Journal of Korea Port Economic Association (한국항만경제학회지)

The Korea Port Economic Association (한국항만경제학회)
권호 표지

Operational Efficiency Analysis of ODCYs as Logistic Facilities in the Hinterland of Busan North Port : Based on DEA Modeling

DEA모형을 이용한 부산항 배후물류시설 ODCY의 운영효율성 분석

  • 서동균 (동아대학교 경영대학 국제무역학과)
  • Received : 2011.10.31
  • Accepted : 2011.12.29
  • Published : 2011.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to use DEA modeling to make an analysis on 12 ODCYs in the hinterland of Busan North Port, so that it may propose possible ways to efficiently operate them. For analysis, this study adopted 3 input factors such as CY area, number of employees and number of cargo work equipments and also adopted 1 output factor, i.e. container throughput. According to the analysis DEA-CCR model, it was found that Chunil(YongDang CY) was the most efficient one among companies engaged in the operation of ODCY. And it was found that KCTC(YongDang CY), Kukbo(U-Am CY), KORAIL(BusanJin CY) and Hanjin (JaeSong CY) would need to boost the container throughput 5 or more times higher than current throughput with a view to improving cargo handling efficiency, while Sebang(U-Am CY), KCTC(U-Am CY), KCTC(YongDang CY), Hyopsung(YongDang CY) and Kukbo(U-Am CY) need to work on personnel restructuring targeted to current employees. Based on the analysis DEA-BCC model, it was found that Chunil(YongDang CY), Dongbu(ShinYoung GamMan CY), Intergis(GamMan CY) and Sebang(U-Am CY) were efficient companies, but KCTC(YongDang CY), Kukbo(U-Am CY), KORAIL(BusanJin CY) and Hanjin(JaeSong CY) were inefficient companies. Particularly, it was found that both KCTC(U-Am CY) and Kukbo(U-Am CY) would need to try harder to carry out personnel reshuffle than other comparable companies.

본 연구의 목적은 부산항의 12개 ODCY를 대상으로 DEA분석을 실시하여 운영효율화 방안을 제시하는 것이다. 부산항 ODCY의 중요성에 비해 이에 대한 연구는 거의 전무하여 본 연구를 통해 ODCY의 필요성을 제시하고 운영효율화 방안도 제시하였다. 분석에 사용된 투입요소는 CY면적, 종사자수, 하역장비 대수를 선정하였고, 산출요소는 컨테이너처리량을 사용하였다. DEA-CCR모형의 분석결과는 천일정기(용당CY)가 효율적인 업체로 나타나 상대적으로 비효율적인 업체는 천일정기(용당CY)를 참조하여 효율성 개선 노력이 필요한 것으로 나타났다. 효율성 개선을 위해 KCTC(용당CY), 국보(우암CY), 코레일(부산진CY), 한진(재송CY)은 다른 업체에 비해 상대적으로 많은 컨테이너처리량 증가가 요구되고, 세방(우암CY), KCTC(우암CY), KCTC(용당CY), 협성(용당CY), 국보(우암CY)는 종사자에 대한 인적 구조조정이 필요한 것으로 나타났다. DEA-BCC모형의 분석결과 천일정기(용당CY), 동부(신영감만CY), 인터지스(감만CY), 세방(우암CY)가 효율적인 업체로 나타났고, 운영효율성 개선을 위해 KCTC(용당CY), 국보(우암CY), 코레일(부산진CY), 한진(재송CY)이 다른 업체에 비해 상대적으로 많은 컨테이너처리량 증가가 요구되고, KCTC(우암CY)와 국보(우암CY)는 상대적으로 인적 쇄신 노력이 필요한 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 관세청, 행정규칙입안예고 : 보세화물 입출항 하선 하기 및 적재에 관한 고시 개정, 2011.
  2. 류동근, "국내 컨테이너 전용터미널의 효율성 비교 : DEA 접근",해운물류연구, 제47호, 2005, 21-38.
  3. 모수원, "국내항만의 효율성 결정요소", 한국항만경제학회지, 제24집 제4호, 2008, 351-353.
  4. 모수원․이광배, "부산항과 광양항의 컨테이너터미널의 효율성",한국항만경제학회지, 제26집 제2호, 2010, 141-147.
  5. 박노경․박길영, "항만효율성 측정자료의 정규성과 변환불변성 검증 소고 : DEA접근",한국항만경제학회지, 제23집 제2호, 2007, 111-118.
  6. 전국화물자동차운송사업연합회, "컨테이너 육상운송 요율표", 2011.
  7. Banker, R. D., Charnesand, A. and Cooper, W. W., "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, Vol. 30, 1984, 1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  8. Barros, C. P., "Incentive Regulation and Efficiency of Portuguese Port Authorities," Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2003, 429-444.
  9. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E. L., "Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units," European J ournal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, 1978, 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  10. Park, R. K. and De, P., "An Alternative Approach to Efficiency Measurement of Seaports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2004, 53-69.
  11. Tongzon, J., "Efficiency Measurement of Selected Australian and other International Ports using Data Envelopment Analysis," Transportation Research, Part A 35, 2001, 107-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-2615(99)00039-9
  12. Valantine, V. C. and Gray, R., "Competition of Hub Ports: A Comparison between Europe and the Far East," Proceedings of the 2nd International Gwangyang Port Forum and International Conference for the 20th Anniversary of Korean Association of Shipping Studies, Korean Association of Shipping Studies, April, 2002, 161-176.