The Journal of the Korean dental association (대한치과의사협회지)

The Korean Dental Association (대한치과의사협회)
권호 표지

Perspectives on minimally invasive restoration

최소침습수복의 전통과 전망

  • Yi, Yang-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
  • 이양진 (분당서울대병원 치과보철과)
  • Received : 2011.02.09
  • Accepted : 2011.02.14
  • Published : 2011.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the filed of Dentistry, minimally invasive treatment modalities are new trend for conservation of natural teeth. Of them, laminate veneer and resin bonded fixed partial denture belong to restoration procedures. In this review, survival rates of each modalities and cause of unserviceability are analyzed, and criteria for success are presented. To get successful results of minimally invasive restoration, plenty of enamel layer, thin and strong materials, and high bonding strength are essential under cyclically loaded wet oral condition. Newly tried design of minimally invasive technique nowadays have to be evaluated only on the basis of requirement for long-term success.

Keywords

References

  1. Christensen GJ. The advantages of minimally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:1563-1565.
  2. Javaheri D. Considerations for planning esthetic treatment with veneers involving no or minimal preparation. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138;331-7. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0165
  3. Goldstein MB.No-prep/minimal-prep: the perils of oversimplification. Dent Today 2007;26(8):10.
  4. Land MF, Hopp CD. Survival rates of all-ceramic systems differ by clinical indication and fabrication method. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2010;10;37-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2009.11.013
  5. Della Bona A, Kelly JR. The clinical success of allceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139(Suppl):8s-13s.
  6. Rochette AL. Attachment of a splint to enamel of lower anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:418-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90163-7
  7. Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 May;87(5):503-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.124094
  8. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009 Jan;28(1):44-56. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.44
  9. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000;28:163-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00066-4
  10. Magne P, Belser U. Bonded porcelain restorations in the anterior dentition. A biomimetic approach. Quintessence;2002.
  11. Paszyna C, Kerschbaum T, Marinello CP, Pfeiffer P. Clinical long-term results with bonded bridges. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1990 Jul;45(7):406-9.
  12. Peumans M, De Munck J, Fieuws S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Van Meerbeek B. A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. J Adhes Dent. 2004 Spring;6(1):65-76.
  13. Magne P, Versluis A, Douglas WH. Effect of luting composite shrinkage and thermal loads on the stress distribution in porcelain laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Mar;81(3):335-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70278-7
  14. Stacey GD. A shear stress analysis of the bonding of porcelain veneers to enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70(5):395-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90073-W
  15. Botelho M. Resin-bonded prostheses: The current state of development. Quintessence Int 1999;30:525- 534.
  16. El-Mowafy O, Rubo MHM. Retention of a posterior resin-bonded fixed partial denture with a modified design: An in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:425-431.
  17. Hansson O, Bergstrom B. A longitudinal study of resin-bonded prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Aug;76(2):132-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90296-6
  18. van Thompson. Resin-retained fixed partial denture. In: Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Mosby;2001.
  19. Dunne SM, Millar BJ. A longitudinal study of the clinical performance of resin bonded bridges and splints. Br Dent J 1993;174:405-411. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808186
  20. Olin PS, Hill EM, Donahue JL. Clinical evaluation of resin-bonded bridges: A retrospective study. Quintessence Int 1991;22:873-877.
  21. Marinello CP, Kerschbaum T, Heinenberg B, Hinz R, Peters S et al. First experiences with resin-bonded bridges and splints- A cross-sectional retrospective study, Part II. J Oral Rehab 1988;15:223-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1988.tb00152.x
  22. Olin PS, Hill EM, Donahue JL. Resin-bonded bridges: University of Minnesota recall data. J Dent Res 1990;69:abstract 2031.
  23. Thayer KE, Williams VD, Diaz-Arnold AM, Boyer DB. Acid-etched, resin bonded cast metal prostheses: A retrospective study of 5- to 15-year-old restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:264-269.
  24. Probster B, Henrich GM. 11-year follow-up study of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:259-268.
  25. Dundar M, Ozcan M, Comlekoglu ME, Gungor MA. A preliminary report on short-term clinical outcomes of three-unit resin-bonded fixed prostheses using two adhesive cements and surface conditioning combinations. Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Jul- Aug;23(4):353-60.
  26. Briggs P, Bishop K. The single unit, single retainer, cantilever resin-bonded bridge. Br Dent J 1996;181:373-379. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4809263
  27. Hussey DL, Linden GJ. The clinical performance of cantilevered resin-bonded bridgework. J Dent 1996;24(4):251-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00073-9
  28. Botelho MG, Leung KC, Ng H, Chan K. A retrospective clinical evaluation of two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Jun;137(6):783-8. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0290
  29. Hansson O. Clinical results with resin-bonded prostheses and an adhesive cement.Quintessence Int. 1994 Feb;25(2):125-32.
  30. Phark JH, Duarte S Jr, Blatz M, Sadan A. An in vitro evaluation of the long-term resin bond to a new densely sintered high-purity zirconium-oxide ceramic surface. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Jan;101(1):29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60286-3
  31. Duarte S Jr, Phark JH, Tada T, Sadan A. Resinbonded fixed partial dentures with a new modified zirconia surface: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Aug;102(2):68-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)00086-9
  32. Yi YJ. The present and future of FRC restorations. Clinical Dentistry 2003;5:68-76.
  33. van Heumen CC, Kreulen CM, Creugers NH. Clinical studies of fiber-reinforced resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: a systematic review. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Feb;117(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00595.x
  34. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Dec;94(6):511-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.010
  35. Blatz MB, Chiche G, Holst S, Sadan A. Influence of surface treatment and simulated aging on bond strengths of luting agents to zirconia. Quintessence Int. 2007 Oct;38(9):745-53.