구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제27권2호
  • /
  • Pages.149-159
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지

고정성 보철물과 연관된 합병증과 실패에 관한 조사

Complication and Failure Analysis of Fixed Restorations

  • 윤미정 (부산대학교 치과대학 보철학 교실)
  • Yun, Mi-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2011.05.01
  • 심사 : 2011.06.25
  • 발행 : 2011.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

고정성 보철물의 장기적 예후를 보장하고자 하는 많은 노력에도 불구하고, 아직도 임상에서는 부적절한 제작 및 유지 관리로 인한 다양한 고정성 보철물의 합병증이 관찰되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 고정성 보철물의 임상적 상태를 조사하여 보철 진료의 임상적 참고 자료와 연구의 기초 자료로 도움이 되고자하였다. 2009년 1월에서 2009년 12월까지 12개월간 부산대학교병원 치과 보철과에 내원한 환자 중 기존의 고정성 보철물을 철거하고 치료를 시행한 환자를 대상으로 고정성 보철물과 지대치에 연관된 임상적 상태를 조사 평가하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 전체 고정성 보철물의 추정 수명은 10.0년이었고, 평균 장착 기간은 $10.3{\pm}5.5$년이었다. 2. 악골에 따른 수명의 차이는 없었으나 (P>.05), 전후방 위치에서는 전치부 또는 구치부에 비해 전치부와 구치부를 포함하는 보철물의 수명이 가장 길었다 (P<.05). 3. 고정성 보철물의 재료별 수명은 금속관이 가장 길었고 (P<.05), 다른 재료들 간에는 유의한 차이가 없었다 (P>.05). 4. 고정성 보철물의 크기는 보철물 수명에 영향을 미치지 않았다 (P>.05). 5. 대합치 조건별 고정성 보철물의 수명은 자연치와 고정성 보철물, 가철성 국소 의치, 총의치 순으로 길었다 (P<.05). 6. 고정성 보철물의 생물학적 합병증은 치주 질환 (37.5%), 치아 우식증 (19.0%), 그리고 치수 질환 (10.8%) 순이었고, 기계적 문제점은 변연 결함 (18.4%), 보철물 파절(4.2%), 유지력 상실 (3.9%), 치아 파절 (3.6%), 그리고 식편 압입 (2.6%) 순이었다. 보철물을 철거한 후 치대치의 33.1%는 재수복이 불가능한 상태였다.

Restoring and replacing teeth with fixed prostheses commonly used in dental practice. Because of improper oral hygiene care and inaccurate laboratory procedure, complication of fixed prostheses was found in the mouth of patient. Although many efforts have been continually made to obtain the data of long term prognosis of fixed prostheses, it was difficult to do it. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical status of fixed prostheses to improve the quality of dental care. In order to assess the clinical status of fixed prostheses, a total of 154 individuals (aged 22-82, 88 women and 66 men loaded with 578 unit of fixed prostheses, and 423 abutments) who visited the Department of Prosthodontics, Pusan National University Hospital, between January 2009 to December 2009 and removed old fixed prostheses were examined. The results of this study were as follows: 1. Length of service of fixed prostheses was $10.3{\pm}05.5$ years (mean), 10.0 years (median). 2. Location of fixed prostheses was found to have statistically significant influence on longevity of fixed prostheses (P<.05). The longevity of fixed prostheses was high in anterior-posterior combination region (mean:13.1, median:13.5) than anterior and posterior region. 3. Longevity of fixed prostheses made of metal was longest (mean:13.3, median:12.3). 4. Number of units in fixed prostheses was found to have no statistically significant influence on longevity of fixed prostheses (P>.05). 5. Condition of opposing dentition was found to have statistically significant influence on longevity of fixed prostheses (P>.05). The fixed prostheses lasted longest when opposed by complete denture (mean:17.1, median:19.7), removable partial denture, fixed prosthesis and natural dentition trailing behind (P<.05) 6. Periodontal disease (37.5%), dental caries (19.0%), defective margin (18.4%) were frequent complications. In 33.1% of the cases, abutment state after removing fixed prostheses was needed to be extracted.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Schwartz NL, Whitsett LD, Berry TG, Stewart JL. Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: life-span and causes for loss of serviceability. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;81:1395-401 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1970.0398
  2. Walton JN, Gardner FM, Agar JR. A survey of crown and fixed partial denture failures: length of service and reasons for replacement. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:416-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90379-3
  3. Valderhaug J. A 15-year clinical evaluation of fixed prosthodontics. Acta Odontol Scand 1991;49:35-40 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359109041138
  4. Palmqvist S, Swartz B. Artificial crowns and fixed partial dentures 18 to 23 years after placement. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:279-85
  5. Karlsson S. A clinical evaluation of fixed bridges, 10 years following insertion. J Oral Rehabil 1986;13: 423-32 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1986.tb01304.x
  6. Glantz P-OJ, Ryge G, Jendresen MD, Nilner K. Quality of extensive fixed prosthodontics after five years. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:475-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90327-5
  7. Glantz P-OJ, Nilner K, Jendresen MD, Sundberg H. Quality of fixed prosthodontics after 15 years. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:247-52 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040574
  8. Glantz P-OJ, Nilner K, Jendresen M, Sundberg H. Quality of fixed prosthodontics after twenty-two years. Acta Odontol Scand 2002;60:213-8 https://doi.org/10.1080/000163502760147972
  9. Moon HY. A study on the life expectation of dental restorations. Korean academy of oral health 1985;9: 51-74
  10. Shin WJ, Jeon YS, Lee KW, Lee HY, Han DH. Longevity and failure analysis of fixed restorations serviced in Korea. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2005;43:158-75
  11. Foster LV. The relationship between failure and design in conventional bridgework from general dental practice. J Oral Rehabil 1991;18:491-5 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1991.tb00070.x
  12. Foster LV. Failed conventional bridge work from general dental practice: clinical aspects and treatment needs of 142 cases. Br Dent J 1990;168:199-201 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4807133
  13. Roberts DH. The relationship between age and the failure rate of bridge prostheses. Br Dent J 1970;17: 175-7
  14. Libby G, Arcuri MR, LaVelle WE, Hebl L. Longevity of fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78: 127-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70115-X
  15. Holm C, Tidehag P, Tillberg A, Molin M. Longevity and quality of FPDs: a retrospective study of restorations 30, 20, and 10 years after insertion. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:283-9
  16. Drake CW, Maryniuk GA, Bentley C. Reasons for restoration replacement: differences in practice patterns. Quintessence Int 1990;21:125-30
  17. Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1973;87:369-77 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1973.0421
  18. Leempoel PJB, Van't Hof MA, De Haan AFJ. Survival studies of dental restorations: criteria, methods and analyses. J Oral Rehabil 1989;16:387-94 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01355.x
  19. Rudd KD, O'Leary TJ, Stumpf AJ. Horizontal tooth mobility in carefully screened subgects. Periodontics 1964;2:65-8
  20. Reuter JE, Brose MO. Failure in full crown retained dental bridges. Br Dent J 1984;157:61-3 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805411
  21. Randow K, Glantz P-OJ, Zoger B. Technical failures and some related clinical complications in extensive fixed prosthodontics. An epidemiological study of long-term clinical quality. Acta Odontol Scand 1986; 44:241-55 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358608997726
  22. Richter WA, Ueno H. Relationship of crown margin placement to gingival inflammation. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:156-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90050-4
  23. Hammerle C. Success and failure of fixed bridgework. Periodontology 2000 1994;4:41-51 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1994.tb00004.x