DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Flexural properties of a light-cure and a self-cure denture base materials compared to conventional alternatives

  • Mumcu, Emre (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University) ;
  • Cilingir, Altug (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University) ;
  • Gencel, Burc (Health Service School of Dentistry, Istanbul University) ;
  • Sulun, Tonguc (Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University)
  • Received : 2011.05.06
  • Accepted : 2011.07.01
  • Published : 2011.09.30

Abstract

PURPOSE. A new light curing urethane dimethacrylate and a cold curing resin with simpler and faster laboratory procedures may have even improved flexural properties. This study investigated the 3-point flexural strengths and flexural moduli of two alternate base materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A cold curing resin (Weropress) and a light curing urethane dimethacrylate base material (Eclipse). Along with Eclipse and Weropress, a high impact resin (Lucitone199) and three conventional base materials (QC 20, Meliodent and Paladent 20) were tested. A 3-point bending test was used to determine the flexural strengths and flexural moduli. The mean displacement, maximum load, flexural modulus and flexural strength values and standard deviations for each group were analyzed by means of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (with mean difference significant at the 0.05 level). Post hoc analyses (Scheffe test) were carried out to determine the differences between the groups at a confidence level of 95%. RESULTS. Flexural strength, displacement and force maximum load values of Eclipse were significantly different from other base materials. Displacement values of QC 20 were significantly different from Lucitone 199 and Weropress. CONCLUSION. The flexural properties and simpler processing technique of Eclipse system presents an advantageous alternative to conventional base resins and Weropress offers another simple laboratory technique.

Keywords

References

  1. Phoenix RD. Denture base materials. Dent Clin North Am 1996;40:113-20.
  2. Darbar UR, Huggett R, Harrison A. Denture fracture-a survey. Br Dent J 1994;176:342-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808449
  3. Beyli MS, von Fraunhofer JA. An analysis of causes of fracture of acrylic resin dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:238-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90206-7
  4. Rodford RA, Braden M. Further observations on high impact strength denture-base materials. Biomaterials 1992;13:726-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(92)90135-B
  5. Jagger DC, Jagger RG, Allen SM, Harrison A. An investigation into the transverse and impact strength of "high strength" denture base acrylic resins. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:263-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00830.x
  6. Khan Z, von Fraunhofer JA, Razavi R. The staining characteristics, transverse strength, and microhardness of a visible light-cured denture base material. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:384-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90319-2
  7. Pfeiffer P, Rosenbauer EU. Residual methyl methacrylate monomer, water sorption, and water solubility of hypoallergenic denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:72-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.04.003
  8. Pfeiffer P, Rolleke C, Sherif L. Flexural strength and moduli of hypoallergenic denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:372-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.01.011
  9. Jagger DC, Alshumailin YR, Harrison A, Rees JS. The effect of the addition of poly (methyl methacrylate) fibres on the transverse strength of repaired heat-cured acrylic resin. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:903-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01078.x
  10. Ali IL, Yunus N, Abu-Hassan MI. Hardness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus comparisons of three differently cured denture base systems. J Prosthodont 2008;17:545-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00357.x
  11. Memon MS, Yunus N, Razak AA. Some mechanical properties of a highly cross-linked, microwave-polymerized, injection-molded denture base polymer. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:214-8.
  12. Vallittu PK. The effect of void space and polymerization time on transverse strength of acrylic-glass fibre composite. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:257-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00083.x
  13. Ogle RE, Sorensen SE, Lewis EA. A new visible light-cured resin system applied to removable prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:497-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90397-5
  14. Fellman S. Visible light-cured denture base resin used in making dentures with conventional teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:356-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90350-8
  15. Khan Z, Haeberle CB. One-appointment construction of an immediate transitional complete denture using visible light-cured resin. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:500-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90418-A
  16. Johnston EP, Nicholls JI, Smith DE. Flexure fatigue of 10 commonly used denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:478-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90232-8
  17. Dixon DL, Breeding LC. The transverse strengths of three denture base resins reinforced with polyethylene fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:417-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90261-8
  18. Machado C, Sanchez E, Azer SS, Uribe JM. Comparative study of the transverse strength of three denture base materials. J Dent 2007;35:930-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.09.006
  19. Uzun G, Hersek N. Comparison of the fracture resistance of six denture base acrylic resins. J Biomater Appl 2002;17:19-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328202017001597
  20. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Shaull KL, Laffoon JE, Qian F. Flexural and fatigue strengths of denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:47-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60136-5

Cited by

  1. Influence of Different Repair Acrylic Resin and Thermocycling on the Flexural Strength of Denture Base Resin vol.56, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56020050
  2. Comparison of Mechanical Properties of PMMA Disks for Digitally Designed Dentures vol.13, pp.11, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13111745