Acknowledgement
Supported by : 국립환경과학원
Greenhouse gas(GHG) inventories were reported recently in various fields. It, however, has been rarely to mention about the accuracy and reliability of the GHG inventory results. Some reliable assessment methods were introduced to judge the accuracy of the GHG inventory results. It is, hence, critical to develop an evaluation methodology. This project was designed 1) to develop evaluation methodology for reliability of inventory results by GHG-CAPSS, 2) to check the feasibility of the developed evaluation methodology as a result of applying this methodology to two emission sources: liquid fossil fuel and landfill, and 3) to construct the technical roadmap for future role of GHG-CAPSS. Qualitative and quantitative assessment methodologies were developed to check the reliability and accuracy of the inventory results. Qualitative assessment methodology was designed to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of estimation methods of GHG emissions from emission and sink sources, activity data, emission factor, and quality management schemes of inventory results. On the other hand, quantitative assessment methodology was based on the uncertainty assessment of emission results. According to the results of applying the above evaluation methodologies to two emission sources, those seem to be working properly. However, it is necessary to develop source-specific rating systems because emission and sink sources exhibit source-specific characteristics of GHG emissions and sinks.
최근 인벤토리 구축이 활발해짐에 따라 인벤토리의 정확도 및 신뢰도 평가에 대한 수요 역시 크게 증가하고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 GHG-CAPSS의 신뢰도를 향상시키는데 지표로 활용될 GHG-CAPSS의 신뢰도를 평가하기 위한 방법론을 개발하는데 그 목적을 두고 있다. 본 논문에서는 GHG-CAPSS 신뢰도 평가 방법을 정성적 정량적으로 구분하였으며, 정성적 정량적 평가 결과를 종합하여 신뢰도를 결정할 수 있는 방법을 고안하여 액체 화석 연료 연소에 의한
Supported by : 국립환경과학원