Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles (한국의류학회지)

The Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles (한국의류학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Pursued Benefits on Repurchase Intention when Consumers are Satisfied/Dissatisfied with Fashion Product Purchase -The Moderating Effect of Consumers' Hyperopic Disposition-

구매 후 만족·불만족 상황에서 패션제품의 추구편익이 재구매 의도에 미치는 영향 -소비자의 원시안적 특성의 조절효과를 중심으로-

  • Received : 2012.03.06
  • Accepted : 2012.09.19
  • Published : 2012.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study examines the effects of pursued benefits and satisfaction (or dissatisfaction) on repurchase intentions. The research was comprised of a 2 (satisfaction after purchase: satisfaction versus dissatisfaction) ${\times}2$ (product benefit type: utilitarian benefit versus hedonic benefit) ${\times}2$ (hyperopic disposition: high versus low) model, designed with three mixed elements. The subject participants of this study were 168 female university students aged 20 to 29 from the Seoul, Gyeong-gi do, and Chung-cheong do areas. We performed a reliability analysis, T-test, and ANOVA using the SPSS statistic package. The results of this study are summarized as follows. In terms of product benefit that influences repurchase intention based on whether a consumer has experienced satisfaction after purchasing a fashion product, repurchase intention was high for hedonic benefits regardless of the level of satisfaction or dissatisfaction after a purchase. However, we found a significant difference in preference when the hyperopic disposition of a consumer was taken into account. When dissatisfied with a purchase, consumers with low levels of hyperopic disposition displayed higher repurchase intentions for the products of hedonic benefit than those of utilitarian benefits. However, when dissatisfied with a purchase, consumers with high levels of hyperopic disposition displayed low levels of repurchase intention regardless of the type of product benefit. When consumers are satisfied with a purchase, they are more likely to repurchase hedonic products than utilitarian products.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, K. H., & Im, M. W. (2008). The effect of product benefit on brand attachment and brand commitment: The moderating effect of product type and self-monitoring. Journal of Consumer Studies, 19(1), 169-189.
  2. Ahn, K. H., Lim, B. H., & Jung, S. T. (2008). The study of the effect of shopping value on customer satisfaction, and actual purchase behavior. Korean Journal of Marketing, 10(2), 99-123.
  3. Ahn, K. H., & Youn, M. S. (1990). Moderating roles of involvement in attribution process of consumer satisfaction / dissatisfaction. Journal of Consumer Studies, 1(2), 43-58.
  4. Anderson, E. W., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993). The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms. Marketing Science, 12(2), 125-143. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.12.2.125
  5. Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252310
  6. Bolton, R. N. (1998). A dynamic model of the customer's relationship with a continuous service provider: The role of satisfaction. Marketing Science, 17(1), 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.17.1.45
  7. Bolton, R. N., & Lemon, K. N. (1999). A dynamic model of customers' usage of services: Usage as an antecedent and consequence of satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152091
  8. Bowman, D., & Narayandas, D. (2004). Linking customer management effort to customer profitability in business markets. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(4), 433-447. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.41.4.433.47011
  9. Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. (2008). Delight by design: The role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits. Journal of Marketing, 72(3), 48-63. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.3.48
  10. Choi, S. H. (1993). The effect of emotional response to clothing products on attitude formation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.
  11. Choi. Y. J. (2006). The effect of utilitarian/hedonic consequence and value on consumer satisfaction: The moderating role of cognitive/affective involvement. Unpublished master's thesis, Hongik University, Seoul.
  12. Chu, W. J., & Roh, M. J. (2009). The effect of number, distribution, and skewness of peer reviews on hedonic and utilitarian consumption. Journal of Korean Marketing Association, 24(1), 109-143.
  13. Crowley, A. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Hughes, K. R. (1992). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of attitudes toward product categories. Marketing Letters, 3(3), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994132
  14. Ha, Y. W., Ahn, S. W., & Lee, Y. (2002). Consumer choice among alternatives with hedonic and utilitarian attributes/ the impact of choice range and mode. Journal of Consumer Studies, 13(1), 139-157.
  15. Haws, K. L., & Poynor, C. (2008). Seize the day! Encouraging indulgence for the hyperopic consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), 680-691. https://doi.org/10.1086/592129
  16. Holbrook, M. B., & Hirschman, E. C. (1982). The experiential aspects of consumption: consumer fantasies, feelings, and fun. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.1086/208906
  17. Houston, C. (2009). The long-term benefits of a little luxury. Mays Business Online. Retrieved May 13, 2009, from http://maysbusiness.tamu.edu/index.php/the-long-term-benefitsof-a-little-luxury/
  18. Jo, E. Y. (2000). An analysis on the appropriateness factors and the purchase intention of internet shopping for fashion goods based on goods classification of the FCB GRID model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chung-Ang University, Seoul.
  19. Kang, E. M., & Park, E. J. (2009). Effects of cognitive age on perceived service quality, satisfaction, and repurchase intentions across the elderly's lifestyle types in apparel stores. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 33(3), 355-365. https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2009.33.3.355
  20. Kang, J. H., Hwang, S. J., & Yeo, J. S. (2012). The effects of construal level and hyperopia on rewards preferences. Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 13(1), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.21074/kjlcap.2012.13.1.63
  21. Kim, J. Y., & Park, J. O. (2002). A study on the post-purchase satisfaction of clothing related to shopping value. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 26(3), 548-559.
  22. Kivetz, R., & Simonson, I. (2002). Self-control for the righteous: Toward a theory of precommitment to indulgence. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 199-217. https://doi.org/10.1086/341571
  23. Kivetz, R., & Keinan, A. (2006). Repenting hyperopia: An analysis of self-control regrets. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 273-282. https://doi.org/10.1086/506308
  24. Lee, M. H., & Ha, Y. W. (2010). The moderating role of need for cognitive closure and temporal self-construal in consumer satisfaction and repurchase consistency. Korean Journal of Marketing, 11(4), 95-119.
  25. Lee, M. H., & Lee, E. S. (2003). A study on shopping orientation and post-purchase of cosmetics. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 27(2), 250-260.
  26. Mittal, B. (1989). Must consumer involvement always imply more information search? Advanced in Consumer Research, 16, 167-172.
  27. Mittal, V., & Kamakura, W. A. (2001). Satisfaction, repurchase intent, and repurchase behavior: Investigating the moderating effect of customer characteristics. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(1), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.1.131.18832
  28. Mowen, J. C. (2000). Consumer behavior: A framework. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  29. Seiders, K., Voss, G. B., Grewal, D., & Godfrey, A. L. (2005). Do satisfied customers buy more? Examining moderating influences in a retailing context. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 26-43. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.26
  30. Thompson, D. V., & Hamilton, R. W. (2006). The effect of information processing mode on consumer's responses to comparative advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4) 530-540. https://doi.org/10.1086/500483
  31. Tierney, J. (2009). Oversaving, a burden for our times. The New York Times. Retrieved March 23, 2009, from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/24/science/24tier.html
  32. Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R., & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310-320. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.3.310.19238
  33. Yi, Y. J. (2000). A theoretical examination of customer satisfaction research: Findings and outlook. Journal of Consumer Studies, 11(2), 139-166.
  34. Yi, Y. J., & Lee, C. L. (2006). The effects of customer satisfaction on firm's profitability and value. Journal of Marketing, 21(2), 85-113.