Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology (한국해양공학회지)

Korean Society of Ocean Engineers (한국해양공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Plasticity and Fracture Behaviors of Marine Structural Steel, Part III: Experimental Study on Failure Strain

조선 해양 구조물용 강재의 소성 및 파단 특성 III: 파단 변형률에 관한 실험적 연구

  • Choung, Joon-Mo (Dep't of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Shim, Chun-Sik (Dep't of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, Mokpo National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Su (Dep't of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, Inha University)
  • 정준모 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과) ;
  • 심천식 (국립목포대학교 조선공학과) ;
  • 김경수 (인하대학교 조선해양공학과)
  • Received : 2011.02.28
  • Accepted : 2011.06.20
  • Published : 2011.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This is the third of several companion papers dealing with the derivation of material constants for ductile failure criteria under hydrostatic stress. It was observed that the ultimate engineering stresses and elongations at fracture from tensile tests for round specimens with various notch radii tended to increase and decrease, respectively, because of the stress triaxiality. The engineering stress curves from tests are compared with numerical simulation results, and it is proved that the curves from the two approaches very closely coincide. Failure strains are obtained from the equivalent plastic strain histories from numerical simulations at the time when the experimental engineering stress drops suddenly. After introducing the new concept of average stress triaxiality and accumulated average strain energy, the material constants of the Johnson-Cook failure criterion for critical energies of 100%, 50%, and 15% are presented. The experimental results obtained for EH-36 steel were in relatively good agreement with the 100% critical energy, whereas the literature states that aluminum fits with a 15% critical energy. Therefore, it is expected that a unified failure criterion for critical energy, which is available for most kinds of ductile materials, can be provided according to the used materials.

Keywords

References

  1. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (2004). E 8 - 04 Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.
  2. Bao, Y., Wierzbicki, T. (2004). "On Fracture Locus in the Equivalent Strain and Stress Triaxiality space", International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol 46, pp 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006
  3. Bridgman, P.W. (1964). Studies in large plastic Row and fracture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Choung, J., Shim, C.S. and Kim, K.S. (2011a). "Plasticity and Fracture Behaviors of a Marine Structural Steel, Part I: Theoretical Backgrounds of Strain Hardening and Rate Hardening", Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology (to be published).
  5. Choung, J., Shim, C.S. and Kim, K.S. (2011b). "Plasticity and Fracture Behaviors of a Marine Structural Steel, Part II: Theoretical Backgrounds of Fracture", Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology (to be published).
  6. Choung, J. (2009). "Comparative studies of fracture models for marine structural steels", Ocean Engineering, Vol 36, pp 1164-1174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.08.003
  7. Choung, J. and Cho, S.R. (2008). "Study on True Stress Correction from Tensile Tests", Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, Vol 22, pp 1039-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-008-0302-3
  8. Dey, S., Borvik, T., Hopperstad, O.S. and Langseth, M. (2006). "On the Influence of Fracture Criterion in Projectile Impact of Steel Plates", Computational Materials Science, Vol 38, pp 176-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2006.02.003
  9. Gupta, N.K., Iqbal, M.A. and Sekhon, G.S. (2006). "Experimental and Numerical Studies on the Behavior of Thin Aluminum Plates Subjected to Impact by Blunt- and Hemispherical-nosed Projectiles", International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol 32, pp 1921-1944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.06.007
  10. Health and Safety Executive (2001). Offshore Technology Report OTO 2001/020-Elevated Temperature and High Strain Rate Properties of Offshore Steels.
  11. Nemat-Nasser, S. and Guo, W.G. (2003). "Thermomechanical Response of DH-36 Structural Steel over a Wide Range of Strain Rates and Temperature", Mech. Mat., Vol. 35, pp. 1023-1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6636(02)00323-X
  12. Teng, X., Wierzbicki, T., Hiermaier, S. and Rohr, I. (2005). "Numerical Prediction of Fracture in the Taylor Test", International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol 42, pp 2929-2948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.09.039

Cited by

  1. Formulation of Failure Strain according to Average Stress Triaxiality of Low Temperature High Strength Steel (EH36) vol.27, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2013.27.2.019
  2. Fracture Simulation of Low-Temperature High-Strength Steel (EH36) using User-Subroutine of Commercial Finite Element Code vol.28, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2014.28.1.034
  3. Development of Three Dimensional Fracture Strain Surface in Average Stress Triaxiaility and Average Normalized Lode Parameter Domain for Arctic High Tensile Steel: Part I Theoretical Background and Experimental Studies vol.29, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2015.29.6.445
  4. Development of Three-Dimensional Fracture Strain Surface in Average Stress Triaxiaility and Average Normalized Lode Parameter Domain for Arctic High Tensile Steel: Part II Formulation of Fracture Strain Surface vol.29, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2015.29.6.454
  5. Punching Fracture Simulations of Circular Unstiffened Steel Plates using Three-dimensional Fracture Surface vol.30, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5574/KSOE.2016.30.6.474
  6. Ductile Fracture Predictions of High Strength Steel (EH36) using Linear and Non-Linear Damage Evolution Models vol.31, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.26748/KSOE.2017.08.31.4.288
  7. Mechanical and Immersion Characteristics of Weled EH36 Steel with Different Heat Input vol.22, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9726/kspse.2018.22.3.051