A Comparison of Neighborhood Definition Methods for Spatial Autocorrelation

공간자기상관 산출을 위한 인접성 정의 방법 비교

  • Received : 2011.06.19
  • Accepted : 2011.08.14
  • Published : 2011.09.30

Abstract

For the identifying of spatial distribution pattern, Moran's Index(I) which has the range of values from -1 to +1 is common method for the spatial autocorrelation measurement. When I is close to 1, all neighboring features have close to the same value, indicating clustered pattern. Conversely, if the spatial pattern is dispersed, I is close to -1. And I closing to 0 means spatially random pattern. However, this index equation is influenced by how defining the neighboring features for target feature. To compare and understand the difference of neighborhood definition methods, fixed distance neighboring method and Gabriel Network method were used for I. In this study, these two methods were applied to two marine environments with water quality data. One is Gwangyang Bay which has complex geometric coastal structure located in South Sea of Korea. Another is Uljin area adjacent to open sea located in east coast of Korea. The distances between water quality observed locations were relatively regular in Gwangyang Bay, however, irregular in Uljin area. And for the fixed distance method popular Arc GIS tool was used, but, for the Gabriel Network, Visual Basic program was developed to produce Gabriel Network and calculate Moran's I and its Z-score automatically. According to this experimental results, different spatial pattern was showed differently for some data with using of neighboring definition methods. Therefore there is need to choose neighboring definition method carefully for spatial pattern analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. 한국전력공사 전력연구원(2001). 울진원자력 발전소 주변 일반 환경조사 및 평가보고서(2000년보), 332.
  2. 한국전력공사 전력연구원(2002). 울진원자력 발전소 주변 일반 환경조사 및 평가보고서(2001년보), 275.
  3. 한국해양연구원(2003). 남해 특별관리 해역의 환경오염 관리모델 연구(1) 광양만 중심 연구, BSPE 836-001577-7, 823.
  4. Amaud, J.F., L. Madec, A. Guller and A. Bellido(2001). Spatial analysis of allozyme and microsatellite DNA polymorphisms in the land snail Helix aspersa (Gastropoda: Helicidae), Molecular Ecology 10:1563-1576. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01292.x
  5. Choi, H.W., K.H. Kim and C.Y. Lee(2007). Application of spatila autocorrelation for the spatial distribution pattern alalysis of marine environment, Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information Studies 10:60-74.
  6. Cliff, A.D. and J.K. Ord(1973). Spatial autocorrelation, London Pion.
  7. Gabriel, K.R. and R.R. Sokal(1969). A new statistical approach to geographic variation analysis, Systematic Zoology 18:259-270. https://doi.org/10.2307/2412323
  8. Legendre, P. and L. Legendre(1998). Developments in environmental modeling, Numerical ecology.
  9. Moran, P.A.P(1948). The international of statistical maps, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (methological) 10: 243-251.
  10. Schweiger, O., M. Frenzel and W. Durka(2004). Spatial genetic structure in a metapopulation of the land snail Cepaea nemoralis(Gastropoda: Helicidae), Molecular Ecology 13:3645-3655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02357.x
  11. Smith, M.J, M.F. Goodchild and P.A Longley(2007). Geospatial Analysis(A Comprehensive Guide to Principles, Techniques and Software Tools), Winchelsea Press 394.