References
- 고은성, 이경화 (2007). GSP 환경에서의 중학교 수학영재 학생들의 문제 해결 과정 분석 시각적 추론과 논리적 추론을 중심으로. 영재교육연구, 17(3), 521-539.
- 고은성, 이경화 (2011). 예비교사들의 통계적 표집에 대한 이해. 수학교육학연구, 21(1), 17-32.
- 고은성, 이경화, 송상헌 (2008a). 시각적 사고와 분석적 사고 사이에서 이미지의 역할. 학교수학, 18(1), 63-78.
- 고은성, 이경화, 송상헌 (2008b). 수학영재 학생들의 정다면체 정의 구성 활동 분석. 영재교육연구, 18(1), 53-77.
- 김민정, 이경화, 송상헌 (2008). 초등 수학영재의 대수적 사고 특성에 관한 분석. 학교수학, 10(1), 23-42.
- 김지원, 송상헌 (2004). 한 수학영재아의 수학적 사고 특성에 관한 사례 연구. 수학교육학연구, 14(1), 89-110.
- 나귀수, 이경화, 한대희, 송상헌 (2007). 수학 영재 학생들의 조건부 확률 문제해결 방법. 학교수학, 9(3), 397-408.
- 류현아, 정영옥, 송상헌 (2007). 입체도형에 대한 6-7학년 수학영재들의 공간시각화 능력 분석. 학교수학, 9(2), 277-289.
- 성태제 (2002). 타당도와 신뢰도. 학지사: 서울
- 송상헌, 신은주 (2007). 수학 영재의 추상화 학습에서 기호의 의미 작용 과정 사례 분석. 학교수학, 9(1), 161-180.
- 송상헌, 임재훈, 정영옥, 권석일, 김지원 (2007). 초등수학영재들이 페그퍼즐 과제에서 보여주는 대수적 일반화 과정 분석. 수학교육학연구, 17(2), 163-178.
- 송상헌, 장혜원, 정영옥 (2006a). 초등학교 6학년 수학영재들의 기하 과제 증명 능력에 관한 사례 분석. 수학교육학연구, 16(4), 327-344.
- 송상헌, 허지연, 임재훈 (2006b). 도형의 최대 분할 과제에서 초등학교 수학 영재들이 보여주는 정당화의 유형 분석. 수학교육학연구, 16(1), 79-94.
- 이경화, 최남광, 송상헌 (2007). 수학영재들의 아르키메데스 다면체 탐구 과정 - 정당화 과정과 표현 과정을 중심으로. 학교수학, 9(4), 487-505.
- 이경화, 유연주, 홍진곤, 박민선, 박미미 (2010). 수학 우수아의 통계적 개념 이해도 조사. 학교수학, 12(4), 547-561.
- 이외숙, 임용빈, 성내경, 소병수 (2000). 통계학 입문(제2판). 서울: 경문사.
- Australian Education Council. (1991). A national statement on mathematics for Australian schools. Australia, Carlton, Vic.: Author. [http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED428947.pdf]
- Batanero, C., Henry, M., & Parzysz, B. (2005). The nature of chance and probability. In G. A. Jones(Ed.), Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 15-37). New York, NY: Springer.
- Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The Solo Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
- Carmona, M. J. (2004). Mathematical background and attitudes toward statistics in a sample of undergraduate students. Paper presented at the 10th International Congress on Mathematics Education, Copenhagen, Denmark. [http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/-iase/publications/ 11/Carmona.doc]
- Chance, B., delMas, R., & Garfield, J. (2004). Reasoning about sampling distributions. In D. Ben-Zvi, & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 295-324). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Chiesi, F., & Primi, C. (2010). Cognitive and non-cognitive factors related to students' statistics achievement. Statistics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 6-26.
- Cobb, G. W., & Moore, D. S. (1997). Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. The American Mathematical Monthly, 104(9), 801-823. https://doi.org/10.2307/2975286
- delMas, R. C. (2004). A comparison of mathematical and statistical reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi, & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 79-95). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Department for Education. (1999). Mathematics: The National Curriculum for England. Wellington, New Zealand: Author. [http://publications.education.gov.uk/eOrderingDownload/ QCA-99-460.pdf]
- Dreyfus, T., & Tsamir, P. (2004). Ben's consolidation of knowledge structures about infinite sets. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23(3), 271-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2004.06.002
- Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportion. New York: Wiley.
- Greenes, C. (1981). Identifying the gifted student in mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher, 28(6), 14-17.
- Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
- Howley, C. B., Pendarvis, E. D., & Howley, A. (1986). Teaching gifted children, principles and strategies. Boston Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.
- Ko, E. S., & Lee, K. H. (2011). Are mathematically talented elementary students also talented in statistics? In B. Sriraman, & K. H. Lee, The elements of creativity and giftedness in mathematics (pp. 29-43). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
- Krutetskii, V. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
- Lalonde, R. N., & Gardner, R. C. (1993). Statistics as a second language?: A model for predicting performance in psychology students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 25(1), 108-125. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078792
- Lee, K. (2005). Three types of reasoning and creative informal proofs by mathematically gifted students. Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 241-248. Melbourne, Australia.
- Limm, S. (1984). The characteristics approach: Identification and beyond. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(4), 181-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628402800408
- Lipson, K. (2002). The role of computer based technology in developing understanding of the sampling distribution. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Teaching Statistics. [CD-ROM] Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistics Institute.
- Ministry of Education. (1992). Mathematics in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Author. [http://www.minedu.govt.nz/-/media/MinEdu/Files/EducationSectors/Schools/ MathematicsInTheNZCurriculum.pdf]
- Moore, D. S. (1990). Uncertainty. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), On the shoulders of giants (pp. 95-137). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Moore, D. S. (1997). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review, 65(2), 123-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.1997.tb00390.x
- Moore, D. S., & Cobb, G. W. (2000). Statistics and mathematics: Tension and cooperation. The American Mathematical Monthly, 107(7), 615-630. https://doi.org/10.2307/2589117
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- Pfannkuch, M. (2008). Building sampling concepts for statistical inference: A case study, paper presented at the ICME 2008 TSG. Monterrey, Mexico. [http://tsg.icme11.org/document/get/476]
- Rubin, A., Bruce, B., & Tenney, Y. (1991). Learning about sampling: Trouble at the core of statistics. In D. Vere-Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Teaching Statistics (pp. 314-319). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
- Saldanha, L., & Thompson, P. (2002). Conceptions of sample and their relationship to statistical inference. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51, 257-270. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023692604014
- Schneider, W. (2000). Giftedness, expertise, and exceptional performance: A developmental perspective. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 165-178). NY: Elsevier.
- Snee, R. D. (1990). Statistical thinking and its contribution to total quality. The American Statistician, 44(2), 116-121. https://doi.org/10.2307/2684144
- Sriraman, B. (2003). Mathematical giftedness, problem solving, and the ability to formulate generalizations: The problem-solving experiences of four gifted students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 151-165.
- Sriraman, B. (2004). Gifted ninth graders' notions of proof: Investigating parallels in approaches of mathematically gifted students and professional mathematicians. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(4), 267-292.
- Tsamir, P., & Dreyfus, T. (2002). Comparing infinite sets - a process of abstraction: The case of Ben. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00100-1
- Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (2000). Developing concepts of sampling. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 44-70. https://doi.org/10.2307/749819
- Wheatley, G. H. (1983). Mathematics curriculum for the gifted and talented. In J. VanTassel-Vaska, & S. M. Reis (Eds.), Curriculum for gifted and talented students (pp.137-146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223-265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.1999.tb00442.x