The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Initial bacterial adhesion on resin, titanium and zirconia in vitro

  • Lee, Byung-Chul (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jung, Gil-Yong (Interdisciplinary Program for Bioengineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Dae-Joon (Department of Advanced Material Engineering, Sejong University) ;
  • Han, Jung-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2011.04.05
  • Accepted : 2011.04.22
  • Published : 2011.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the adhesion of initial colonizer, Streptococcus sanguis, on resin, titanium and zirconia under the same surface polishing condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Specimens were prepared from Z-250, cp-Ti and 3Y-TZP and polished with $1 {\mu}m$ diamond paste. After coating with saliva, each specimen was incubated with Streptococcus sanguis. Scanning electron microscope, crystal violet staining and measurement of fluorescence intensity resulting from resazurin reduction were performed for quantifying the bacterial adhesion. RESULTS. Surface of resin composite was significantly rougher than that of titanium and zirconia, although all tested specimens are classified as smooth. The resin specimens showed lower value of contact angle compared with titanium and zirconia specimens, and had hydrophilic surfaces. The result of scanning electron microscopy demonstrated that bound bacteria were more abundant on resin in comparison with titanium and zirconia. When total biofilm mass determined by crystal violet, absorbance value of resin was significantly higher than that of titanium or zirconia. The result of relative fluorescence intensities also demonstrated that the highest fluorescence intensity was found on the surface of resin. Absorbance value and fluorescence intensity on titanium was not significantly different from those on zirconia. CONCLUSION. Resin specimens showed the roughest surface and have a significantly higher susceptibility to adhere Streptococcus sanguis than titanium and zirconia when surfaces of each specimen were polished under same condition. There was no significant difference in bacteria adhesion between titanium and zirconia in vitro.

Keywords

References

  1. Filoche S, Wong L, Sissons CH. Oral biofilms: emerging concepts in microbial ecology. J Dent Res 2010;89:8-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509351812
  2. Scheie AA, Petersen FC. The biofilm concept: consequences for future prophylaxis of oral diseases? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004;15:4-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/154411130401500102
  3. Ono M, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Imai S, Hanada N, Tagami J, Matin K. Surface properties of resin composite materials relative to biofilm formation. Dent Mater J 2007;26:613-22. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.613
  4. Hojo K, Nagaoka S, Ohshima T, Maeda N. Bacterial interactions in dental biofilm development. J Dent Res 2009;88:982-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034509346811
  5. Li J, Helmerhorst EJ, Leone CW, Troxler RF, Yaskell T, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS, Oppenheim FG. Identification of early microbial colonizers in human dental biofilm. J Appl Microbiol 2004;97:1311-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02420.x
  6. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:68-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x
  7. Subramani K, Jung RE, Molenberg A, Hammerle CH. Biofilm on dental implants: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:616-26.
  8. Busscher HJ, Rinastiti M, Siswomihardjo W, van der Mei HC. Biofilm formation on dental restorative and implant materials. J Dent Res 2010;89:657-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510368644
  9. Scarano A, Piattelli M, Caputi S, Favero GA, Piattelli A. Bacterial adhesion on commercially pure titanium and zirconium oxide disks: an in vivo human study. J Periodontol 2004;75:292-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.2.292
  10. Auschill TM, Arweiler NB, Brecx M, Reich E, Sculean A, Netuschil L. The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:48-53. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.2001.101160.x
  11. Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Handel G, Burgers R. Surface characterization of dental ceramics and initial streptococcal adhesion in vitro. Dent Mater 2009;25:969-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.003
  12. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007;35:819-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008
  13. Ikeda M, Matin K, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of surface characteristics on adherence of S. mutans biofilms to indirect resin composites. Dent Mater J 2007;26:915-23. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.915
  14. Pihlstrom BL, Michalowicz BS, Johnson NW. Periodontal diseases. Lancet 2005;366:1809-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67728-8
  15. Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:1-14.
  16. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997;13:258-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3
  17. Al-Ahmad A, Wiedmann-Al-Ahmad M, Faust J, Bachle M, Follo M, Wolkewitz M, Hannig C, Hellwig E, Carvalho C, Kohal R. Biofilm formation and composition on different implant materials in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010;95:101-9.
  18. Puckett SD, Taylor E, Raimondo T, Webster TJ. The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. Biomaterials 2010;31:706-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.081

Cited by

  1. The effect of opposing structures, natural teeth vs. implants on crestal bone levels surrounding single-tooth implants vol.25, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12087
  2. Biofilm Bormation on Titanium and Hydroxyapatite Surface using Artificial Mouth System vol.22, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.22.419
  3. Implant-supported fixed restoration of post-traumatic mandibular defect accompanied with skin grafting: A clinical report vol.5, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.1.67
  4. Implications of Surface and Bulk Properties of Abutment Implants and Their Degradation in the Health of Periodontal Tissue vol.6, pp.12, 2013, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma6125951
  5. Effect of surface roughness of biomaterials on Staphylococcus epidermidis adhesion vol.14, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-014-0234-2
  6. Early Staphylococcal Biofilm Formation on Solid Orthopaedic Implant Materials: In Vitro Study vol.9, pp.10, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107588
  7. Tantalum Nitride-Decorated Titanium with Enhanced Resistance to Microbiologically Induced Corrosion and Mechanical Property for Dental Application vol.10, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130774
  8. Antiseptics and microcosm biofilm formation on titanium surfaces vol.30, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0030
  9. Effect of Bioactive Primers on Bacterial-Induced Secondary Caries at the Tooth-Resin Interface vol.42, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2341/16-107-L
  10. Full mouth rehabilitation of edentulous patient with intellectual disability using implants and monolithic zirconia vol.55, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2017.55.2.156
  11. Full mouth rehabilitation in a patient with partial mandibulectomy using CAD/CAM zirconia framework and monolithic zirconia vol.55, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2017.55.3.279
  12. In Vitro Biofilm Formation on Titanium and Zirconia Implant Surfaces vol.88, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.160245
  13. Implant Surface Factors and Bacterial Adhesion: A Review of the Literature vol.35, pp.10, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000154
  14. In Vitro Analysis of the Efficacy of Ultrasonic Scalers and a Toothbrush for Removing Bacteria from Resorbable Blast Material Titanium Disks vol.84, pp.8, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2012.120369
  15. Dicationic Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquid Coatings on Zirconia Surfaces: Physico-Chemical and Biological Characterization vol.8, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb8040050
  16. Bactericidal activity of the Ti–13Nb–13Zr alloy against different species of bacteria related with implant infection vol.12, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605X/aa770c
  17. Impact of surface topography and coating on osteogenesis and bacterial attachment on titanium implants vol.9, pp.2041-7314, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/2041731418790694
  18. Influence of Surface Properties on Adhesion Forces and Attachment of Streptococcus mutans to Zirconia In Vitro vol.2016, pp.None, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8901253
  19. Identification of Biofilm Inhibitors by Screening Combinatorial Libraries of Metal Oxide Thin Films vol.10, pp.15, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b02246
  20. Biological characterization of surface-treated dental implant materials in contact with mammalian host and bacterial cells: titanium versus zirconia vol.9, pp.55, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra06010c
  21. A study on the bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans in various dental ceramics: In vitro study vol.18, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2020-0070
  22. A study on the bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans in various dental ceramics: In vitro study vol.18, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2020-0070
  23. Zirconia versus titanium in dentistry: A review vol.39, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-172
  24. In vitro adherence of Candida albicans to zirconia surfaces vol.26, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.13319
  25. In vitro comparisons of microscale and nanoscale calcium silicate particles vol.8, pp.28, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb01202e
  26. Antibacterial and Antifungal Activities of PMMAs Implanted Fluorine and/or Silver Ions by Plasma-Based Ion Implantation with Argon vol.13, pp.20, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13204525
  27. Influence of Additive Firing on the Surface Characteristics, Streptococcus mutans Viability and Optical Properties of Zirconia vol.14, pp.5, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14051286
  28. Clinical Performance of Two Types of Primary Molar Indirect Crowns Fabricated by 3D Printer and CAD/CAM for Rehabilitation of Large Carious Primary Molars vol.15, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721905
  29. The effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and on host-derived immunological parameters vol.50, pp.10, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2021.01.021