한국가금학회지 (Korean Journal of Poultry Science)

  • 제38권3호
  • /
  • Pages.225-230
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1225-6625(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-5387(eISSN)
한국가금학회 (The Korean Society of Poultry Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

동일 조건에서 사육한 토종닭과 일반 육계 도체의 이화학적 특성

Physiochemical Characteristics of the Meat from Korean Native Chicken and Broiler Reared and Slaughtered as the Same Conditions

  • 이경행 (충주대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 정연국 (충남대학교 동물자원생명과학과) ;
  • 정사무엘 (충남대학교 동물자원생명과학과) ;
  • 이준헌 (충남대학교 동물자원생명과학과) ;
  • 허강녕 (국립축산과학원 가금과) ;
  • 조철훈 (충남대학교 동물자원생명과학과)
  • Lee, Kyung-Haeng (Department of Food and Nutrition, Chungju National University) ;
  • Jung, Yeon-Kuk (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jung, Samooel (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Jun-Heon (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Heo, Kang-Nyeong (Depeartment of Poultry, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Jo, Cheo-Run (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2011.08.16
  • 심사 : 2011.09.15
  • 발행 : 2011.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

토종닭과 일반 육계의 차이점을 확인하기 위하여 일반 육계를 토종닭과 동일한 사육 조건에서 사육하고, 2.0 kg 내외의 시기인 13주령에 맞추어 일반 육계도 도계하여 다소비 부위인 가슴육과 다리육을 분리하여 이화학적 차이를 분석하였다. 일반 육계의 가슴육 및 다리육에서 조지방의 함량이 토종닭의 조지방 함량보다 유의적으로 높게 나타났다. pH는 가슴육 및 다리육 모두 토종닭보다 일반 육계에서 유의적으로 높게 나타났으나, 보수력과 명도는 큰 차이가 없었다. 그러나 일반 육계의 가슴육에서 적색도가 높은 것으로 확인되었다. 조직감의 경우에 있어서는 신선 다리육의 씹힘성이 토종닭에서 높게 나타난 것 이외에는 토종닭과 일반 육계간의 차이가 없었다. 그러나 다리육에서 콜라겐 함량은 토종닭의 경우, 6.78 mg/g으로 일반 육계(3.12 mg/g)보다 2배 이상 높은 값을 나타내었다. 결론적으로 토종닭과 동일하게 사육한 13주령의 일반 육계는 토종닭과 비교하여 지방 함량이 너무 많고 콜라겐 함량이 적기 때문에 토종닭과는 유의적인 이화학적 차이를 보였다. 이는 일반 육계를 토종닭과 같은 조건으로 사육한다고 하더라도 육질이 토종닭과 유사해질 수 없음을 의미한다.

Broilers were raised as the same environmental conditions with Korean native chickens (KNC) and slaughtered at the same age (13 week) to observe the physiochemical differences in breast and leg meat. The crude fat content of broilers was significantly higher than that of KNC in both breast and leg meat. pH of both breast and leg meat of broiler was lower than that of KNC. Redness of breast meat surface was higher in broiler than KNC. Except for the chewiness of raw leg meat, which was higher in KNC than broiler, the results of texture showed no difference between broilers and KNC. However, the collagen content of leg meat of KNC (6.78 mg/g) was significantly higher than that of broilers (3.12 mg/g). Results showed that broilers reared and slaughtered as the same conditions with KNC had significantly higher fat content while lower collagen content. Therefore, these physicochemical differences clearly indicate that the meat characteristics of broilers cannot be similar to KNC even if the environmental conditions and slaughter age are identical.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn DH, Park SY 2002 Studies on components related to taste such as free amino acids and nucleotides in Korean native chicken meat. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 31:547-552. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2002.31.4.547
  2. Ahn DH, Park SY, Kwon YJ, Sung SK 1997 Postmortem changes in myofibrillar protein in muscle of Korean native chicken. Korean J Anim Sci 39:577-586.
  3. Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1995 Official Method of Analysis. 16th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
  4. Chen JL, Zhao GP, Zheng MQ, Wen J, Yang N 2008 Estimation of genetic parameters for contents of intramuscular fat and inosine-5'-monophosphate and carcass traits in Chinese Beijing-you chickens. Poultry Sci 87:1098-1104. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00504
  5. Chizzolini R, Zanardi E, Dorigoni V, Ghidini S 1999 Calorific value and cholesterol content of normal and low fat meat and meat products. Trends Food Sci Technol 10:119-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(99)00034-5
  6. Choe JH, Nam KC, Jung S, Kim B, Yun HJ, Jo C 2010 Differences in the quality characteristics between commercial Korean native chickens and broilers. Korean J Food Sci Ani Resour 30:13-19. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.1.13
  7. Ding H, Xu HJ, Chan DKO 1999 Identification of broiler chicken meat using a visible/near-infrared spectroscopic technique. J Sci Food Agric 79:1382-1388. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199908)79:11<1382::AID-JSFA373>3.0.CO;2-U
  8. Huff-Lonergan E, Lonergan SM 2005 Mechanisms of waterholding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci 71:194-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.022
  9. Jaturasitha S 2004 Meat Management. Mingmuang Press, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
  10. Jaturasitha S, Srikanchai T, Kreuzer M, Wicke M 2008 Difference in carcass and meat characteristics between chicken indigenous to northern Thailand (black boned and Thai native) and imported extensive breeds (Bresse and Rhode Island Red). Poultry Sci 87:160-169. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2006-00398
  11. Jeon HJ, Choe JH, Jung Y, Kruk ZA, Lim DG, Jo C 2010 Comparison of the chemical composition, textural characteristics, and sensory properties of North and South Korean native chickens and commercial broilers. Korean J Food Sci Ani Resour 30:171-178. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2010.30.2.171
  12. Kim HK 2010 Breeding control of Woorimotdak (1). Korean Poultry Journal 487:153-155.
  13. Lepetit J 2008 Collagen contribution to meat toughness: Theoretical aspects. Meat Sci 80:960-967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.06.016
  14. Nishimura T, Hattori A, Takahashi K 1999 Structural changes in intramuscular connective tissue during the fattening of Japanese Black cattle: Effect of marbling on beef tenderization. J Anim Sci 77:93-104. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.77193x
  15. Palka K 1999 Changes in intramuscular connective tissue and collagen solubility of bovine M. semitendinosus during retorting. Meat Sci 53:198-194.
  16. Ryoichi S, Degychi T, Nagata Y 1993 Effectiveness of the filter paper press methods for determining the water holding capacity of meat. Fleischwirtsch 73:1399.
  17. Sang BD, Kong HS, Kim HK, Choi CH, Kim SD, Cho YM, Sang BC, Lee JH, Jeon GJ, Lee HK 2006 Estimation of genetic parameters for economic traits in Korean. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 19:319-323. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.319
  18. Swatland HJ 2008 How pH causes paleness or darkness in chicken breast meat. Meat Sci 80:396-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.01.002
  19. Torrescano G, Sanchez-Escalante A, Gimenez B, Roncales R, Beltran JA 2003 Shear values of raw samples of 14 bovine muscles and their relation to muscle collagen characteristics. Meat Sci 64:85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00165-1
  20. Wattanachant S, Benjakul S, Ledward DA 2004 Composition, color, and texture of Thai indigenous and broiler chicken muscles. Poultry Sci 83:123-128. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.1.123
  21. Zerehdaran S, Vereijken ALJ, van Arendonk JAM, van der Waaij EH 2004 Estimation of genetic parameters for fat deposition and carcass traits in broilers. Poultry Sci 83:521-525. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.4.521
  22. 김종갑 2008 e-축산뉴스 http://www.chuksannews.co.kr/news/article.html?no=44643

피인용 문헌

  1. Changes in Fatty Acid Profile of Breast and Thigh Muscle of Old Laying Hens as Transferred from Cage to Backyard Raising System vol.21, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2012.21.6.763
  2. Chemical Compositions of the Four Lines of Korean Native Chickens vol.43, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2016.43.2.119
  3. A Study on Components Related to Flavor and Taste in Commercial Broiler and Korean Native Chicken Meat vol.19, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2012.19.3.385
  4. Comparison of Physicochemical Characteristics of the Meat in Four Lines of Korean Native Chickens vol.42, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2015.42.4.335
  5. Genetic Parameters for Growth-Related Traits in Korean Native Chicken vol.42, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2015.42.4.285
  6. The breeding history and commercial development of the Korean native chicken vol.73, pp.01, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1017/S004393391600088X
  7. Comparison of Quality Traits of Meat from Korean Native Chickens and Broilers Used in Two Different Traditional Korean Cuisines vol.26, pp.7, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12684
  8. Comparison of Cut Meat Yield from Two Different Breeds of Broilers in Korea vol.39, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2012.39.3.163
  9. Comparison of Meat Quality and Sensory Characteristics of Different Native Chickens in Korean Market vol.41, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2014.41.1.53
  10. Productivity and Meat Quality of the New Crossbred Korean Native Chickens Compared with Commercial Breeds vol.45, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2018.45.2.125