Effects of Days Open on the Subsequent Reproductive Performance Following to CIDR-Based Estrus Synchronization in Lactating Dairy Cows

  • Kang, Hyun-Gu (Laboratory of Theriogenology, Veterinary Medical Center, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Ill-Hwa (Laboratory of Theriogenology, Veterinary Medical Center, Chungbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2011.04.16
  • 심사 : 2011.04.25
  • 발행 : 2011.06.30

초록

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of days open on subsequent reproductive performance following to estrus synchronization in the 114 lactating dairy cows. The animals were divided into two groups according to the time of estrus synchronization; viz, ${\leq}$ 85 days, and > 85 days postpartum, respectively. The estrus synchronization protocol consisted of insertion of a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) device containing 1.9 g progesterone with an injection of 250 ${\mu}g$ gonadorelin (Day 0), an injection of $PGF_2{\alpha}$ and removal of the device on Day 7, an injection of 250 ${\mu}g$ GnRH on Day 9, and TAI 17 h later. Pregnancy diagnosis was determined at 30 to 60 days after TAI using both ultrasonography and rectal palpation. The body condition score (BCS) gradually increased over the postpartum period. In estrus synchronized cows until 85 days, conception rate on first service, number of service per conception, interval from estrus synchronization to conception, and interval from calving to conception were not significantly different among two farms (P>0.05). In estrus synchronized cows after 85 days postpartum, conception rate on first service, number of service per conception and interval from calving to conception were significantly different ($P{\leq}0.05$) between herds A and B (26.8 vs 50.0%; $2.1{\pm}1.35$ vs $1.37{\pm}0.54$ times, $237.3{\pm}97.8$ vs $164.7{\pm}69.3$ days, respectively). In estrus synchronized cows after 85 days postpartum interval from estrus synchronization to conception was greater (P<0.01) in herd B than in herd A ($63.6{\pm}57.4$ vs $26.1{\pm}24.9$). These results indicate that the time of estrus synchronization for maximized the reproductive performance is before 85 days postpartum and feeding and management is important factor for high reproductive performance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alnimer MA and Lubbadeh WF. 2008. Effect of progesterone (P(4)) intravaginal device (CIDR) to reduce embryonic loss and to synchronize return to oestrus of previously timed inseminated lactating dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 107:36-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.06.018
  2. Alnimer MA, Tabbaa MJ, Ababneh MM and Lubbadeh WF. 2009. Applying variations of the ovsynch protocol at the middle of the estrus cycle on reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows during summer and winter. Theriogenology 72:731-740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.05.006
  3. Ansari-Lari M and Abbasi S. 2008. Study of reproductive performance and related factors in four dairy herds in Far province (southern Iran) by Cox proportional-hazard model. Prev. Vet. Med. 85:158-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.02.004
  4. Asimwe L and Kifaro GC. 2007. Effect of breed, season, year and parity on reproductive performance of dairy cattle under small holder production system in Bukoba district, Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19(10):1-9.
  5. Beam SW and Butler WR. 1999. Effects of energy balance on follicular development and first ovulation in postpartum dairy cows. J. Reprod. Fertil. (Suppl.) 54:411-424.
  6. Brusveen DJ, Cunha AP, Silva CD, Cunha PM, Sterry RA, Silva EP, Guenther JN and Wiltbank MC. 2008. Altering the time of the second gonadotropin-releasing hormone injection and artificial insemination (AI) during Ovsynch affects pregnancies per AI in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 91:1044-52. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0409
  7. Butler ST, Pelton SH and Butler WR. 2006. Energy balance, metabolic status, and the first postpartum ovarian follicle wave in cows administered propylene glycol. J. Dairy Sci. 89:2938-2951. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72566-8
  8. Day ML, Burke CR, Taufa VK, Day AM and Macmillan KL. 2000. The strategic use of estradiol to enhance fertility and submission rates of progestin-based estrus synchronization programs in dairy herds. J. Anim. Sci. 78:523-529. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.783523x
  9. Deutscher GH, Stotts JA and Nielsen MK. 1991. Effect of breeding season length and calving season on range cow productivity. J. Anim. Sci. 69:3453-3460. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6993453x
  10. Dobson H, Walker SL, Morris MJ, Routly JE and Smith RF. 2008. Why is it getting more difficult to successfully artificially inseminate dairy cows? Animal 2:1104-1111.
  11. Edmonson AJ, Lean IJ, Weaver LD, Farver T and Webster G. 1989. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 72:68-8. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79081-0
  12. Gebeyehu G, Kelay B and Abebe B. 2007. Effect of parity, season and year on reproductive performance and herd life of Friesian cows at Stella private dairy farm, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19(7):1-8.
  13. Gillund P, Reksen O, Grohn YT and Karlberg K. 2001. Body condition related to ketosis and reproductive performance in Norwegian dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1390-1396. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)70170-1
  14. Hafez ESE and Hafez B. 2000. Reproduction in Farm Animals. 7th ed, Lipincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 159-171.
  15. Honparkhe M, Singh J, Dadarwal D, Dhaliwal GS and Kumar A. 2008. Estrus induction and fertility rates in response to exogenous hormonal administration in postpartum anestrous and subestrus bovines and buffaloes. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 70:1237-1331.
  16. Houghton PL, Lemenager RP, Horstman LA, Hendrix KS and Moss GE. 2000. Effects of body composition, pre- and postpartum energy level and early weaning on reproductive performance of beef cows and preweaning calf gain. J. Anim. Sci. 68:1438-1446.
  17. Kang BK, Choi HS, Son CH, Oh KS, Kang HK, Kim SJ, Kim HJ and Kim NK. 1995. Progesterone assays as an aid for improving reproductive efficiency in dairy cattle. V. Plasma progesterone determination as applied to the differential diagnosis of reproductive disorders and judgement of treatment responses to $PGF_{2{\alpha}}$ or GnRH treatment. Korean J. Vet. Res. 35:603-613.
  18. Kim BH, Lee SK, Kim IH and Kang HG. 2009. The effect of parity and calving seasons on the reproductive performance of Korean native cows. J. Emb. Trans. 24:127-130.
  19. Kim UH, Suh GH, Hur TY, Kanf SJ, Beak KS, Park SB, Kim HS, Kang HG and Kim IH. 2007. The effects of administering estradiol benzo IH.plus progesterone during the growth or static phases of the dominant follicle in CIDR-treated lactating dairy cows. J. Reprod. Dev. 53:591-596. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.18138
  20. Kim UH, Suh GH, Nam HW, Kang HG and Kim IH. 2005. Follicularwave emergence, luteal function and synchrony of ovulation following GnRH or estradiol benzoate in a CIDR-treated, lactating Holstein cows. Theriogenology 63:260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.04.005
  21. Lamb GC, Dahlen CR, Larson JE, Marquezini G and Stevenson JS. 2010. Control of the estrous cycle to improve fertility for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle: A review. J. Anim. Sci. (Suppl.) 88:E181-E192. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2349
  22. Lee JY and Kim IH. 2006. Advancing parity is associated with high milk production at the cost of body condition and increased periparturient disorders in dairy herds. J. Vet. Sci. 7:161-166. https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2006.7.2.161
  23. Leitman NR, Busch DC, Wilson DJ, Mallory DA, Ellersieck MR, Smith MF and Patterson DJ. 2009. Comparison of controlled internal drug release insert-based protocols to synchronize estrus in prepubertal and estrous-cycling beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 87:3976-3982. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2250
  24. Melendez P, Duchens M, Perez A, Moraga L and Archbald L. 2008. Characterization of estrus detection, conception and pregnancy risk of Holstein cattle from the central area of Chile. Theriogenology 70:631-637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.04.033
  25. Mialot JP, Laumonnier G, Ponsart C, Fauxpoint H, Barassin E, Ponter AA and Deletang F. 1999. Postpartum subestrus in dairy cows: comparison of treatment with prostaglandin $F_{2}$ alpha or GnRH + prostaglandin $F_{2}$ alpha + GnRH. Theriogenology 52(5):901-911. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00181-8
  26. Miller RH, Norman HD, Kuhn MT, Clay JS and Hutchison JL. 2007. Voluntary waiting period and adoption of synchronized breeding in dairy herd improvement herds. J. Dairy Sci. 90:1594-606. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71645-4
  27. Moreira F, De la Sota RL, Diaz T and Thatcher WW. 2000. Effect of day of the estrous cycle at the initiation of a timed artificial insemination protocol on reproductive responses of dairy heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 78:1568-1576. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.7861568x
  28. Morrison DG, Spitzer JC and Perkins JL. 1999. Influence of prepartum body condition score change on reproduction in multiparous beef cows calving in moderate body condition. J. Anim. Sci. 77:1048-1054. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7751048x
  29. Portaluppi MA and Stevenson JS. 2005. Pregnancy rates in lactating dairy cows after presynchronization of estrous cycles and variations of the Ovsynch protocol. J. Dairy Sci. 88:914-921. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72758-2
  30. Roelofs J, Lopez-Gatius F, Hunter RHF, van Eerdenburg FJCM and Hanzen CH. 2010. When is a cow in estrus? Clinical and practical aspects. Theriogenology 74:327-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.02.016
  31. Sakaguchi M. 2011. Practical aspects of the fertility of dairy cows. J. Reprod. Dev. 57:17-33. https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.10-197E
  32. SAS. 1999. Users Guide: Statistics, Version 8. 1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  33. Short RE, Bellows RA, Staigmiller RB, Berardinelli JG and Custer EE. 1990. Physiological mechanisms controlling anestrus and infertility in postpartum beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 68:799-816. https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.683799x
  34. Son CH, Kang HG and Kim SH. 2001. Application of progesterone measurement for age and body weight at puberty, and postpartum anestrus in Korean native cattle. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 63:1287-1291. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.63.1287
  35. Spitzer JC, Morrison DG, Wettemann RP and Faulkner LC. 1995. Reproductive responses and calf birth and weaning weights as affected by body condition at parturition and postpartum weight gain in primiparous beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 73:1251-1257. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7351251x
  36. Sterry RA, Jardon PW and Fricke PM. 2007. Effect of timing of Cosynch on fertility of lactating Holstein cows after first postpartum and Resynch timed-AI services. Theriogenology 67:1211-1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.01.004
  37. Stevenson JS, Kobayashi Y and Thompson KE. 1999. Reproductive performance of dairy cows in various programmed breeding systems including Ovsynch and combinations of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and prostaglandin $F_{2{\alpha}}$. J. Dairy Sci. 82:506-515. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75261-6
  38. Stevenson JS, Smith JF and Hawkins DE. 2000. Reproductive outcomes for dairy heifers treated with combinations of prostaglandin $F_{2}$alpha, norgestomet, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2008-2015. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75079-X
  39. Tenhagen BA, Surholt R, Wittke M, Vogel C, Drillich M and Heuwieser W. 2004. Use of Ovsynch in dairy herds-differences between primiparous and multiparous cows. Anim. Repeod. Sci. 81:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.08.009
  40. Walsh S, Buckley F, Berry DP, Rath M, Pierce K, Byrne N and Dillon P. 2007. Effects of breed, feeding system, and parity on udder health and milking characteristics. J. Dairy Sci. 90:5767-5779. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0389
  41. Wettemann RP, Lents CA, Ciccioli NH, White FJ and Rubio I. 2003. Nutritional- and suckling-mediated anovulation in beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 81:E48-E59. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.81suppl_348x
  42. Zuluaga JF, Saldarriaga JP, Cooper DA, Cartmill JA and Williams GL. 2010. Presynchronization with gonadotropin-releasing hormone increases the proportion of Bos indicus-influenced females ovulating at initiation of synchronization but fails to improve synchronized new follicular wave emergence or fixed-time artificial insemination conception rates using intravaginal progesterone, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, and prostaglandin $F_2{\alpha}^1$. J. Anim. Sci. 88(5):1663-1671.