에너지공학 (Journal of Energy Engineering)

  • 제20권4호
  • /
  • Pages.267-277
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1598-7981(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-7074(eISSN)
한국에너지학회 (The Korean Society for Energy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

후발국 신재생에너지기술개발의 동력: 한국의 신재생에너지기술개발사업 사례연구

The Socio-technical Constituency behind New & Renewable Energy Technology Development in a Latecomer: The Case study of New & Renewable Technology Program of Korea

  • 임홍탁 (제주대학교 원자력과학기술연구소) ;
  • 김신 (제주대학교 에너지공학과)
  • Lim, Hong-Tak (Institute for Nuclear Science and Technology, Jeju National University) ;
  • Kim, Sin (Department of Nuclear and Energy Engineering, Jeju National University)
  • 투고 : 2011.05.12
  • 심사 : 2011.11.23
  • 발행 : 2011.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

후발국에서의 신재생에너지기술의 개발은 어떤 힘에 의해서 추동될까? 후발국의 '녹색 성장'은 '녹색'의 가치 실현을 위해서 추동되는가 아니면 '성장'을 지속하기 위한 새로운 분야의 개척인가? 본 연구는 한국의 신재생에너지 기술개발사업 사례 분석을 통해 후발국 신재생에너지기술개발의 동력에 대한 이해를 돕고자 한다. 환경문제와 기술개발, 기술개발과 '사회기술연맹' 그리고 후발국 '권위주의적 발전국가론'에 대한 기존의 논의를 통해 기술 개발의 동력은 사회기술연맹의 구성에서 찾을 수 있다는 것에 착안하여 연구의 틀을 구성하였고 이를 토대로 선발국 덴마크와 독일의 사례를 분석한 후 한국의 신재생에너지기술개발사업 사례를 분석하였다. 한국은 선진국과는 다르게 산업계와 정부 주도의 성장동맹을 바탕으로 신재생에너지기술개발이 추진되었고 환경시민단체는 정부의 시민단체 국정 참여 정책에 힘입어 신재생에너지정책협의회에 참여함으로써 사회기술연맹을 구성하였다. 따라서 한국의 신재생에너지 사회기술연맹은 '녹색'의 가치 실현보다는 '성장'중심이라는 한계를 갖는다.

The study looks at the development of new & renewable technology in a latecomer country, Korea. The main question is whether the development is driven by 'green demand' from the people or by the 'growth demand' from the industry. It also asks what are the characteristics of socio-technical constituency behind the development of new & renewable energy technology; growth-centered or environment-centered. It is found out that a 'New & renewable energy technology socio-techical constituency', consisted of NGOs, industry and government in the form of membership to New & Renwable Energy Policy Council of the government program, was established driving the development of new & renewable energy technology development in Korea. Yet, the coalition among them was based on 'the desire for growth' rather than 'the concern for environment'. The changes in authoritarian development state such as the adoption of governance approach to public decision-making process also contributed to the formation of the constituency.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Unruh, G. C. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 2000 28, 817-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
  2. OECD/NEA, Renewable Energy: Market Policy Trends in IEA Countries, 2004, Paris, OECD.
  3. Weart, S. The Discovery of Global Warming, Cambridge & London, Harvard University Press. 2003.
  4. Turner, R.K., D. Pearce and I. Bateman , Environmental Economics, 1994, Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  5. Nelson, R. R. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 1959, 67, 148-163.
  6. Callon, M. Is Science a Public Good?. Science, Technology and Human Values, 1994, 19, 395-424. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399401900401
  7. Porter, M.E.; van der Linde, C.. Towards a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship, Journal of Economic Perspective, 1995, 9(4), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
  8. Jaffe, A.B.; Newell, R.G.; Stavins, R.G.. Environmental policy and technological change, Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 22, 41-69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015519401088
  9. Beise, M.; Rennings, K.. Lead Markets and regulation: a framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations, Ecological Economics, 2005, 52, 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.007
  10. Hughes, T.. The Evolution of Large Technological System. IN BIJKER, HUGHES and PINCH (Eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems, 1987, Cambridge and London, MIT Press.
  11. Arthur, W.B.. Competing technologies: an overview, IN DOSI, FREEMAN, NELSON, SILVERBERG & SOETE (Eds.) Technical change and Economic Theory, 1998, London, Pinter.
  12. Cowan, Robin. Nuclear Power Reactors: A Study of Technological Lock-In, Journal of Economic History, 1990, 50, 541-566. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700037153
  13. Molina, A.H.. Understanding the emergence of a largescale European initiative in technology, Science and Public Policy, 1994, 21(1), 31-41.
  14. Gerschenkron, A.. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective, 1962, Cambridge, Havard University Press.
  15. Amsden, A.. Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization, 1989, New York, Oxford University Press.
  16. Wade, R.. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization, 1991, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.
  17. Chang, H.-J.. The Political Economy of Industrial Policy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1994, 17, 131-157.
  18. Kim, K.-D.. Confucianism and Capitalist Development in East Asia. IN SKLAIR, L. (Ed.) Capitalism and Development,. 1994, London and New York, Routledge.
  19. Vivek, C.. Building a Developmental State: The Korean Case reconsidered. Politics Society, 1999, 27, 309-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329299027003002
  20. Vivek, C.. The Politics of a Miracle: Class Interests and State Power in Korean Developmentalism. IN COATES, D. (Ed.) Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Approaches. 2005, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
  21. Karnoe, P.. Technological Innovation and Industrial Organisation in the Danish wind industry. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1990, 2, 105-123. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629000000008
  22. Jorgensen, U. & Karnoe, P.. The Danish Wind-Turbine Story: Technical Solution to Political Vision? IN RIP, A., MISA, T. J. & SCHOT, J. (Eds.) Managing Technology in Society. 1995, London and New York, Pinter publishers.
  23. Bergek, A. & Jacobsson, S.. The Emergence of a Growth Industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries. IN METCALFE, J. S. & CANTNER, U. (Eds.) Change, Transformation and Development. 2003, Heidelberg, New York, Physica-Verlag.
  24. Jacobsson, S. & Bergek, A.. Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2004, 13, 815-849. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth032
  25. Jacobsson, S., Sanden, B. A. & Bangens, L.. Transforming the Energy System - the Evolution of the German Technological System for Solar Cells. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2004, 16, 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953732032000199061
  26. 지식경제부, 신재생에너지정책위원회 위원명단, 2009, 한국공공정보공개시스템.
  27. 산업자원부 고시 2002-108.
  28. 산업자원부, 제2차 신재생에너지기술개발.이용.보급 10개년계획(2003-2012), 2003, 산업자원부.
  29. 산업자원부, 에너지관리공단, 신재생에너지센타 신재생 에너지기술개발사업 보고서 2006, 2007, 과천, 신재생에너지센타.
  30. 재정경제부 외, '차세대 성장동력 추진계획', 2003, 재정경제부 외.
  31. 성지은 과학기술정책결정구조의 변화: 참여정부 과학기술행정체계개편을 중심으로, 행정논총, 2006, 44권 1호, 243-244.
  32. 지식경제부, 지식경제부 공고 2008-296, 2008.

피인용 문헌

  1. Reduction of Heat Generation from Junction Box in 3 kW Photovoltaic Power Generation System vol.17, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4313/TEEM.2016.17.1.21