Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지

Clinical Application of Dynamic Impression Method Using Coe-Comfort$^{(R)}$ in Edentulous Patients

무치악 환자에서 Coe-comfort$^{(R)}$를 이용한 동적 인상 채득의 임상적 활용

  • Keum, Eun-Cheol (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Song, Young-Gyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Lim, Jong-Hwa (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Shin, Soo-Yeon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 금은철 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 송영균 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 임종화 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 신수연 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2010.10.23
  • Accepted : 2011.03.25
  • Published : 2011.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Impression taking procedure is very important for support, retention and stability of denture, and it affects the success of denture in completely edentulous patients. Various materials and methods have been used for impression taking in complete denture, while dynamic impression method is more physiological and functional method than the others. We had satisfying results with fabrication and relining of dentures after taking impression in the most physiological condition with recovery of deformed soft tissue by dynamic impression method using Coe-comfort$^{(R)}$ (GC America, IL, USA), tissue conditioner, in edentulous patients in this case report.

총의치 환자의 치료 시 인상 채득 과정은 의치의 지지, 유지, 그리고 안정을 위해 매우 중요하며, 의치의 성공여부를 좌우한다. 총의치 인상 채득을 위한 여러 가지 재료와 방법들이 이용되어 왔으며, 그 중 조직 양화재 (tissue conditioner)를 이용한 동적 인상법 (dynamic impression method)은 보다 생리적이고 기능적인 방법이다. 본 증례들에서는 무치악 환자에서 조직 양화재인 Coe-comfort$^{(R)}$ (GC America, IL, USA)를 이용한 동적 인상법으로 변형된 연조직의 회복과 하께 가장 생리적인 상태로 인상을 채득하여 의치의 제작 및 첨상을 시행하였으며, 만족스런 결과를 얻었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Chase WW. Tissue conditioning utilizing dynamic adaptive stress. J Prosthet Dent 1961;804-815.
  2. Harrison A. Temporary soft lining materials. A review of their uses. Br Dent J 1981;151:419-422. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4804726
  3. McCarthy JA, Moser JB. Mechanical properties of tissue conditioners. Part I: Theoretical considerations, behavioral characteristics, and tensile properties. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:
  4. McCarthy JA, Moser JB. Mechanical properties of tissue conditioners. Part II: Creep characteristics. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:334-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(78)90043-4
  5. Elsemann RB, Souto AA, Shinkai RSA. Degradation of tissue conditioners in complete dentures: An in situ study. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21:486-488.
  6. Graham BS, Jones DW, Sutow EJ. Clinical implications of resilient denture lining material research. Part II: Gelatation and flow prosperties of tissue conditioners. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:413-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90234-N
  7. Nassif J, Jumbelic R. Current concepts for relining complete dentures: A survey. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:11-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(84)80093-1
  8. Graham BS, Jones DW, Sutow EJ. Clinical implications of resilient denture lining material research. Part I: Flexibility and elasticity. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:421-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90174-1
  9. Graham BS, Jones DW, Thompson JP, Johnson JA. Clinical compliance of two resilient denture liners. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:157-163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1990.tb01405.x
  10. Murata H, Kawamura M, Hamada T et al. Dimensional stability and weight changes of tissue conditioners. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:918-923. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00736.x
  11. Murata H, Hong G, Li YA, Hamada T. Compatibility of tissue conditioners and dental stones: Effect on surface roughness. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:274-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.011