Reproductive and Developmental Biology

  • 제35권1호
  • /
  • Pages.105-113
  • /
  • 2011
  • /
  • 1738-2432(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-0151(eISSN)
한국동물번식학회 (The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction)
권호 표지

Nuclear Modeling and Developmental Potential of Bovine Somatic Nuclear Transfer Embryos Cloned by Two Different Activation Methods

  • Jeon, Byeong-Gyun (OBS/Theriogenology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Rho, Gyu-Jin (OBS/Theriogenology and Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 투고 : 2011.03.02
  • 심사 : 2011.03.07
  • 발행 : 2011.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The present study investigated the nuclear remodeling, development potential with telomerase activity and transcription level of X-linked genes (ANT3, HPRT, MeCP2, RPS4X, XIAP, XIST and ZFX) in the bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos using two different fusion and activation methods. Female adult fibroblasts were injected into perivitelline space of in vitro matured oocytes. The oocyte-nucleus complexes were fused and followed by immediately either activated (Group 1), or activated at 1 h post-fusion (hpf) (Group 2), respectively. The incidence of normal premature chromosome condensation (PCC) at 1 hpf was slightly increased in the Group 2, compared to those of Group 1, but there was no significant (p<0.05) difference. The incidence of normal pronucleus (PN) and chromosome spread at 5 and 18 hpf were significantly (p<0.05) higher in the Group 2 than those of Group 1. The cleavage rate to 2-cell stage, developmental rate to blastocyst stage, and the mean number of total and ICM cell numbers were significantly (p<0.05) higher in the Group 2, compared to those of Group 1. Level of telomerase activity was significantly (p<0.05) higher in the SCNT blastocysts of Group 2, compared to those of Group 1. Transcript levels of HPRT, MeCP2 and XIST were not significantly (p<0.05) different between blastocysts of Group 1 and 2. However, transcript level of ANT3, RPS4X, XIAP and ZFX were significantly (p<0.05) up-regulated in the SCNT blastocysts of Group 2, compared to those of Group 1. Taken together, it is concluded that oocyte activation at 1 hpf induces the enhanced developmental potential by efficient nuclear remodeling and subsequent facilitation of the nuclear reprogramming of bovine SCNT embryos.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Akagi S, Adachi N, Matsukawa K, Kubo M, Taka-hashi S (2003): Developmental potential of bovine nuclear transfer embryos and postnatal survival rate of cloned calves produced by two different timings of fusion and activation. Mol Reprod Dev 66:264-272. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.10352
  2. Aston KI, Li GP, Hicks BA, Sessions BR, Pate BJ, Hammon D, Bunch TD, White KL (2006): Effect of the time interval between fusion and activation on nuclear state and development in vitro and in vivo of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Reproduction 131:45-51. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00714
  3. Betts D, Bordignon V, Hill J, Winger Q, Westhusin M, Smith L, King W (2001): Reprogramming of telomerase activity and rebuilding of telomere length in cloned cattle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1077-1082. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.3.1077
  4. Boggs BA, Chinault AC (1994): Analysis of replication timing properties of human X-chromosomal loci by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:6083-6087. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.91.13.6083
  5. Brown CJ, Chow JC (2003): Beyond sense: the role of antisense RNA in controlling Xist expression. Semin Cell Dev BioI 14:341-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2003.09.013
  6. Chang SC, Tucker T, Thorogood NP, Brown CJ (2006): Mechanisms of X-chromosome inactivation. Front Biosci 11:852-866. https://doi.org/10.2741/1842
  7. Collas P, Robl JM (1991): Relationship between nuclear remodeling and development in nuclear transplant rabbit embryos. BioI Reprod 45:455-465. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod45.3.455
  8. De Sousa PA, Dobrinsky JR, Zhu J, Archibald AL, Ainslie A, Bosma W, Bowering J, Bracken J, Ferrier PM, Flctcher J, Gasparrini B, Harkncss L, Johnston P, Ritchie M, Ritchie WA, Travers A, Albertini D, Dinnyes A, King TJ, Wilmut I (2002): Somatic cell nuclear transfer in the pig: control of pronuclear formation and integration with improved methods for activation and maintenance of pregnancy. BioI Reprod 66:642-650. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod66.3.642
  9. Guilleret I, Benhattar J (2003): Demethylation of the human telomerase catalytic subunit (hTERT) gene promoter reduced hTERT expression and telomerase activity and shortened telomeres. Exp Cell Res 289:326-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-4827(03)00281-7
  10. Harada H, Grant S (2003): Apoptosis regulators. Rev Clin Exp Hematol 7:117-138.
  11. Heard E (2004): Recent advances in X-chromosome inactivation. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 16:247-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2004.03.005
  12. Hoare SF, Bryce LA, Wisman GB, Burns S, Going JJ, van der Zee AG, Keith WN (2001): Lack of telomerase RNA gene hTERC expression in alternative lengthening of telomeres cells is associated with methylation of the hTERC promoter. Cancer Res 61:27-32.
  13. Jeon BG, Coppola G, Perrault SD, Rho GJ, Betts DH, King WA (2008): S-adenosylhomocysteine treatment of adult female fibroblasts alters X-chromosome inactivation and improves in vitro embryo development after somatic cell nuclear transfer. Reproduction 135:815-828. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-07-0442
  14. Kawahara M, Wakai T, Yamanaka K, Kobayashi J, Sugimura S, Shimizu T, Matsumoto H, Kim JH, Sasada H, Sato E (2005): Caffeine promotes premature chromosome condensation formation and in vitro development in porcine reconstructed embryos via a high level of maturation promoting factor activity during nuclear transfer. Reproduction 130:351-357. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00644
  15. Keefer CL (2008): Lessons learned from nuclear transfer (cloning). Theriogenology 69:48-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.08.033
  16. Kikuchi K, Naito K, Daen FP, Izaike Y, Toyoda Y (1995): Histone H1 kinase activity during in vitro fertilization of pig follicular oocytes matured in vitro. Theriogenology 43:523-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)00044-U
  17. Kurome M, Fujimura T, Murakami H, Takahagi Y, Wako N, Ochiai T, Miyazaki K, Nagashima H (2003): Comparison of electro-fusion and intracytoplasmic nuclear injection methods in pig cloning. Cloning Stem Cells 5:367-378. https://doi.org/10.1089/153623003772032862
  18. Liu JH, Yin S, Xiong B, Hou Y, Chen DY, Sun QY (2008): Aberrant DNA methylation imprints in aborted bovine clones. Mol Reprod Dev 75:598-607. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20803
  19. Mitalipov SM, Zhou Q, Byrne JA, Ji WZ, Norgren RB, Wolf DP (2007): Reprogramming following somatic cell nuclear transfer in primates is dependent upon nuclear remodeling. Hum Reprod 22:2232-2242. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem136
  20. Niemann H, Tian XC, King WA, Lee RS (2008): Epigenetic reprogramming in embryonic and foetal development upon somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning. Reproduction 135:151-163. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-07-0397
  21. Nolen LD, Gao S, Han Z, Mann MR, Gie Chung Y, Otte AP, Bartolomei MS, Latham KE (2005): X chromosome reactivation and regulation in cloned embryos. Dev BioI 279:525-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.01.016
  22. Park KW, Lai L, Cheong HT, Im GS, Sun QY, Wu G, Day BN, Prather RS (2001): Developmental potential of porcine nuclear transfer embryos derived from transgenic fetal fibroblasts infected with the gene for the green fluorescent protein: comparison of different fusion/activation conditions. BioI Reprod 65:1681-1685. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod65.6.1681
  23. Prather RS, Sims MM, First NL (1990): Nuclear transplantation in the pig embryo: nuclear swelling. J Exp Zool 255:355-358. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.1402550312
  24. Prather RS, Sutovsky P, Green JA (2004): Nuclear remodeling and reprogramming in transgenic pig production. Exp BioI Med 229:1120-1126.
  25. Shin MR, Park SW, Shim H, Kim NH (2002): Nuclear and microtubule reorganization in nuclear- transferred bovine embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 62:74-82. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.10069
  26. Thouas GA, Korfiatis NA, French AJ, Jones GM, Trounson AO (2001): Simplified technique for differential staining of inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells of mouse and bovine blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online 3:25-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61960-8
  27. Tian XC, Lonergan P, Jeong BS, Evans AC, Yang X (2002): Association of MPF, MAPK and nuclear progression dynamics during activation of young and aged bovine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 62:132-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.10072
  28. Wakayama T, Perry AC, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR, Yanagimachi R (1998): Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature 394:369-374. https://doi.org/10.1038/28615
  29. Whitaker M, Patel R (1990): Calcium and cell cycle control. Development 108:525-542.
  30. Whitworth KM, Prather RS (2010): Somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency: how can it be improved through nuclear remodeling and reprogramming? Mol Reprod Dev 77:1001-1015. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.21242
  31. Xue F, Tian XC, Du F, Kubota C, Taneja M, Dinnyes A, Dai Y, Levine H, Pereira LV, Yang X (2002): Aberrant patterns of X chromosome inactivation in bovine clones. Nature Genetics 31 216-220. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng900
  32. Yang C, Przyborski S, Cooke MJ, Zhang X, Stewart R, Anyfantis G, Atkinson SP, Saretzki G, Armstrong L, Lako M (2008): A key role for telomerase reverse transcriptase unit in modulating hmnan embryonic stem cell proliferation, cell cycle dynamics, and in vitro differentiation. Stem Cells 26:850-863. https://doi.org/10.1634/stemcells.2007-0677
  33. You J, Song K, Lee E (2010): Prolonged interval between fusion and activation impairs embryonic development by inducing chromosome scattering and nuclear aneuploidy in pig somatic cell nuclear transfer. Reprod Fertil Dev 22:977-986. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD09309
  34. Zamora M, Granell M, Mampel T, Vinas O (2004): Adenine nucleotide translocase 3 (ANT3) overexpression induces apoptosis in cultured cells. FEBS Lett 563:155-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(04)00293-5