DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of specimen preparation method on the microtensile bond strength of veneering ceramic to zirconia

시편 제작 방법이 지르코니아 코어와 비니어링 세라믹의 미세 인장결합강도에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Ki-Yeon (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yeo, In-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han, Jung-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jai-Bong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yang, Jae-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 김기연 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 여인성 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 김성훈 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 한중석 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이재봉 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 양재호 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2010.10.05
  • Accepted : 2011.03.11
  • Published : 2011.04.29

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate effect of specimen preparation method on the microtensile bond strength of veneering ceramic to zirconia core. Materials and methods: Cylindrical Lava zirconia block (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) was cut into discs using a diamond disc. After sintering, the core specimens were placed in an adjustable mold and veneered with Lava ceram (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany). The disc shaped specimen of group 1 was cut into microbars ($1{\times}1{\times}7\;mm^3$) using a low speed diamond disc under water cooling (n = 15). The specimen of group 2 was cut into microbars ($1.2{\times}1.2{\times}7\;mm^3$) in the same way. Whereafter the microbars were trimmed ($1{\times}1{\times}7\;mm^3$) using a thick diamond disc under water cooling (n = 15). The microtensile bond strength was tested in a microtensile tester (Instron 8848, $Instron^{(R)}$ Co., Norwood, USA). Fractured microtensile specimens were analyzed under a stereomicroscope (MZ6, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) at magnification ${\times}30$. Results: The microtensile bond strength of group 1 ($28.8{\pm}7.0\;MPa$) was significantly higher than group 2 ($11.0{\pm}33\;MPa$) (P=.00). Conclusion: It appears advisable to avoid the trimming action, especially high strength ceramic specimens.

연구 목적: 미세 인장결합강도 측정을 위한 시편 제작 시 발생하는 스트레스가 결합강도에 어떠한 영향을 미치는 지를 알아보고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 원통 모양의 지르코니아 블럭을 다이아몬드 디스크를 이용해 디스크 형태로 자른 후 소결하였다. 소결된 지르코니아 디스크에 소성시 수축을 고려한 적당한 크기의 틀을 제작하여 LAVA ceram (3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany) 도재를 축성한 후 소성하였다. 먼저 그룹 1은 디스크 모양의 시편을 충분히 물을 뿌려가며 다이아몬드 디스크를 이용하여 $1{\times}1{\times}7\;mm^3$의 막대기 모양으로 저속에서 절단하였다 (n = 15). 그룹 2는 같은 방법으로 $1.2{\times}1.2{\times}7\;mm^3$로 자른 후 두꺼운 다이아몬드 디스크를 이용해 $1{\times}1{\times}7\;mm^3$로 트리밍하였다 (n = 15). 그 후 특별히 제작된 지그에 각각의 시편을 core-veneer의 접착면이 오염되지 않도록 조심히 접착한 후 미세 인장결합강도 측정기 (Instron 8848, $Instron^{(R)}$ Co., Norwood, USA)를 이용하여 미세 인장결합강도를 측정하였다. 측정이 끝난 시편은 파절면을 stereomicroscope (MZ6, Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) 로 30배 확대 관찰하여 파절의 종류를 구분하였다. 결과: 지르코니아 코어와 비니어링 세라믹 간의 평균 미세 인장결합강도는 절단만 시행한 그룹은 $28.8{\pm}7.0\;MPa$, 절단 후 트리밍을 한 그룹은 $11.0{\pm}33\;MPa$로 절단후 트리밍을 한 시편이 유의성 있게 결합강도가 낮아진 것으로 나타났다 (P=.00). 결론: 미세 인장결합강도 측정을 위한 시편 제작 시 가능한 한 스트레스를 가하지 않고 미세 시편을 제작하는 것이 중요하다고 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Manicone PF, Rossi Iommetti P, Raffaelli L. An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. J Dent 2007;35:819-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008
  2. Vult von Steyern P, Carlson P, Nilner K. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures designed according to the DC-Zirkon technique. A 2-year clinical study. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:180-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01437.x
  3. Raigrodski AJ, Chiche GJ, Potiket N, Hochstedler JL, Mohamed SE, Billiot S, Mercante DE. The efficacy of posterior three-unit zirconium-oxide-based ceramic fixed partial dental prostheses: a prospective clinical pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:237-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.010
  4. Sailer I, Feher A, Filser F, Luthy H, Gauckler LJ, Scharer P, Franz Hammerle CH. Prospective clinical study of zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: 3-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 2006;37:685-93.
  5. Aboushelib MN, de Jager N, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:984-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.03.013
  6. Al-Dohan HM, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Shear strength of core-veneer interface in bi-layered ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:349-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.009
  7. Kelly JR, Tesk JA, Sorensen JA. Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo: analysis and modeling. J Dent Res 1995;74:1253-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740060301
  8. Isgro G, Pallav P, van der Zel JM, Feilzer AJ. The influence of the veneering porcelain and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of a heat-pressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:465-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.003
  9. al-Shehri SA, Mohammed H, Wilson CA. Influence of lamination on the flexural strength of a dental castable glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:23-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90341-8
  10. Della Bona A, van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 1995;74:1591-6. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740091401
  11. Sano H, Ciucchi B, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res 1994;73:1205-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730061201
  12. Van Noort R, Cardew GE, Howard IC, Noroozi S. The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin. J Dent Res 1991;70:889-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700050501
  13. Cardoso PE, Braga RR, Carrilho MR. Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater 1998;14:394-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00012-3
  14. Valandro LF, Ozcan M, Amaral R, Vanderlei A, Bottino MA. Effect of testing methods on the bond strength of resin to zirconia-alumina ceramic: microtensile versus shear test. Dent Mater J 2008;27:849-55. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.27.849
  15. Reis A, de Oliveira Bauer JR, Loguercio AD. Influence of crosshead speed on resin-dentin microtensile bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:275-8.
  16. Yamaguchi K, Miyazaki M, Takamizawa T, Tsubota K, Rikuta A. Influence of crosshead speed on micro-tensile bond strength of twostep adhesive systems. Dent Mater 2006;22:420-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.031
  17. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 1994;10:236-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  18. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Effect of cross-sectional surface area on bond strengths between resin and dentin. Dent Mater 1998;14:120-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00018-9
  19. El Zohairy AA, de Gee AJ, de Jager N, van Ruijven LJ, Feilzer AJ. The influence of specimen attachment and dimension on microtensile strength. J Dent Res 2004;83:420-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300513
  20. Goracci C, Sadek FT, Monticelli F, Cardoso PE, Ferrari M. Influence of substrate, shape, and thickness on microtensile specimens' structural integrity and their measured bond strengths. Dent Mater 2004;20:643-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.08.009
  21. Poitevin A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Influence of three specimen fixation modes on the micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater J 2007;26:694-9. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.694
  22. Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jevnikar P, Funduk N, Marion L. The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 1999;15:426-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00070-6