DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Inhibitory Effects of Ginger and Processed (Beopje) Ginger Extracts on HCl-ethanol Induced Gastritis in Rats

염산-에탄올에 의해 유발된 흰쥐 위염에 대한 생강 및 법제생강 추출물의 억제작용

  • Received : 2012.06.05
  • Accepted : 2012.10.09
  • Published : 2012.11.30

Abstract

This study examined the protective effects of ginger and processed (Beopje) ginger extracts on gastritis induced by HCl-ethanol in SD-rats. Beopje (or Poje) is a branch of herbal medicines processed using a Korean traditional method to achieve specific pharmacological effects. Gastric lesions were induced in the rats by a treatment of 1 mL of HCl-ethanol (60% ethanol+150 mM HCl). The rats were divided into seven groups: Normal (1 mL of saline without HCl-ethanol treated group), Control (HCl-ethanol treated group), GL (35 mg/kg of ginger treated group), BGL (35 mg/kg of Beopje ginger treated group), GH (350 mg/kg of ginger treated group), BGH (350 mg/kg of Beopje ginger treated group) and Cimetidine (80 mg/kg of cimetidine treated group). The gastric injury inhibition rate was 40.2% and 64.9% in GL and BGL and 68.4% and 99.6% in GH and BGH respectively, showing significantly lower rates than the control (p<0.05). The level of gastric juice secretion decreased significantly in all ginger administered groups. The pH of the gastric juices of BGH increased and the acidity of BGH and cimetidine decreased significantly (p<0.05) compared to the other groups. Beopje ginger had stronger inhibitory effects on gastritis than ginger without the Beopje process. The protective effect on gastritis by the ginger and Beopje ginger extracts increased in a dose-dependent manner (p<0.05). These results suggest that ginger has inhibitory effects on HCl-ethanol induced gastritis in rats that can be improved through the Beopje process.

본 연구에서는 한의학 이론에 근거한 법제(포제)의 가공처리과정을 거친 생강과 일반생강의 위손상 억제효과를 알아보고자 하였다. Sprague-Dawley계 수컷 흰쥐에 HCl-ethanol로 급성위염을 유도하고, 이에 대한 위손상 억제효과를 검토하였다. 생강과 법제생강을 70% ethanol로 열수 추출 및 농축하여 실험에 사용하였고, 생강과 법제생강 투여군 모두 유의적인 위손상 억제효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다(p<0.05). 생강 저농도와 법제생강 저농도의 위손상 억제율은 40.2%, 64.9%, 생강 고농도와 법제생강 고농도의 위손상 억제율은 68.4%, 99.6%로 법제생강 투여군이 생강 투여군보다 위손상 억제효과가 증가되었다. 특히 법제생강 고농도의 위손상 억제율은 대조약물인 cimetidine의 74.9%보다 높은 99.6%를 나타내었다. 위액분비량은 생강과 법제생강을 투여한 군 모두 유의적으로 감소하였고, 법제생강 투여군의 위액분비량(0.32 mL, 2.69 mL)이 생강 투여군(2.66 mL, 3.23 mL)보다 유의적으로 감소되었다(p<0.05). 위액 pH는 법제생강 고농도가 유의성 있게 증가하였고, 유리산도는 cimetidine과 법제생강 고농도에서 유의성 있게 감소되었다(p<0.05). 생강과 법제생강의 투여 용량의 증가에 따라 위손상 억제효과가 증가하였으며, 특히 법제생강고농도는 대조약물인 cimetidine보다도 높은 위손상 억제효과를 나타내었다. 이상의 결과로 생강은 위손상 억제효과가 있음을 확인하였고, 법제의 가공과정에 의해 생강의 위손상 억제효과가 더 증가되었음을 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee KW. 2005. Antibacterial activity of the zingiberaceae plant extract against oral microorganisms. MS thesis. Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  2. Lee BS, Ko MS, Kim HJ, Kwak IS, Kim DH, Chung BW. 2006. Separation of 6- gingerol from ginger (Zinger officinale Roscoe) and antioxidative acidity. Korean J Biotechnol Bioeng 21: 484-488.
  3. Sung KJ. 2010. A study on the pharmaceutical characteristics and analysis of natural ginger extract. J Korean Oil Chemists' Soc 27: 266-272.
  4. Yang WK, Jung CS, Jung KW, Kim JW, Lee EB. 1992. Antigastric and antiulcerative action of the extract of Zingiberis Rhizoma. Yakhak Hoeji 36: 173-179.
  5. Huang CN, Hong JS, Yin MC. 2004. Antioxidative and antiglycative effects of six organosulfur compounds in lowdensity lipoprotein and plasma. J Agric Food Chem 52: 3674-3678. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0307292
  6. Young HY, Luo YL, Cheng HY, Hsieh WC, Liao JC, Peng WH. 2005. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities of [6]-gingerol. J Ethnopharmacol 96: 207-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2004.09.009
  7. Katiyar SK, Agarwal R, Mukhtar H. 1996. Inhibition of tumor promotion in SENCAR mouse skin by ethanol extract of Zingiber officinale rhizome. Cancer Res 56: 1023-1030.
  8. Shanmugam KR, Ramakrishna CH, Mallikarjuna K, Sathyavelu KS. 2010. Protective effect of ginger against alcohol-induced renal damage and antioxidant enzymes in male albino rats. Indian J Exp Biol 48: 143-149.
  9. Kim HC. 2001. Study on the standardization of drug processing in traditional Korean medicine. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Seoul, Korea. p 3-56.
  10. Lee YM, Kim JS. 2003. Studies on the processing of herbal medicines (VI)-HPLC analysis of standard compounds of unprocessed- and processed herbal medicines. Korean J Oriental Medicine 9: 69-72.
  11. Seo BI, Choi HY. 2004. Clinical oriental medicine galenic pharmacy. Younglimsa publishing Co., Seoul, Korea. p 72-99.
  12. Mizui T, Doteuchi M. 1983. Effect of polyamines on acidified ethanol-induced gastric lesions in rats. Jpn J Pharmacol 33: 939-945. https://doi.org/10.1254/jjp.33.939
  13. Kim DB, Sin DG. 2004. Functional testing guide of functional health food. Korea Health Supplement Association, Seoul, Korea. p 554-559.
  14. Ishii Y, Fujii Y, Homma M. 1976. Gastric acid stimulating action of cysteamine in the rat. Eur J Pharmacol 36: 331-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(76)90086-8
  15. Kim CH. 2009. The inhibitory effects of Portulaca oleracea L. on HCl-ethanol induced gastritis in rats. Kor J Herbology 24: 41-47.
  16. Mattsmoto T, Moriguchi R, Yamada H. 1993. Role of polymorphonuclear leucocytes and oxygen-derived free radicals in the formation of gastric lesions induced by HCl/ethanol and a possible mechanism of protection by anti-ulcer polysaccharide. J Pharm Pharmacol 45: 535-539. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1993.tb05594.x
  17. Tsimoyiannis EC, Sarros CJ, Tsimoyiannis JC, Moutesidou K, Akalestos G, Kotoulas OB. 1988. Ranitidine and oxygen derived free radical scavengers in haemorrhagic shock induced gastric lesions. Gut 29: 826-829. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.29.6.826
  18. Amellal M, Bronner C, Briancon F, Haag M, Anton R, Landry Y. 1985. Inhibition of mast cells histamine release by flavonoids and bioflavonoids. Planta Med 51: 16-20. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-969381
  19. Park HJ, Lim SC, Kim DH, Lee JH, Kang HO, Choi J. 2005. Effect of Rosa rugosa extract on the rat with the alcohol- salicylate-induced gastropathy. Kor J Pharmacogn 36: 38-43.
  20. Bang MH, Song JC, Kim SL, Heo HS, Back NI. 2001. Isolation of natural antioxidants from the root of Zingiber officinale R. J Korean Soc Agric Chem Biotechnol 44: 202-205.
  21. Connell DW, Sutherland MD. 1969. A re-examination of gingerol, shogaol, and zingerone the pungent principles of ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Aust J Chem 22: 1033-1043. https://doi.org/10.1071/CH9691033
  22. Tjendraputra E, Tran VH, Lui-Brennan D, Roufogalis BD, Duke CC. 2001. Effect of ginger constituents and synthetic analogues on cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme in intact cells. Bioorg Chem 29: 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1006/bioo.2001.1208
  23. Kim JJ, Ahn SI, Lee JS, Yun SM, Lee MY, Youn HS. 2008. Suppression of the expression of cyclooxygenase-2 induced the toll-like receptor 2, 3 and 4 agonists by 6-shogaol. Korean J Food Sci Technol 40: 332-336.
  24. Cho SY, Lee SH, Choi JY, Shin EM, Kang SS, Jeong SJ, Jeong CS. 2007. Antigastritic effect of carbenoxolone disodium from Glycyrrhizae Radix. J Toxicol Pub Health 23: 165-172.
  25. Hung CR, Lee CH. 1991. Protective effect of cimetidine on tannic acid-induced gastric damage in rats. J Pharm Pharmacol 43: 559-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1991.tb03536.x
  26. Henn RM, Isenberg JI, Maxwell V, Sturdevant RA. 1975. Inhibition of gastric acid secretion by cimetidine in patients with duodenal ulcer. N Engl J Med 293: 391-375.
  27. Pounder RE, Williams JG, Russell RC, Milton-Thompson GJ, Misiewicz JJ. 1976. Inhibition of food-stimulated gastric acid secretion by cimetidine. Gut 17: 161-168. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.17.3.161
  28. Binder HJ, Donaldson RM Jr. 1978. Effects of cimetidine on intrinsic factor and pepsin secretion in man. Gastroenterology 74: 371-375.
  29. Lichtenberger LM. 1982. Importance of food in the regulation of gastrin release and formation. Am J Physiol 243: G429-G441.
  30. Oates PJ, Hakkinen JP. 1988. Studies on the mechanism of ethanol-induced gastric damage in rats. Gastroenterology 94: 10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-5085(88)90604-X
  31. Okebe S, Jino H, Nishida A. 1986. Effects of 15(R)-15-methyl prostaglandin E2 (arbaprostil) on gastric secretion and various gastric lesions induced in rats. Jpn J Pharmacol 40: 329-337. https://doi.org/10.1254/jjp.40.329
  32. Sciffers MJ, Segal HL, Miller LL. 1963. Separation of pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II, and pepsinogen III from human gastric mucosa. Am J Physiol 205: 1106-1111.

Cited by

  1. Inhibitory Effects of Ginger and Beopje Ginger on DSS-induced Colitis in Mice vol.43, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2014.43.4.477
  2. 흰쥐에서 인도메타신으로 유발된 위염에 대한 까마귀쪽나무열매추출물의 보호효과 vol.24, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2017.24.7.1017
  3. Rumex crispus and Cordyceps militaris Mixture Ameliorates Production of Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines Induced by Lipopolysaccharide in C57BL/6 Mice Splenocytes vol.23, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2018.23.4.374
  4. Processed Gingers: Current and Prospective Use in Food, Cosmetic, and Pharmaceutical Industry vol.10, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.2174/2212798410666180806150142
  5. 역류성 식도염에 대한 반하(半夏), 생강(生薑), 소반하탕(小半夏湯)의 효과 비교 vol.40, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.19014
  6. LPS로 유도된 RAW264.7 세포주 염증모델에서 소리쟁이의 법제처리에 따른 항염증 효과 vol.32, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2019.32.5.408
  7. Anti‐inflammatory effects of Beopje curly dock ( Rumex crispus L.) in LPS‐induced RAW 264.7 cells and its active compounds vol.44, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.13291
  8. Rheological Properties of All-Purpose Flour Containing Ginger Powder and the Quality Characteristics of Its Product vol.32, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7856/kjcls.2021.32.1.57