Korean Journal of Metals and Materials (대한금속재료학회지)

The Korean Institute of Metals and Materials (대한금속재료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of the Pore Size of Graphite on the Mechanical Properties and Permeability of a Porous Nozzle for Continuous Casting Process

  • Cho, Yong-Ho (School of Materials Science & Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Juyoung (School of Materials Science & Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Yoon, Sanghyeon (School of Materials Science & Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Heesoo (School of Materials Science & Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2011.03.02
  • Published : 2011.07.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To analyze the effect of the pore size of graphite in a pore-forming agent, graphite was added to porous ceramics of $Al_2O_3-SiO_2-ZrO_2$ systems. The graphite had 45~75, 100~125, 150~180, and 75~180${\mu}m$ dimensions. The properties of the ceramics, such as apparent porosity, density, dynamic elastic modulus, mechanical strength, and permeability, were investigated. The average pore size increased from 15.35${\mu}m$ to 22.32${\mu}m$ with the increase of the graphite size. The sample with the largest average pore size showed the highest mechanical strength and gas permeability. This was due to the sample with the largest pore size at the same porosity having fewer pores and larger distance between the pores than the sample with the smallest pore size, making cracks less likely to propagate. In addition, the large pore size reduced the repulsive power originating from the drag force between the gas and internal pore walls.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Ministry of Knowledge Economy

References

  1. G. J. Zhang, J.F. Yang, and Tatsuki Ohji, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84, 1395 (2001).
  2. F. Tang, H. Fudouzi, T. Uchikoshi, and Y. Sakka, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 24, 341 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(03)00223-1
  3. K. Maca, P. Dobsak, and A.R. Boccaccini, Ceram. Int. 27, 577 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-8842(01)00004-9
  4. O. Lyckfeldt and J. M. K. Ferreira, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 18, 131 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(97)00101-5
  5. C. Yuan, L. J. Vandeperre, R. J. Stearn, and W. J. Clegg, J. Mater. Sci. 43, 4099 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2238-x
  6. V. A. Mozhzherin, V. Ya. Sakulin, V. P. Migal, A. P. Margishvili, and A. A. Konstantinov, Refract. Ind. Ceram. 49, 4 (2008).
  7. J. K. Brimacombe and K. Sorimachi, Metall. Trans. B. 8B, 489 (1977).
  8. G. M. Evans, G. D. Rigby, T. A. Honeyands, and Q. L. He, Chem. Eng. Sci. 54, 4861 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00206-7
  9. K. Ishizaki, S. komarneni, and M. Nanko, Porous Materials, p. 202-224, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands (1998).
  10. Z. Zivcova, E. Gregorova, and W. Pabst, J. Mater. Sci. 42, 8760 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-1852-y
  11. S. H. Yoon, D. H. Jeong, M. K. Cho, and H. S. Lee, Kor. J. Met. Mater. 48, 625 (2010).
  12. Rice, R. W., J. Mater. Sci. 28, 2187 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367582
  13. Kingery, W.D., Bowen, H. K., and Uhlman, D. R., Introduction to ceramics(2nd ed.), p. 768-815, John Wiley and Sons, New York, (1976).
  14. N. Shinohara, M. okumiya, T. Hotta, K. Nakahira, M. Naito, and K. Uematsu, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 20, 843 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-2219(99)00237-X
  15. E. Gregorova and W. Pabst, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27, 669 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.04.048
  16. J. T. Richardson, Y. Peng, and D. Remue, Appl. Catal. AGen. 204, 19 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00508-1
  17. L. Shen, M. Liu, X. Liy, and BoLi, Mater. Res. Bull. 42, 2048 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2007.02.001
  18. M. C. Shin, J. S. Cha, J. H. Lee, S. H. Lee, and H. S. Lee, Key Eng. Mater. 317-318, 465 (2006). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.317-318.465