DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Stereotype and Effective Cues for Burner-Control Relationship of Four-Stove Range

4구 가스레인지 버너-조종장치 연결에 대한 스테레오타이프 및 효과적 암시 신호

  • Kee, Do-Hyung (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Keimyung University)
  • 기도형 (계명대학교 경영공학과)
  • Received : 2011.05.03
  • Accepted : 2011.05.19
  • Published : 2011.06.01

Abstract

This study aims to investigate stereotype and effective cue presentation methods for burner-control relationship of four-stove range for Korean. A total of 381 subjects(male : 262, female : 119) were surveyed using questionnaire, in which eight gas range models drawn by 3-D Max 2010 were presented. The gas range models were labeled by signs(☆#${\triangle}{\square}$) to eliminate suggestive effect of sequential codes such as alphabets and numbers. The results showed that the stereotype was significantly affected by occupation(p < 0.10), but not by subjects' gender and age(p > 0.39). The stereotype of four-burner gas range for Korean was the same as that of Chinese, while the stereotype was different from that of American. The cues with rectangular-shaped arrangements identical or similar to those of burners were effective to relate burners to corresponding controls. The diamond-shaped cues and burner arrangements were not appropriate for representing burner-control relationship of four-stove gas range. These findings would be used as a basic guideline when designing four-burner gas range or similar equipments.

Keywords

References

  1. Bridger, R. S. (1995), Introduction to ergonomics, Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
  2. Chan, W. H. and Chan, H. S. (2003), Movement compatibility for rotary control and circular display-computer simulated test and real hardware test, Applied Ergonomics, 34, 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00075-3
  3. Courtney, A. J. (1994), The effect of scale-side, indicator type, and control plane on direction-of-turn stereotypes for Hong Kong Chinese subjects, Ergonomics, 37(5), 865-877. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408963696
  4. Fitts, P. M. (1951), Engineering psychology and equipment design, in S. S. Stevens(ed), Handbook of experimental psychology, Wiley, New York, 1287-1340.
  5. Hoffmann, E. R. (2009), Do paper-and-pencil tests give an accurate measure of stereotype strength?-A review of available data, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39, 904-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.06.001
  6. Hsu, S-H. and Peng, Y. (1993), Control/display relationship of the fourburner stove : A reexamination, Human Factors, 35(4), 745-749. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089303500413
  7. Kroemer, K. H. E., Kroemer, H. B. and Kroemer-Elbert, K. E. (1994), Ergonomics : How to design for ease and efficiency, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
  8. Lee, K-P. (200), The cross-cultural comparison of population stereotypes between Korea and Japan, and its cultural implications, International Ergonomics Symposium, 359-363.
  9. Petropoulos, H. and Brebner, J. (1981), Stereotypes for direction-ofmovement of rotary controls associated with linear displays, Ergonomics, 24(2), 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138108924839
  10. Ray, R. D. and Ray, W. D. (1979), An analysis of domestic cooker control design, Ergonomics, 22, 1243-1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137908924698
  11. Sanders, M. S. and McCormick, E. J. (1987), Human factors in engineering and design, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
  12. Shinar, D. and Acton, M. B. (1978), Control-display relationships on the four-burner range : Population streotypes versus standard, Human Factors, 20, 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872087802000102
  13. Small, A. M. (1951), Compatibility as a principle in multi-sensory display, Ergonomics Research Society Meeting.
  14. Verhagen, P., Bervoets, R., Debranere, G., Millet, F. (1975), Santermans, G., Stucky, M., Vandermoere, D. and Willems, G., Direction of movement stereotypes in different cultural groups, In Ethnic variables in human factors engineering, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
  15. Wu, S-P. (1997), Further studies on the spatial compatibility of four control-display linkages, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19, 353-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00014-5

Cited by

  1. Empirical Study on Stereotype for Burner-Control Relationship of Four-Stove Gas Range for Koreans vol.31, pp.3, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2012.31.3.463
  2. Accuracy of Paper-pencil Test used in Investigation of Control-display Stereotype - Focused on Stereotype for Control-burner Relationship of Four-stove Range - vol.28, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2013.28.3.114