Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회지)

Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development on Fuzzy-AHP Ranking Risk Assessment Model for the monitoring systems

관제시스템 구축을 위한 Fuzzy-AHP 위험 순위 평가 모델 개발

  • Received : 2011.02.11
  • Accepted : 2011.06.09
  • Published : 2011.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this study is to develop an evaluation model for the National highway risky areas. Thus, for the purposes of doing this, National highway risky area evaluated targeting to provide determination ranking and suggesting rival-superiority factors as well as under-inferiority factors in ten National highway risky areas. This study developed for modules of risky areas evaluation, using fuzzy set theory and analytic hierarchy process for evaluation model of National highway risky area in transport environment. The preceding studies assess risk analysis through analysis of causal relationships by National highway safety sector not only handles rating scale development suitable for assessment area by referring to accident frequency model but also geometric structures model. As result of this study, this model of Fuzzy Ahp Risk Analysis (FARA) apply for programmable design in real time processing through easily derive strategy for improvement activities to provide a decision-making effectively. Furthermore, this study contributes frame for improvements of National highway construction for renovation's priority strategy as well as future's policy schemes.

Keywords

References

  1. Deacon J. A., Zegeer, C. V., and Deen, R. C., Identification of Hazardous Rural Highway Location, In Transportation Research Record 543, TRB, pp. 16-33. 1975.
  2. Stokes R. W., and Mutbazi M. I., Rate-Quality control Method of Identifying Hazardous Road Locations. In Transportation Research Record 1542, TRB, pp. 44-48. 1996.
  3. Van de Ven, Andrew H., and Ferry, Diane L., Measuring and Assessing Organization, New York Wiley, pp. 352-379. 1980.
  4. 국토해양부, 건설교통 재난/재해대책 편람 및 위기 대응 매뉴얼, pp. 74-102. 2004.
  5. 국토해양부, 2009년도 국도 ITS 기반 인프라(국도 5호선 등) 및 취약지구 관제시스템 구축 설계보고서, 한국건설기술연구원, pp. 315-336. 2009.
  6. 국토해양부, 도로제설 핸드북, pp. 20-50. 2009.
  7. 김응철, 이동민, 최은진, 김도훈, 지방부 교차로의 도로설계 안전성 판단 알고리즘 구축을 위한 AMF 개발 (신호교차로를 중심으로), 대한교통학회지, 제27권 제3호, pp.91-102. 2009.
  8. 성낙문, 교통사고예측모델을 이용한 도로의 안전도 평가방법연구, 정책연구 2003-02, 한국교통연구원, pp.24-58. 2002.
  9. 정성봉, 황보희, 성낙문, 이선하, EB기법을 이용한 사고잦은 곳 개선사업 우선순위 판정기법 개발, 대한교통학회지, 대한교통학회, 제27권 제3호, pp. 81-90. 2009
  10. 오주택, 성낙문, 하오근, 국도변 신호교차로 안전성 향상을 위한 사고예측모형개발, 대한토목학회논문집, 대한토목학회, 제25권 제1D호, pp.9-15. 2005.
  11. Higle J. L, and Witkowski J. M., Bayesian identification of hazardous sites, Transportation Research Record 1185, pp. 24-35. 1988.
  12. 하태준 강정규, 박제진, 신호교차로 교통사고 예측 모형의 개발 및 적용(광주광역시 4지 선호교차로를 중심으로), 대한교통학회지, 대한교통학회, 제19권 제6호, pp. 207-218. 2001.
  13. 김원철, 이수범, 남궁문, Hirofumi Imada, 교차로 안전진단을 위한 교통사고건수예측모델화 수법에 관한 연구, 제21권 제4D호, 대한토목학회논문집, 대한토목학회, pp. 427-435. 2001.
  14. 강민욱, 고속도로 곡선 구간에서의 사고예측 모형 개발, 제22권 제6D호, 대한토목학회논문집, 대한토목학회, pp. 1077-1088. 2002.
  15. 이재명, 김태호, 이용택, 원제무, CART 분석을 이용한 교통사고예측모형의 개발, 한국도로학회논문집, 제10권 제1호 통권35호, pp. 31-39, 한국도로학회, 2008.
  16. Laughland J.C., Haefner L E., Hall, J. W., and Clough, D. R., NCHRP Report 162 : Methods for Evaluating Highway Safety Improvements, TRB. 1975.
  17. Abbess C. Jarrett D. F., Accident at black-spot: estimating the effectiveness of remedial treatment, with special reference to the regression to mean effect, Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol. 22, No. 10, pp. 535-542. 1981.
  18. Persaud B. N., Retting R. A., Garder P. E., and Lord D., Safety Effects fo Roundout conversions in the United States, In Transportation Research Record 1751, TRB, pp. 1-8. 2001.
  19. Haur E. On the estimation of the expected number of accident, Accident Anal. & Prev., Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 1-12. 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(86)90031-X
  20. Haur E. and Persaud B., How to Estimate the Safety of Railhighway Grade Crossings and the Safety Effect of Warning Devices, In Transportation Research Record 1114, TRB, pp.131-140. 1987.
  21. Haur E. Hauer E., Ng JCN, and Lovell J., Estimation of Safety at Signalized Intersection, In Transportation Research Record 1185, TRB, pp. 48-61. 1988.
  22. Hauer E, Obervational before-after studies in road safety, Pergamon, Oxford, U.K. 1997.
  23. Harwood D. W., Council F. M., and Griffith M. S., Estimating Safety by Empirical Bayes Method: A Tutorial, In Transportation Research Record 1784, TRB, pp. 126-131. 2002.
  24. Haur E., Empirical bayes approach to the estimation of "UNSAFETY" : the multivariate regression method, Accident Anal. & Prev., Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 24-36, 1992.
  25. Haur Ezra and Persaud, B., Problem of Identifying Hazardous Locations Using Accident Data, In Transportation Research Record 975, TRB, pp. 36-43. 1984.
  26. Bellman R.E. and Zadeh, L.A., Decision making in a fuzzy environment, Management Science, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 141-164. 1970.
  27. Bentez J.M., Martin J. C., and Roman C., Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry, Tourism Management, Vol.28, pp. 544-555. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.04.018
  28. Zadeh Lotfi A., Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, Vol. 8, pp. 338-353. 1965. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  29. Zadeh Lotfi A., Toward a perception-based theory of probabilistic reasoning with imprecise probabilities, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, Vol. 105, pp. 233-264. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(01)00212-9
  30. Wen Cheng and Simon Washington., Experimental evaluation of hotspot identification methods, Accident Anal. & Prev., Vol. 37, pp. 870-881. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.04.015
  31. Wen Cheng and Simon Washington., New Criteria for Evaluation Hotspot Identification Methods, TRB, 2008, pp. 1-25. 2009.
  32. Saaty Thomas L. and Vargas, Luis G., Model, Methods Concepts and Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 2001.
  33. Persaud B. and Lyon, C., Empirical Bayes before-after safety studies : Lesson learned from two decades of experience and future directions, Accident Anal. & Prev., Vol. 39, No.3, pp. 546-555. 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.09.009
  34. Nunnally Jum C. and Bernstein Ira H., Psychometric Theory, 3ed, pp. 53-79. 1994.
  35. 정성학, 인공지능 기법을 활용한 다 기준 의사결정 지원 시스템 분석 프로그램, 프로그램 등록번호 2010-01-129-002882, 한국저작권위원회, pp. 1-15. 2010.