족관절 인공 관절 치환술

Total Ankle Replacement

  • 최기원 (연세대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 최우진 (연세대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 이진우 (연세대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실)
  • Choi, Gi-Won (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Woo-Jin (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Woo (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2011.07.20
  • 심사 : 2011.08.16
  • 발행 : 2011.09.15

초록

Although first generation total ankle replacement (TAR) had high failure rates, recent investigations have reported good results of the newer generations of TAR due to advances in implant designs and techniques. Patient selection is critical to performing TAR to obtain promising outcomes and to decrease complication rate. As the current concepts of correcting the accompanying deformity have been established, TAR in moderate to severe varus deformity of the ankle result in favorable outcomes and indications for TAR are expanding. Correction of deformity and hindfoot fusion should be performed in conjunction with TAR if needed. If radiolucency around components or osteolysis is progressive during follow-up, CT should be carried out as a confirmative diagnostic method. TAR is an effective treatment modality alternative to ankle fusion. However, we should recognize that TAR is a demanding procedure, which requires accurate techniques, enough experience, and preoperative plan for a concomitant deformity.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Thomas RH, Daniels TR. Ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:923-36.
  2. Knecht SI, Estin M, Callaghan JJ, et al. The Agility total ankle arthroplasty. Seven to sixteen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:1161-71.
  3. Courville XF, Hecht PJ, Tosteson AN. Is total ankle arthroplasty a cost-effective alternative to ankle fusion? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1721-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1848-4
  4. Hintermann B, Valderrabano V. Total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin. 2003;8:375-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1083-7515(03)00015-9
  5. Pyevich MT, Saltzman CL, Callaghan JJ, Alvine FG. Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelve-year follow- up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1410-20. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199810000-00002
  6. Deorio JK, Easley ME. Total ankle arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:383-413.
  7. Guyer AJ, Richardson G. Current concepts review: total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:256-64. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2008.0256
  8. Wood PL, Deakin S. Total ankle replacement. The results in 200 ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:334-41. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.85B3.13849
  9. Doets HC, Brand R, Nelissen RG. Total ankle arthroplasty in inflammatory joint disease with use of two mobile-bearing designs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1272-84. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00414
  10. Kim BS, Choi WJ, Kim YS, Lee JW. Total ankle replacement in moderate to severe varus deformity of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1183-90.
  11. Hobson SA, Karantana A, Dhar S. Total ankle replacement in patients with significant pre-operative deformity of the hindfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:481-6.
  12. Ahmad J, Raikin SM. Ankle arthrodesis: the simple and the complex. Foot Ankle Clin. 2008;13:381-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2008.04.007
  13. Lord G, Marotte JH. Total ankle prosthesis. Technic and 1st results. Apropos of 12 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1973;59:139-51.
  14. Dini AA, Bassett FH 3rd. Evaluation of the early result of Smith total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;(146):228-30.
  15. Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL. Clinical results of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1658-64. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199611000-00004
  16. Conti SF, Wong YS. Complications of total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(391):105-14.
  17. Gould JS, Alvine FG, Mann RA, Sanders RW, Walling AK. Total ankle replacement: a surgical discussion. Part I. Replacement systems, indications, and contraindications. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2000;29:604-9.
  18. Kim BS, Knupp M, Zwicky L, Lee JW, Hintermann B. Total ankle replacement in association with hindfoot fusion: Outcome and complications. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92: 1540-7.
  19. Stengel D, Bauwens K, Ekkernkamp A, Cramer J. Efficacy of total ankle replacement with meniscal-bearing devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;125:109-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0765-3
  20. Gougoulias N, Khanna A, Maffulli N. How successful are current ankle replacements?: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:199-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0987-3
  21. Hintermann B, Valderrabano V, Dereymaeker G, Dick W. The HINTEGRA ankle: rationale and short-term results of 122 consecutive ankles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(424):57-68.
  22. Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Dick W. Scandinavian total ankle replacement: a 3.7-year average followup of 65 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(424):47-56.
  23. Bonnin M, Judet T, Colombier JA, Buscayret F, Graveleau N, Piriou P. Midterm results of the Salto Total Ankle Prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;(424):6-18.
  24. Kennedy JG, Hodgkins CW, Brodsky A, Bohne WH. Outcomes after standardized screw fixation technique of ankle arthrodesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;447:112-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000203480.04174.0e
  25. Morgan CD, Henke JA, Bailey RW, Kaufer H. Long-term results of tibiotalar arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67: 546-50. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198567040-00007
  26. Saltzman CL, Mann RA, Ahrens JE, et al. Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int. 2009l;30:579-96. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2009.0579
  27. Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1899-905. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01149
  28. Anderson T, Montgomery F, Carlsson A. Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses. Three to eight-year follow-up of fifty- one consecutive ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A: 1321-9.
  29. Hanna RS, Haddad SL, Lazarus ML. Evaluation of periprosthetic lucency after total ankle arthroplasty: helical CT versus conventional radiography. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28: 921-6. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0921
  30. Spirt AA, Assal M, Hansen ST Jr. Complications and failure after total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86-A:1172-8.
  31. Bai LB, Lee KB, Song EK, Yoon TR, Seon JK. Total ankle arthroplasty outcome comparison for post-traumatic and primary osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:1048-56. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2010.1048