Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Corns with Different Nutritional Profiles on Growing and Finishing Pigs Feeding (30 to 90 kg)

  • Received : 2009.11.13
  • Accepted : 2011.02.26
  • Published : 2011.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Three experiments were carried out to determine the nutritional value and to verify the pig performance in growing and finishing phases (30 to 90 kg) fed on diets containing common corn (CC), high-lysine corn (HLC) and high-oil corn (HOC). In the total digestibility trial (Exp. I) 12 barrows were used. Values of digestible energy (DE) and metabolizable energy (ME) as-fed basis for CC, HLC and HOC, were: 3,396 and 3,275 kcal/kg; 3,248 and 3,139 kcal/kg; 3,445 and 3,308 kcal/kg, respectively. In order to determine the apparent and true ileal digestibility coefficients of amino acids, as well as the values of true digestible amino acids of the CC, HLC and HOC, an ileal digestibility trial was done (Exp. II) with T-cannulated barrows ("T" simple). The treatments consisted of three diets, with one of them as the sole source of protein (CC, HLC and HOC). In the performance experiment (Exp. III), 36 crossbred pigs, allotted in a completely randomized design with three treatments and 12 replications were used. Treatments consisted of three diets: 1 - CC; 2 - HLC and 3 - HOC. It was observed no difference for performance and carcass variables among the corns with different nutritional profiles. Results of the three experiments highlighted the importance of segregating corns in their real chemical and energetic composition as well as the values of true digestible amino acids for formulating diets for growing and finishing pigs.

Keywords

References

  1. ABCS. Metodo brasileiro de classificacao de carcacas. 1973. Publicacao Tecnica n 2. Estrela RS, 17p.
  2. Adeola, O. and N. L. Bajjalieh. 1997. Energy concentration of high oil corn varieties for pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 75:430-436.
  3. AFZ (Ajinomoto Eurolysine. AmiPig). 2000. Digestibilidade ileal estandarizada de aminoacidos em ingredientes para racoes de suinos. Aventis Animal Nutrition, INRA, ITCF.
  4. Apolonio, L. R., J. L. Donzele, R. F. M. Oliveira, A. V. C. Souza, F. C. O. Silva and S. Bunzen. 2003. Digestibilidade ileal de aminoacidos de alguns alimentos, determinada pela tecnica da canula T simples com suinos. R. Bras. Zootec. 32(3):605-614.
  5. Bellaver, C. 1989. Estimation of amino acid digestibility and its usefulness in swine feed formulation. Urbana Champaign: University of Illinois, 1989. 99p. Thesis (PhD - Animal Science) - University of Illinois.
  6. Burgoon, K. G., J. A. Hansen, D. A. Knabe and A. J. Bockholt. 1992. Nutritional value of quality protein maize for starter and finisher swine. J. Anim. Sci. 70:811-817.
  7. Camara, G., R. C. M. Souza, U. M. Freitas, J. Garrido and F. I. Mitsuo. 1996. SPRING: Integrating remote sensing and GIS by object-oriented data modelling. Comput. Graph. 20 (3):395-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0097-8493(96)00008-8
  8. EMBRAPA. Centro Nacional De Pesquisa De Suinos E Aves (CNPSA). 1991. Tabela de Composicao Quimica e Valores Energeticos de Alimentos para Suinos e Aves. 3th Ed. Concordia: 97p.
  9. Fan, M. Z. and W. C. Sauer. 1995. Determination of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in peas for pigs with the direct, difference and regression methods. Livest. Prod. Sci. 44:61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(95)00057-R
  10. Fontes, D. O., J. L. Donzele, A. G. Mascarenhas, L. R. Apolonio, F. C. O. Silva, F. A. P. V. Fontes and G. S. S. Correa. 2007. Composicao aminoacidica e digestibilidade ileal de aminoacidos de alimentos energeticos determinados com suinos submetidos a anastomose ileo-retal. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 59(1):196-202. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352007000100032
  11. Guidoni, A. L., D. L. Zanotto and C. Bellaver. 1997. Metodo alternativo na análise bioeconomica de experimentos com alimentacao de suinos. In: REUNIAO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 34, 1997, Juiz de Fora. Anais... Juiz de Fora: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, 1997. p. 106-108.
  12. Lima, G. J. M. M., C. L. Costa, V. S. Avila, C. H. Klein, C. Bellaver and P. A. R. Brum. 2003. Efeito do tipo de milho sobre o desempenho, qualidade de carcaca e valorizacao economica de suinos em crescimento e terminacao. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE VETERINARIOS ESPECIALISTAS EM SUINOS, 11, 2003. Goiania. Anais... Concordia: EMBRAPA Suinos e Aves, 2003. v.2, p.483.
  13. Matterson, L. D., L. M. Potter, M. W. Stutz and E. P. Singsen. 1965. The metabolizable energy of feed ingredients for chickens. Res. Rep. 7(1):11-14.
  14. Mosenthin, R., W. C. Sauer, R. Blank, J. Huisman and M. Z. Fan, 2000. The concept of digestible amino acids in diet formulation for pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 64:265-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00139-6
  15. National Pork Producers Council (NPPC). 1991. Procedures to evaluate market hogs. 3rd ed. Des Moines: NPPC, 16p.
  16. National Research Council (NRC). 1998. Nutrient requirements of swine. 10th Ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  17. Noblet, J. and J. van Milgen. 2004. Energy value of pig feeds: Effect of pig body weight and energy evaluation system. J. Anim. Sci. 82:229-238.
  18. O'Quinn, P. R., J. L. Nelssen, R. D. Goodband, D. A. Knabe, J. C. Woodworth, M. D. Tokach and T. T. Lohrmann. 2000. Nutritional value of a genetically improved high-lysine, high-oil corn for young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 78:2144-2149.
  19. Pedersen, C., M. G. Boersma and H. H. Stein. 2007. Energy and nutrient digestibility in NutriDense corn and other cereal grains fed to growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 85:2473-2483. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-620
  20. Pereira, J. R. A. and J. R. P. Rossi. 1995. Manual pratico da avaliacao nutricional dos alimentos. Piracicaba: Fundacao de Estudos Agrarios Luiz de Queiroz, 25p.
  21. Poore, J. R., T. P. Eck, R. S. Swingle and C. B. Theurer. 1989. Total starch and relative starch availability of grains. In: Bienal Conference on Rumen Function, 20., 1989, Chicago. Proceedings, Chicago. p.35.
  22. Pozza, P. C., R. V. Nunes, C. A. Oelke, I. Venturi, T. Pasquetti, A. C. Lohman and M. S. S. Pozza. 2005. Composicao quimica e valores energeticos de diferentes amostras de milho para suinos. In: XII CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE VETERINARIOS ESPECIALISTAS EM SUINOS, 12., 2005, Fortaleza. Anais... Fortaleza: Congresso da ABRAVES, 2005. p. 464-465.
  23. Rostagno, H. S., L. F. T. Albino, J. L. Donzele, P. C. Gomes, R. F. Oliveira, D. C. Lopes, A. S. Ferreira and S. L. T. Barr. 2005. Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suinos: composicao de alimentos e exigencias nutricionais. 2 ed. Vicosa, MG: Universidade Federal de Vicosa. p. 186.
  24. Sakomura, N. K. and H. S. Rostagno. 2007. Metodos de pesquisa em nutricao de monogastricos. Jaboticabal: Funep, p. 283.
  25. Saldivar, S. O. S. and L. W. Rooney. 1994. Quality protein maize processing and perspectivers for industrial utilization. In: Quality Protein Maize (Ed. B. A. Larkins and E. T. Mertz). USA: Purdue University Press, p. 1964 -1994.
  26. Sauer, W. C. and L. Ozimek. 1986. Digestibility of amino acids in swine: Results and their practical applications. A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 15:367-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(86)90076-X
  27. Silva, D. J. and A. C. Queiroz. 2002. Analise de alimentos (metodos quimicos e biologicos). 3th Ed. Vicosa, MG: Universidade Federal de Vicosa, p. 235.
  28. Silva, M. A. A., A. C. Furlan, I. Moreira, D. Paiano, C. C. Jobim and L. C. G. Barcellos. 2006. Avaliacao nutricional do milho com maior teor de oleo, nas formas de graos secos e silagens, para suinos nas fases de crescimento e terminacao. R. Bras. Zootec. 35(3):830-839. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982006000300028
  29. Snow, J. P., P. K. Ku, H. H. Stein, M. Allen and N. L. Trottier. 1998. Apparent ileal amino acid digestibilities of different corn hybrids fed to growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 76(Suppl. 2):132 (Abstr.).
  30. Spurlock, M. E., G. R. Frank, G. M. Willis, J. L. Kuske and S. G. Cornelius. 1997. Effect of dietary energy source and immunological challenge on growth performance and immunological variables in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 75:720-726.
  31. Tanksley Jr., T. D. and D. A. Knabe. 1993. Ileal digestibility of amino acids in pigs feeds and their use in formulating diets. In: Recent Development in Pig Nutrition 2. (Ed. D. J. A. Cole, W. Haresing and P. C. Garnsworthy). Nottinghan University, p. 375.
  32. UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE VICOSA (UFV). 2000. SAEG, System for statistical and genetic analyses (version 8.0), Universidade Federal de Vicosa-Vicosa, MG, Brazil.
  33. Vieira, R. O., P. B. Rodrigues, R. T. F. Freitas, G. A. J. Nascimento, E. L. Silva and R. Hespanho. 2007. Composicao quimica e energia metabolizavel de híbridos de milho para frangos de corte. R. Bras. Zootec. 36(4):832-838. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982007000400012

Cited by

  1. A Challenging Study to Identify Target Proteins by a Proteomics Approach and Their Validation by Raising Polyclonal Antibody vol.31, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2011.31.4.506
  2. Corn types with different nutritional profiles, extruded or not, on piglets (6 to 15 kg) feeding vol.40, pp.11, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011001100026
  3. Digestible and metabolizable energy in corn grains from different origins for growing pigs vol.86, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12315
  4. Linear associations among phenological, morphological, productive, and energetic-nutritional traits in corn vol.52, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2017000100004