한국수학교육학회지시리즈A:수학교육 (The Mathematical Education)

  • 제50권2호
  • /
  • Pages.185-212
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1225-1380(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9633(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

스프래드시트를 활용한 수엽이 통계적 사고 및 태도에 미치는 효과

Effects of Spreadsheet-used Instruction on Statistical Thinking and Attitude

  • 투고 : 2011.03.11
  • 심사 : 2011.05.17
  • 발행 : 2011.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this study is to analyze whether spreadsheet-used instruction can improve statistical thinking ability and attitude and also to identify what characteristics of statistical thinking is constructed. For this study, a subject of 2 classes were randomly selected among the 12 classes of the 11th grader in D high school and designated one class as the experimental group and the other class as the control group. Eight hours of the spread sheet-used instruction and the traditional textbook-oriented instruction had been carried out in each class. The research findings are as follows. First, the spread sheet-used instruction is shown to be more effective in enhancing statistical thinking than the traditional textbook-oriented instruction. Second, the spread sheet-used instruction is shown to be more effective in improving statistical attitude than the traditional textbook-oriented instruction. Third, students have shown the various characteristics of statistical thinking in the data descriptive process, data arrange-summary process, data representing process, and data analying process through the spread sheet-used instructions. Hence, the spread sheet-used instruction is recommended in teaching statistics.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김근진 (2006). Excel을 활용한 수업이 학업성취도 및 태도에 미치는 영향: 중학교 7-나 통계 단원을 중심으로, 강원대학교 석사학위논문.
  2. 김용균 (1999). Excel을 이용한 통계 학습자료 개발, 한국교원대학교 석사학위 논문.
  3. 교육인적자원부 (2007). 수학과 교육과정, 서울: 대한교과서주식회사.
  4. 류희찬 (2004). 수학교육에서 탐구형 소프트웨어의 활용방안, 한국교원대 수학 교육연구소 제 14회 수학교육세미나.
  5. 문소영 (2005). 7차 고등학교 수학과 교육과정에서 확률과 통계단원에 대한 인식 및 학습 실태분석, 한국교원대학교 석사학위 논문.
  6. 문청자 (2005). 중고등학생의 통계적 사고에 관한 연구, 건국대학교 석사학위논문.
  7. 변지영 (2005). 확률.통계 영역에 대한 교사들의 지식과 신념에 관한 연구, 한국교원대학교 석사학위 논문.
  8. 손홍찬 (2006). 스프레드시트를 활용한 수학적 모델링 활동에서의 수학적 발견과 정당화, 한국교원대학교 박사학위 논문.
  9. 신용대 (2003), ICT를 활용한 중학교 통계 수업이 학업성취도와 태도에 미치는 효과, 건국대학교 석사학위논문.
  10. 우정호 (2000). 통계교육의 개선방향 탐색. 대한수학교육학회 <학교수학>, 2(1). 1-27.
  11. 이현숙․전수현 (2009). 한국판 통계에 대한 태도검사 (K-SATS) 타당화, 응용통계연구, 22(5), 1115-1129.
  12. 조가을 (2008). 중학교 3학년 학생들의 통계적 사고 특성에 대한 분석, 한국교원대학교 석사학위 논문.
  13. Ben-Zvi, D., & Garfield, J. (2004). Research on Statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking : Issuess, challenges, and implication, In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Ed.), The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking, 397-409, Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  14. Chiesi, F., & Primi, C. (2009). Assessing statistics attitudes among college students : Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the survey of attitudes toward statistics, Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 309-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.008
  15. Cobb, G. W., & Moore, D. S. (1997). Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. The American Mathematical Monthly, 104(9). 801-823 https://doi.org/10.2307/2975286
  16. Garfield, J. (1998). The statistical reasoning assessment: Development and validation of a research tool, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Teaching Statistics, 781-786, On-line.
  17. DeMas, R., Garfield, J., & Chance, B. (1999). A model of classroom research in action: Developing simulation activities to improve students' statistical reasoning, Journal of Statistics Education, 7(3), On-line.
  18. Groth, R. E. (2003). Development of a high school statistical thinking framework, Unpublished doctoral dissertation: Illinois State University.
  19. Hogg, R. V. (1992). Toward Lean and Lively Courses in statistics, Florence Gordon & Sheldon Gordon(Ed.), Statistics for the Twenty First Century, Issues in Statistical Education, The Mathematical Association of America.
  20. Janice, S. C. (2003). Modeling aspects of students' attitudes and performance in an undergraduate introductory statistics course, Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia University.
  21. Kutzler, B. (2003). CAS as pedagogical tools for teaching and learning mathematics, In J. T. Fey, A. Cuoco, C. Kieran, L. McMullin, & R.M. Zbeik(Ed.), Computer Algebra Systems in Secondary School Mathematics Education, 53-71. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  22. Masalski, W. J. (1990). How to use the spreadsheet as a tool in the secondary school mathematics classroom, Reston, VA: NCTM.
  23. Maxara, C., & Biehler, R. (2006). Students' probabilistic simulation and modeling competence after a computer intensive elementary course in statistics and probability. In A. Rossman & B. Chance(Ed.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Teaching Statistics, 1-6, On-line.
  24. Mooney, E. S. (1999). Development of middle school statistical thinking framework. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Illinois state University.
  25. Mooney, E. S. (2002). A framework for characterizing middle school students' statistical thinking, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(4), 23-64.
  26. Moore, D. S. (1997). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review, 65(2), 123-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.1997.tb00390.x
  27. NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics, Reston, VA: NCTM.
  28. Pfannkuch, M., & Wild, C. J. (2004). Towards an understanding of statistical thinking. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield(Ed.), The Challenge of Developing Statistical Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking, 17-46. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  29. Russo L. M., & Passannante, M. R. (2001). Statistics fever, Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6(6), 370-376.
  30. Tempelaar, D. (2004). Statistical reasoning assessment: an analysis of the SRA instrument, Conference on assessment in statistics, Lawrence University.
  31. Wang, W., Wang, X., & Chen, G. (2009). Survey and analysis of the statistical reasoning among high school students in China and Dutch, Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(1), 15-26.