DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Surface Covering Methods for Reducing Soil Loss of Highland Slope in Radish Cultivation

고랭지 경사 밭 무 재배지에서 토양유실경감을 위한 피복방법 평가

  • Lee, Jeong-Tae (Highland Agriculture Research Center, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Gye-Jun (Highland Agriculture Research Center, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Ryu, Jong-Soo (Highland Agriculture Research Center, National Institute of Crop Science, RDA) ;
  • Park, Suk-Hoo (National Academy of Agriculture Science, RDA) ;
  • Han, Kyung-Hwa (National Academy of Agriculture Science, RDA) ;
  • Zhang, Yong-Seon (National Academy of Agriculture Science, RDA)
  • 이정태 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 고령지농업연구센터) ;
  • 이계준 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 고령지농업연구센터) ;
  • 류종수 (농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 고령지농업연구센터) ;
  • 박석호 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 한경화 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 장용선 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원)
  • Received : 2011.08.28
  • Accepted : 2011.10.11
  • Published : 2011.10.31

Abstract

There is relatively high vulnerability of soil erosion in slope highland agriculture due to a reclamation of mountain as well as low surface covering in early summer season with high rainfall intensity time. The aim of this study was to evaluate various surface covering methods for reducing soil loss in highland radish cultivation in highland. The experiment was conducted in 17% sloped lysimeter ($2.5m{\times}13.4m$) with 8 treatments including covering with cut rye, sod culture of rye, Ligularia fischeri var. spiciformis Nakai, Arachniodes aristata Tindale, Aster koraiensis Nakai, Festuca myuros L. and mulching with black polyethylene film, and runoff water, eroded soil and radish growth were investigated. Surface covering with sod culture and plant residue, especially cut rye treatment, had lower runoff water than non-covering, whereas black polyethylene film mulching had the reverse. The amount of eroded soil was also lowest in cut rye treatment, $0.3Mg\;ha^{-1}$, and increased in the order of rye sod culture, Ligularia fischeri var. spiciformis Nakai, Aster koraiensis Nakai, Festuca myuros L., Arachniodes aristata Tindale, black polyethylene film, and non-covering, $68.2Mg\;ha^{-1}$. The results showed that surface covering with sod culture or plant residue could be effective for reducing runoff water and soil erosion in the radish field, significantly in cut rye treatment. On the other hand, in sod culture of rye, Aster koraiensis Nakai and Ligularia fischeri var. spiciformis Nakai, radish yields were lower than in the non-covering. Unlike this, covering with cut rye, sod culture of Festuca myuros L. had similar radish yield to the non-covering radish yield. In conclusion, covering with cut rye and sod culture of Festuca myuros L. were beneficial for reduction of soil loss without decreasing in radish yield in highland sloped fields.

우리나라 밭은 대부분 산지를 개간하여 조성한 경사 밭으로 작물이 재배되는 여름철 집중강우에 의해 많은 양의 토양이 유실된다. 특히 경사 밭 전면경운에 의한 토양 교란은 무의 발아, 생육초기 단계로 쏟아지는 강우에 표토가 직접 노출되어 토양유실 위험이 가중되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 고랭지 무 재배의 경우 토양피복방법 개선에 의한 토양유실 저감기술을 개발하고자 수행하였다. 토양피복 방법으로 호밀 예취피복, 호밀 초생피복, 흑색비닐멀칭 등 8 처리를 두었으며, 경사 17%내외 무저라이시메타에서 유거수 및 토양유출 특성과 무 생육특성을 평가하였다. 시험결과 호밀예취피복을 포함한 토양피복처리는 유거수 유출량에 있어 ha당 관행 $2,994m^3$인 반면, $773{\sim}2,325m^3$이 유거되어 관행보다 26~78% 수준으로 유거수 량이 감소하였다. 이와 같은 결과는 토양유실량에도 영향을 미쳐 관행 처리구가 ha당 68.2톤인 반면, 호밀예취피복을 포함한 피복처리구는 0.3~16.1톤으로 관행 대비 76~99%에 해당하는 토양유실 경감 효과가 있는 것으로 평가되었다. 무 수확기 수량 구성요소인 근중은 관행의 경우 ha당 92.5톤 수준을 보였는데, 호밀 초생피복은 40.1톤, 벌개미취 초생피복은 46.1톤, 곰취 초생피복은 78.5톤 수준으로 낮은 경향을 보였다. 반면, 호밀 예취피복은 92.9톤, 들묵새 초생피복은 102.6톤, 흑색비닐멀칭은 109.8톤으로 관행과 비슷하거나 오히려 증수되는 결과를 보였다. 본 연구 결과 호밀 예취피복 및 들묵새 초생피복은 무 수량에 는 영향을 미치지 않으면서 토양유실 경감효과가 매우 높아 경사 밭 토양보전기술로 유용하게 적용 되리라 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baver, L.D., W.H. Gardner, and W.R. Gardner. 1972. Soil Physics. Hohn Willey and Sons Inc.
  2. Cruse, R.M. 2002. Strip tillage effects on crop production and soil erosion. Iowa State University.
  3. Duran, Z.V.H. and P.C.R. Rodriguez. 2008. Soil-erosion and runoff prevention by plant covers, Review. Agron. Sustainable Dev. 28:143-149.
  4. Duran, Z.V.H., P.C.R. Rodriguez, P.F.J. Martin, J. de Graaff. M.J.R. Francia, and D.C. Flanagen. 2011. Environmental impact of introducing plant covers in the taluses of terraces: Implications for mitigating agricultural soil erosion and runoff. Catena 84:79-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2010.10.004
  5. FAO. 2000. Manual on integrated soil management and conservation practices. FAO Land and Water Bulletin 8 ISSN 1024-6073.
  6. Foster, G.R., D.K. McCool, K.G. Renard, and W.C. Moldenhauser. 1981. Conversion of the universal soil loss equation to SI units. J. Soil Water Conserv. 36(6):355-359.
  7. Kim, J.T. and S.W. Park. 1994. Runoff and soil losses from sloping lands with different cropping practices. J. Korean Soc. Agric. Eng. 36(1):73-82.
  8. Laflen, J.M. and W.C. Moldenhauer. 1979. Soil and water loss from corn-soybean rotations. Soil Sci. Am. J. 43:1213-1215. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1979.03615995004300060032x
  9. Lee, J.T. G.J. Lee, C.S. Park, S.W. Hwang, and Y.R. Yeoung. 2005. Effect of hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) sod culture on decreasing soil loss and providing nitrogen for chinese cabbage in highland. Korean J. Soil Sci. Fert. 38(5):294-300.
  10. Luna, J. and M. Stabel. 2003. Using strip tillage in vegetable production systems in western oregon. Oregon State University Extension Service.
  11. Park, S.H., D.H. Lee, H.J. Kim, C.S. Lee, S.C. Cho, and T.Y. Kwak. 2002. Development of dry paddy seeder of strip tillage. J. Biosyst. Eng. 27(1):25-32 (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2002.27.1.025
  12. Peterson, d. 2004. Strip-Till: The Best of Both Worlds. University of Illinois Extension, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences.
  13. Wainwright, J., A.J. Parsons, and A.D. Abronbams. 2000. Plot scale studies of vegetation, overland flow and erosion interactions: Case studies from Arizona and New Mexico. Hydrol. Process 14:2921-2943. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1085(200011/12)14:16/17<2921::AID-HYP127>3.0.CO;2-7
  14. Wischmeier, W.H. and D.D. Smith. 1978. Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning. p. 58. Agricultural Handbook No. 537, USDA, Washington D.C., USA.
  15. 농업공학연구소. 1999. 농업공학연구소 연구보고서.
  16. 농업과학기술원. 2000. 토양 및 식물체 분석방법.
  17. 농업과학기술원. 2006. 작물별시비처방기준.
  18. 농촌진흥청. 2003. 농업과학기술 연구조사분석기준.

Cited by

  1. Estimation Suspended Solids Concentration of the Doam Reservoir under Dry and Wet Weather Conditions vol.31, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2012.31.2.113
  2. Synergies and tradeoffs between nitrate leaching and net farm income: The case of nitrogen best management practices in South Korea vol.186, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2014.02.003