35, pp.1091-1100, 2005. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2005.35.6.1091
  14. D. E. Beaton, et al. "Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaption of self-report measures", Spine. Vol.25, pp.3186-3191, 2000., Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  15. Y. Choi, et al. " Validity and reliability of the korean version of the London handicap scale", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, Vol.11, pp.5102-5109, 2011, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2011.12.11.5102
  16. L. Choi. Structure Equation Modeling, Seoul, Muyok Publishers, 2006.
  17. G. S. Meyer. "The evolving health care market: Professionalism and value at the envelope's edge", Nutrition, Vol.12, pp.285-286, 1996, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(96)00087-2
  18. M. A. Martimianakis, et al. "Sociological interpretations of professionalism", Medical Education, Vol.43, pp.829-837, 2009, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03408.x
  19. R. M. Watson, "Being before doing: The cultural identity (essence) of occupational therapy", Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, Vol.53, pp.151-158, 2006, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2006.00598.x
  20. J. Shin, et al. "Development of a goal questionnaire for engineering experts", The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.26, pp.353-376, 2012.
  21. J. D. Finch, et al. "The investigation of personality structure: Statistical models", Journal of Research in Personality, Vol.31, pp.439-485, 1997, Article(CrossRefLink) https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.1997.2194
  22. Y. Lee, An Analysis of the Core Elements of Nursing Professionalism Based on Delphi Technique, Korea University, Seoul, Korea, 2011.
  23. Royal College of Physicians, Doctors in Society: Medical Professionalism in a Changing World-report of a Working Party, December, 2005.
  24. R. B. Lopopolo, et al., "Leadership, administration, management, and professionalism (LAMP) in physical therapy: A delphi study. Physical Therapy", Vol.84, pp.137-150, 2004.
  25. Y. Hur, An analysis of the core elements and curriculum evaluation of medical professionalism, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, 2006.
  26. Y. Kwon, et al. "A correlation study on nursing professional values, department satisfaction, sociality, self-esteem among nursing students", Journal of Korean Academy Nursing Administration, Vol.13, pp.285-292, 2007.
  27. J. Shim, et al. "Relationship between empowerment, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment among physical therapists", Physical Therapy Korean, Vol.15, pp.70-79, 2008.
  28. S. Ko, et al. "Nursing professionalism and job satisfaction of nurses", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, Vol.10, pp.335-346, 2004.
  29. E. G. Campbell et al. "Professionalism in medicine: results of a national survey of physicians", Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 147, pp. 795-802, 2007. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-11-200712040-00012
  30. J. C. Nunnally, et al, Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.