DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Enzyme Activity of Cenococcum geophilum Isolates on Enzyme-specific Solid Media

  • Obase, Keisuke (College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Yong (College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Chun, Kun-Woo (College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Kyu (College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2011.03.24
  • Accepted : 2011.05.13
  • Published : 2011.06.30

Abstract

Enzyme activities of Cenococcum geophilum isolates were examined on enzyme- specific solid media. Deoxyribonuclease, phosphatase, and urease were detected in all isolates, whereas cellulase was not detected in any of the isolates. Variations in enzyme activities of amylase, caseinolysis, gelatinase, lipase, and ribonuclease were observed among isolates.

Keywords

References

  1. Smith SE, Read DJ. Mycorrhizal symbiosis. 2nd ed. London: Academic Press; 1997.
  2. Agerer R. Exploration types of ectomycorrhizae: a proposal to classify ectomycorrhizal mycelial systems according to their patterns of differentiation and putative ecological importance. Mycorrhiza 2001;11:107-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005720100108
  3. Hobbie JE, Hobbie EA. $^{15}N$ in symbiotic fungi and plants estimates nitrogen and carbon flux rates in arctic Tundra. Ecology 2006;87:816-22. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[816:NISFAP]2.0.CO;2
  4. Torres Aquino M, Plassard C. Dynamics of ectomycorrhizal mycelial growth and P transfer to the host plant in response to low and high soil P availability. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2004;48:149-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2004.01.008
  5. Nygren CM, Edqvist J, Elfstrand M, Heller G, Taylor AF. Detection of extracellular protease activity in different species and genera of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycorrhiza 2007;17:241-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-006-0100-7
  6. Louche J, Ali MA, Cloutier-Hurteau B, Sauvage FX, Quiquampoix H, Plassard C. Efficiency of acid phosphatases secreted from the ectomycorrhizal fungus Hebeloma cylindrosporum to hydrolyse organic phosphorus in podzols. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2010;73:323-35.
  7. Trappe JM. Mycorrhizal hosts and distribution of Cenococcum graniforme. Lloydia 1964;27:100-6.
  8. LoBuglio KF. Cenococcum. In: Cairney JW, Chambers SM, editors. Ectomycorrhizal fungi: key genera in profile. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1999. p. 287-309.
  9. Obase K, Cha JY, Lee JK, Lee SY, Lee JH, Chun KW. Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities associated with Pinus thunbergii in the eastern coastal pine forests of Korea. Mycorrhiza 2009;20:39-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-009-0262-1
  10. Obase K, Lee JK, Lee SK, Lee SY, Chun KW. Variation of sodium chloride resistance in Cenococcum geophilum and Suillus granulatus isolates in liquid culture. Micobiology 2010;38:225-8. https://doi.org/10.4489/MYCO.2010.38.3.225
  11. Bae KS, Barton LL. Alkaline phosphatase and other hydrolyases produced by Cenococcum graniforme, an ectomycorrhizal fungus. Appl Environ Microbiol 1989;55:2511-6.
  12. Trappe JM. Studies on Cenococcum graniforme. I. An efficient method for isolation from sclerotia. Can J Bot 1969;47:1389-90. https://doi.org/10.1139/b69-198
  13. Marx DH. The influence of ectotrophic mycorrhizal fungi on the resistance of pine roots to pathogenic infections: I. antagonism of mycorrhizal fungi to root pathogenic fungi and soil bacteria. Phytopathology 1969;59:153-63.
  14. Hankin L, Anagnostakis SL. The use of solid media for detection of enzyme production by fungi. Mycologia 1975;67:597-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/3758395
  15. Paterson RR, Bridge PD. Biochemical techniques for filamentous fungi: IMI technical handbook No. 1. Wallingford: CAB International; 1994.
  16. Pointing SB. Qualitative methods for the determination of lignocellulolytic enzyme production by tropical fungi. Fungal Divers 1999;2:17-33.
  17. Vuye A, Pijck J. Urease activity of enterobacteriaceae: which medium to choose. Appl Microbiol 1973;26:850-4.
  18. Fermor TR, Wood DA. Degradation of bacteria by Agaricus bisporus and other fungi. J Gen Microbiol 1981;126:377-87.
  19. Reyes F, Villanueva P, Alfonso C. Nucleases in the autolysis of filamentous fungi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1990;69:67-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb04176.x
  20. Dighton J. Phosphatase production by mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 1983;71:455-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182686
  21. Sylvia DM. Short root densities and surface phosphatase activities of ectomycorrhizal morphotypes in a slash pine plantation. J Sustain For 2000;11:83-93.
  22. Mejstrik VK, Krause HH. Uptake of $^{32}P$ by Pinus radiata roots inoculated with Suillus luteus and Cenococcum graniforme from different sources of available phosphate. New Phytol 1973;72:137-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1973.tb02018.x
  23. Hutchison LJ. Studies on the systematics of ectomycorrhizal fungi in axenic culture. II. The enzymatic degradation of selected carbon and nitrogen compounds. Can J Bot 1990;68:1522-30. https://doi.org/10.1139/b90-194
  24. Yamanaka T. Utilization of inorganic and organic nitrogen in pure cultures by saprotrophic and ectomycorrhizal fungi producing sporophores on urea-treated forest floor. Mycol Res 1999;103:811-6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756298007801
  25. Imamura A, Yumoto T. Recovery of mycorrhizas of a fungus, Cenococcum geophilum, after urea treatment in warm temperate forests in Japan. Mycoscience 2004;45:357-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10267-004-0193-9
  26. Caldwell BA, Castellano MA, Griffiths RP. Fatty acid esterase production by ectomycorrhizal fungi. Mycologia 1991;83:233-6. https://doi.org/10.2307/3759942
  27. El-Badaoui K, Botton B. Production and characterization of exocellular proteases in ectomycorrhizal fungi. Ann For Sci 1989;46(Suppl):728s-30s. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:198905ART0161
  28. Ramstedt M, Soderhall K. Protease, phenoloxidase and pectinase activities in mycorrhizal fungi. Trans Br Mycol Soc 1983;81:157-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(83)80220-4

Cited by

  1. Revisiting phylogenetic diversity and cryptic species of Cenococcum geophilum sensu lato vol.26, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-016-0690-7