Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (한국농림기상학회지)

Korean Society of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (한국농림기상학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Climatic Factors Affecting Bud Flush Timing of Pinus densiflora Provenances

소나무 산지의 개엽시기에 영향을 미치는 기후인자

  • Kim, In Sik (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Ryu, Keun Ok (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Joo Whan (Department of Forest Genetic Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute)
  • 김인식 (국립산림과학원 산림유전자원부) ;
  • 유근옥 (국립산림과학원 산림유전자원부) ;
  • 이주환 (국립산림과학원 산림유전자원부)
  • Received : 2012.08.24
  • Accepted : 2012.11.28
  • Published : 2012.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the climatic factors affecting bud phenology of Pinus densiflora provenances. Data were collected from Jungseon, Chungju and Jeju plantations which were parts of the 11 provenance trials established by Korea Forest Research Institute in 1996. The 36 provenances were included in this trial ($33^{\circ}30^{\prime}{\sim}38^{\circ}08^{\prime}$ in latitude and $126^{\circ}30^{\prime}{\sim}129^{\circ}20^{\prime}$ in longitude). The bud swelling date and bud burst date of the provenances were investigated from March to May in 2004 in two-day interval. The four geographic factors and fifteen climatic factors of the test sites and provenances were considered in this study. Canonical correlation analysis was conducted to examine the major factors affecting the bud phenology. Our results suggested that the major factors affecting the timing of bud swelling and burst are the differences in latitude, longitude, extremely low temperature (during December-February), extremely high temperature (during November-February) and annual mean growing days between test plantation and provenance. The provenances with lower winter temperature than that of plantation showed the faster bud swelling and bud burst. Based on these results, the implication on the seed transfer of P. densiflora was discussed.

본 연구는 소나무 산지의 개엽시기에 영향을 미치는 기후인자를 구명하기 위해 수행되었는데 1996년 국립산림과학원에서 조성한 정선, 충주, 제주의 소나무 산지시험림에서 조사가 이루어졌다. 휴면 중이던 동아가 부풀어 오르는 시점을 생장개시기로, 신초가 포린을 뚫고 나와 0.5mm 정도 자란 시점을 개엽시기로 정해 2004년 3월말부터 5월 중순까지 2일 간격으로 조사를했다. 개엽시기에 대한 산지 기후인자의 영향을 구명하기 위해 조림지와 산지의 기후인자를 구했으며, 각 기후인자의 생태적거리를 구해 공준상관 분석을 실시했다. 조림지별 생장개시기와 개엽시기는 제주, 충주, 정선 조림지 순으로 빨라 조림지의 평균 기온 차이에 따른 구배를 보여주었다. 종자산지의 기후인자 차이가 조림지에서의 생장개시기 및 개엽시기에 미치는 영향을 구명하기 위해 생태적거리 자료를 이용하여 공준상관 분석을 실시한 결과, 조림지와 산지 간 위도, 경도, 12~2월 최저기온, 11~2월 최고기온 그리고 생육기간 차이가 주요 인자인 것으로 추정되었다. 결론적으로 조림지보다 겨울철 기온이 낮은 곳에서 온 산지가 생장개시 및 개엽시기가 빠른 전형적인 북-남 또는 저온-고온 경사변이를 나타내 소나무 산지에 따른 지리적 유전적 변이가 존재하는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aitken, S. N., and W. T. Adams, 1997: Spring cold hardiness under strong genetic control in Oregon populations of Pseudostuga menziessi var. menziessi. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27, 1773-1780. https://doi.org/10.1139/x97-151
  2. Bailey, J. D., and C. A. Harrington, 2006: Temperature regulation of bud-burst phenology within and among years in a young Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) plantation in western Washington, USA. Tree Physiology 26, 421-430. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/26.4.421
  3. Beuker, E., 1994: Adaptation to climatic changes of the timing of bud burst in populations of Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea abies(L.) Karst. Tree Physiology 14, 961-970. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/14.7-8-9.961
  4. Blum, B. M., 1988: Variation in the phenology of bud flushing in white and red spruce. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 18, 315-319. https://doi.org/10.1139/x88-048
  5. Burr, K. E., R. W. Tinus, S. J. Wallner, and R. M. King, 1989: Relationships among cold hardiness, root growth potential and bud dormancy in three conifers. Tree Physiology 5, 291-306. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/5.3.291
  6. Cannell, M. G. R., S. Thompson, and R. Lines, 1976: An analysis of inherent differences in shoot growth within some north temperate conifers. In: Tree Physiology and Yield Improvement. Cannell, M. G. R. and F. T. Last (eds). Academic Press, New York, 173-205.
  7. Chmura, D. J., and R. Rozkowski, 2002: Variability of beech provenances in spring and autumn phenology. Silvae Genetica 51, 123-127.
  8. Chuine, I., S. N. Aitken, and C. C. Ying, 2001: Temperature thresholds of shoot elongation in provenances of Pinus contorta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31, 1444-1455. https://doi.org/10.1139/x01-072
  9. Csaba, M., 1995: Modeling effects of climate change with provenance test data by applying ecological distances. In: Proceedings of IUFRO XX World Congress "Caring for the forest: Research in a changing world". 1995. August 6-12. Tampere, Finland, 145pp.
  10. Ekberg, I., I. Dormling, G. Eriksson, and D. Wettstein, 1976: Inheritance of photoperiodic response forest trees. In: Tree Physiology and Yield Improvement. Cannell, M. G. R. and F. T. Last (eds). Academic Press, New York, 207-221pp.
  11. Ekberg, I., G. Eriksson, and C. Nilsson, 1991: Consistency of phenology and growth of intra- and interprovenance families of Picea abies. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 6, 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827589109382671
  12. Frewen, B. E., T. H. H. Chen, G. T. Howe, J. Davis, A. Rohde, W. Boerjan, and H. D. Bradshaw, 2000: Quantitative trait loci and candidate gene mapping of bud set and bud flush in populus. Genetics 154, 837-845.
  13. Hannerz, M., 1999: Evaluation of temperature models for predicting bud burst in Norway spruce. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29, 9-19. https://doi.org/10.1139/x98-175
  14. Harrington, C. A., P. J. Gould, and J. B. St.Clair, 2010: Modeling the effects of winter environment on dormancy release of Douglas-fir. Forest Ecology and Management 259, 798-808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.06.018
  15. Kim, I. S., K. O. Ryu, J. H. Song, and T. S. Kim, 2005: Geographic variation in survival rate and height growth of Pinus densiflora S. et Z. in Korea. Journal of Korean Forest Society 94, 78-81.
  16. Kim, I. S., H. Y. Kwon, K. O. Ryu, and W. Y. Choi, 2008: Provenance by site interaction of Pinus densiflora in Korea. Silvae Genetica 57, 131-139.
  17. Kim, J. H., I. S. Jung, W. H. Lee, and S. C. Hong, 2002: Studies on the fundamental properties of the wood of Gumgangsong (Pinus densiflora for. erecta Uyeki) (Part2). Journal of Korean Forest Society 91, 241-246. (in Korean with English abstract)
  18. Kim, Y. Y., J. O. Hyun, K. N. Hong, T. B. Choi, and K. S. Kim, 1995: Genetic variations of natural populations of Pinus densiflora in Korea based on RAPD marker analysis. Korean Journal of Breeding 27, 23-48. (in Korean with English abstract)
  19. Kong, W. S., 2006: Biogeography of native Korean pinaceae. Korean Geographical Society 41, 73-93. (in Korean with English abstract)
  20. Korea Forest Research Institute, 1999: Pine, Pine Forest. 205pp.
  21. Kuser, J. E., and K. K. Ching, 1980: Provenance variation in phenology and cold hardiness of western hemlock seedlings. Forest Science 26, 463-470.
  22. Leinonen, O. and H. Hanninen, 2002: Adaptation of the timing bud burst of Norway spruce to temperate and boreal climates. Silva Fennica 36, 695-701.
  23. Noh, E. R., 1988: Evaluation of optimum growth and site conditions for major tree species of Korea using climatic factors. Research Report of Institute of Forest Genetics, Korea 24, 138-191.
  24. Rehfeldt, G. E., 1995: Genetic variation, climatic models, and the ecological genetics for Larix occidentalis. Forest Ecology and Management 78, 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(95)03602-4
  25. Rehfeldt, G. E., N. M. Tchebakova, and L. K. Barnhardt, 1999: Efficacy of climate transfer functions : introduction of Eurasian populations of Larix into Alberta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 29, 1660-1668. https://doi.org/10.1139/x99-143
  26. Savolainen, O., F. Bokman, R. Garcia-Gil, P. Komulainen, and T. Repo, 2004: Genetic variation in cessation of growth and frost hardiness and consequences for adaptation of Pinus sylvestris to climate changes. Forest Ecology and Management 197, 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.006
  27. Skroppa, T., and S. Magnussen, 1993: Provenance variation in shoot growth components of norway spruce. Silvae Genetica 42, 111-120.
  28. Yim, K. B., and Z. S. Kim, 1975: The variation of natural population of Pinus densiflora S. et Z. in Korea(I) - Characteristics of needle and wood of Chuwang-san, An-Myeon-do and Odae-san populations. Journal of Korean Forest Society 28, 1-20. (in Korean with English abstract)
  29. Wright, J. W., 1976: Introduction to Forest Genetics. Academic Press, Inc. London, 463pp.

Cited by

  1. Correlation between above-ground and below-ground biomass of 13-year-oldPinus densifloraS. et Z. planted in a post-fire area in Samcheok vol.12, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2015.1107627
  2. A Study on Ecological Niche of Pinus densiflora Forests according to the Environmental Factors vol.15, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2013.15.3.153
  3. Geographical Variation in Bud-burst Timing of Zelkova serrata Provenances vol.15, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2013.15.3.191
  4. Warming results in advanced spring phenology, delayed leaf fall, and developed abnormal shoots in Pinus densiflora seedlings vol.32, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-018-1709-9